SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The (Mostly) Unspoken Afghanistan Rationale

THE PLANK AUGUST 27, 2009

The (Mostly) Unspoken Afghanistan Rationale

At a Brookings forum earlier this week former CIA man Bruce Riedel, who led the Obama White House's Afghanistan review earlier this year, put this spin on the stakes there:

The triumph of jihadism or the jihadism of Al Qaeda and the Taliban in driving NATO out of Afghanistan would resonate throughout the Islamic World.This would be a victory on par with the destruction of the Soviet Union in the 1990s. And, those moderates in the Islamic World who would say, no, we have to be moderate, we have to engage, would find themselves facing a real example. No, we just need to kill them, and we will drive them out. So I think the stakes are enormous.

This is not a rationale you often hear from the administration and its defenders, perhaps because it sounds eerily like one of the core Bush administration justifications for slogging it out in Iraq. But given the murkiness of other arguments for a prolonged engagement, I suspect this one carries more weight at the White House than people realize. 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

0 comments

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close