SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Will The Kitchen Sink Work?

THE PLANK OCTOBER 5, 2008

Will The Kitchen Sink Work?

With Sarah Palin's attack yesterday
on Barack Obama's patriotism and his ties to former Weather Underground
ringleader William Ayers, the McCain campaign has left little doubt
about in which direction it intends to head over the final month of the
campaign. Namely, they're going to drive their campaign into a ditch --
and hope they can find a way to take Obama along for the ride.It
is a sad denouement for what was one to be a high-minded campaign
focused around themes of honor and reform, themes that were
resuscitated briefly during the Republican Convention, possibly
accompanied by McCain's taking a one-term pledge. It is also, however, Mr. McCain's strategists would seem to have concluded, their only remaining hope.I
am not here to dispute that this is McCain's best strategy -- in the
same way that an onside kick is a team's best strategy when it trails
late in the game with no timeouts left. But like the onside kick, it is
fairly unlikely to work.For
one thing, increasing numbers of middle class Americans may already
have decided that Barack Obama is their home team. One of the more
powerful dynamics during the first Presidential debate is that Obama,
in the first 15 minutes of the proceedings, pointed to himself and
said, "Hey! Middle Class! I'm your guy!". McCain did not mention the
middle class, instead reverting to traditional Republican talking
points about supply-side economics. From there forward in that debate,
dial testers reacted poorly when McCain attacked Obama, or appeared to
be contemptuous of him.If this is the case, however -- and it
very well could be -- then this election is over. If the middle class
had decided that Barack Obama is their guy, then he's going to win. So
assume for a moment that there remain a sufficient number of
persuadable voters to provide McCain with a prospective path toward
victory.Even so, I think most observers have tended to
overstate the extent to which this election is in fact about Barack
Obama. It is also very much about John McCain. As I argued in the Los Angeles Times
in August, the principal reason why McCain has been able to remain in a
relatively tight race with Obama, even as the Republican brand is in
shambles, is because he has largely been able to distance his brand
from that of the Republicans. This is evidenced by the fact that
polling during the primaries indicated that Obama was in fact headed
toward a landslide victory against virtually any other Republican,
whether Mike Huckabee or Fred Thompson or Mitt Romney (though the later
might have had some interesting opportunities in light of the current
economic crisis). By contrast, for all the time her advisers spent
trumpeting her electability, Hillary Clinton never had more than a 3-point lead against McCain before exiting he race, and trailed him for much of the primary season.It
may be quite difficult for McCain to attack Obama in this fashion
without significantly damaging his own brand. The chart below presents
a smoothed curve of each candidate's net favorability ratings since the first of the year:What's
interesting is that, with the exception of the past couple of weeks,
McCain's and Obama's ratings have been fairly strongly correlated,
tending to rise and fall together. This is not to say that negative
campaigning doesn't work -- it sometimes does -- but it works at
diminished efficiency, because you may be giving back 50 cents on the
dollar by harming your approval scores.If the McCain campaign
brings up William Ayers -- or Jeremiah Wright -- it will almost
certianly be seen as attack politics. This might seem to be stating the
obvious. But remember that this wasn't
the case during the primaries. The Wright and Ayers stories were
instead driven by actual news -- ABC's reporting of Wright's
inflammatory sermons, for instance -- and were largely not pushed by the Clinton campaign. So unless McCain's oppo research team is sitting on some fresh
news about Obama's ties to Ayers or Wright, the stories are liable to
be reported as a typical partisan attack, which will impeach their
credibility in the public's eyes and reduce their staying power.The Obama campaign does face a bit of a dilemma. By responding to the attacks aggressively -- as they seem inclined to do
-- they may be able to mitigate their impact, and possibly turn them
around on John McCain. But they also keep the story in the news. The
Obama campaign can't afford to be swiftboated, but it also wants to be
careful not to make this the story for more than a couple of news cycles.Ultimately,
however, the fact that McCain is resorting to these sorts of attacks
are an indication of just how much his brand has been damaged.
They certainly aren't likely to help him to repair it.

--Nate SilverĀ 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 18 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

18 comments

How much of the 84 million of public financing that McCain accepted does he have left? Where is it being allocated? Is Palin going to drop verbal bombshells everyday hoping to get tons of free media, forcing Obama to redirect time, money, and effort to counteract them? Why doesn't Biden drop some bombshells of his own on McCain? Bring up McCain's extensive connections to organized crime?

