SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Who's Ignoring What Now?

THE PLANK AUGUST 31, 2007

Who's Ignoring What Now?

Over at Andrew Sullivan's place, Jamie Kirchick laments the decline of the "anti-totalitarian left" and claims that the U.S. labor movement has abandoned its counterparts in Iraq:

Whereas once the AFL-CIO had a large and effective international office, you'd be hard-pressed to hear, for instance, what they're doing for Iraqi trade-unionists.

But hang on, you'd only be "hard-pressed" if you didn't have access to Google. Just this past March, John Sweeney brokered a meeting between "17 top leaders from five Iraqi trade union federations" and the financial institutions working in Iraq. The AFL-CIO has been one of the few places tracking worker abuses in the country. Its Solidarity Center has been holding training workshops for Iraqi workers, pushing women's rights, and "connect[ing] Iraqi trade unions with their counterparts throughout the region." And so on. Now, the AFL-CIO has always been a fairly conservative group, and I don't agree with everything they did during the cold war (e.g.), but it's wrong to suggest that they've been ignoring Iraq.

On the other hand, as Matthew Harwood reported in 2005, those "idealists" in the Bush administration's CPA were so intent on privatization during their first few years in Iraq that they really did push aside--and were often hostile toward--Iraqi labor groups, which were one of the few dedicated anti-insurgent, anti-Baathist organizations in the country.

--Bradford Plumer

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 12 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

12 comments

Silly Brad, you should know that Jaime isn't going to let some trifling detail like "facts" get in the way of a perfectly good attack on his liberal hobglobbin of the day.

- mundye

August 31, 2007 at 1:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The sad thing is, he seems to be bright and talented. I think he's a little young to be taking on the role of crotchety demagogue, but that seems to be exactly what he's doing. I blame Marty Peretz. I really see two Jaimie Kirchicks - one who has something to say and a decent amount of facility with the tools for saying it, and one who has an ossified ideological viewpoint in search of confirmation. The quality of his writing seems to vary inversely with how much he is serving his ideological side.

- jblumenfeld

August 31, 2007 at 1:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Can he stay over at Sullivan's blog? Please?

- adamvaught

August 31, 2007 at 1:20pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

No Way!!! At the very least he needs to be someplace with a comments section. The only thing that makes him bearable when gets going is getting to read the flaming Talkback.

- jblumenfeld

August 31, 2007 at 1:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Let mini stay over with Sullivan...I was wondering how we got so lucky as to not have him polluting the Plank over the past few weeks. Now I know and I say good for mini, good for Sullivan...and Sullivan can keep him.

- MrCookie1

August 31, 2007 at 2:25pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I too read Sullivan alot and while Andrew sometimes drives me nuts he does not deserve to suffer Jaime forever.

- awrobi01

August 31, 2007 at 4:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

poor, poor mini-me. is there no one to stick up for him...anybody? ....his mother? oh poor, poor mini

- blackton

August 31, 2007 at 5:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Hilzoy responds to all the Kirchick inanity on Andrew Sullivan's blog with a few questions for Kirchick:

Since I do not particularly want to be uncharitable, I'll just ask: Jamie, how do you conceive of your role as a journalist and blogger? What responsibilities do you think it involves? And how has your view of those responsibilities informed the posts I've mentioned above?

Given the amount of crap Kirchick has written on The Plank over the last year Hilzoy's questions seem long overdue. It is unfortunate that his co-host on another blog made them rather than one of his co-hosts on The Plank.

- ndmackenzie

August 31, 2007 at 7:13pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I was going to describe what is happening to Kirchick over at the dish as "a richly deserved spanking."

- jblumenfeld

August 31, 2007 at 9:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Steve Clemons lit into him too, and Greg Djerejian took him to task in an earlier post about Iran. It's like a bloc of WTF? in response to him over there.

- jpagano

September 1, 2007 at 1:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Boston Red Sox traded a perfectly good curveball pitcher named Bronson Arroyo for a very large, powerful outfielder named Wily Mo Pena (pronounced Penya). Unfortunately, it turned out that while Wily Mo was an absolute plumber in the field, he could not hit a curve ball, which soon enough was all he was seeing at the plate. Now what, I suppose you are wondering, does this have to do with James Kirchick? This: if you prematurely elevate a minor league player to the major leagues, it will be a disaster for all concerned. Neither Wily Mo nor James were ready for prime time. Maybe they never would be, or maybe they could grow into competent professionals if allowed to ripen in the minors. THe Red Sox ultimately traded Wily Mo to the Washington Nationals, almost a minor league team. When will TNR similarly end their failed experiment?

- JackR

September 1, 2007 at 9:42am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If only the opinions of readers here actually mattered as much as curveballs in Boston. No such luck, I'm afraid. Bush will rid himself of Cheney AND Maliki before TNR will respond to this obvious problem.

- purcellneil

September 4, 2007 at 10:50am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close