- blackton

October 5, 2008 at 2:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"[T]he fact that McCain is resorting to these sorts of attacks are an indication of just how much his brand has been damaged."

More accurately, it is an indication that his "brand" was not based on the reality of his personal or professional character.

Watch for McCain to try to approach Obama in the next debate as he approached Romney in the later GOP primary debates: Ugly, negative, dishonest, and dishonorable. And it worked in the primaries -- in part because the fundamental authoritarianism of the conservative mindset eats that shit up, but it worked nonetheless.

- rhubarbs

October 5, 2008 at 2:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think we need to put Mike Murphy on suicide watch after this. This will be ugly:

“It’s McCain’s barn that’s on fire. … Thirty days out, I think McCain can win. But the fact is, [if the] election were held today, he’d lose. And I think he’s on a losing path.

“I think the McCain campaign has to look in the mirror now and decide, do we need to change up the strategy? They’ve been running the grinding campaign on Obama. There’s a lot of good things to attack Obama about – people have a lot of doubts about Obama. But they’ve got to fix McCain. McCain has to connect with voters on the economy. He’s got to get ticket-splitters. Get out of base Republican issues and get people who are worried about the economy and health care over. Or in this anti-Republican environment, this trend line is very, very bad.”

news.yahoo.com/.../14294

- rozenson

October 5, 2008 at 3:22pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think we need to put Mike Murphy on suicide watch after this. This will be ugly:

“It’s McCain’s barn that’s on fire. … Thirty days out, I think McCain can win. But the fact is, [if the] election were held today, he’d lose. And I think he’s on a losing path.

“I think the McCain campaign has to look in the mirror now and decide, do we need to change up the strategy? They’ve been running the grinding campaign on Obama. There’s a lot of good things to attack Obama about – people have a lot of doubts about Obama. But they’ve got to fix McCain. McCain has to connect with voters on the economy. He’s got to get ticket-splitters. Get out of base Republican issues and get people who are worried about the economy and health care over. Or in this anti-Republican environment, this trend line is very, very bad.”

news.yahoo.com/.../14294

- rozenson

October 5, 2008 at 3:22pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Time to bring up Charles Keating. Keating, Milken, and Boesky all went to jail for their crimes relating to the $200 billion Savings & Loan scandal, precipitated by Reagan's deregulation - "Garn-St. Germain" - of the S&L industry.

The past is prologue to the future: George Sr. took a page out of that playbook, as did George Jr., and more deregulation led to more, bigger crimes. McCain was a crony of Keatiing, ran offense for Reagan on deregulation, and has supported all of the financial pirates over the years, never voting for regulation, always on the side of the robber barons.

What delicious irony to see him calling for Cox to be fired, when Cox is a member of the club. But he aslo turned on Keating, as he turned on Abramoff, when he saw the prosecutors heading his way.

- fougasseu

October 5, 2008 at 3:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"t is a sad denouement for what was one to be a high-minded campaign focused around themes of honor and reform...."

Says who? Sure, McCain said that those would be the themes of his campaign, but he has never lived by them this time around, not even in the Republican primaries. Remember he Paris and Britney ad? He was relentlessly negative all summer, and his speech in the RNC was the only moment he has stressed these positive themes. And, quite obviously, it was the one major speech at the RNC that was not like all the others. His campaign against Obama has been low-minded from the start.

- JEFF FREY

October 5, 2008 at 3:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Guilt by association is a dangerous game. We might, for instance, point out that Palin has been sleeping with a man who joined a party that thinks so little of America that it advocates succession from the country. This didn't happen when Sarah Palin was eight years old, and as a gubernatorial candidate she spoke at the party's 2006 convention. As governor she told the party, "Keep up the good work!"

Palling around with people who don't see America the way you and I do? Check the mirror, Sarah.

www.nytimes.com/.../04party.html

- Wasatcher

October 5, 2008 at 3:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'd say the bigger thing is this: What is she doing having a rally the other day in California?  Are they really dumb enough to think that they could win CA?

- Crock1701

October 5, 2008 at 4:12pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

But, Wasatcher, the AIP people hate government, which makes them true patriots as Sarah sees it.

- JEFF FREY

October 5, 2008 at 4:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Who did not know this was coming? Particularly since we were TOLD it was coming from the guy who left McCain's campaign. Was that Mike Murphy? I forgot his name.

- psantillana

October 5, 2008 at 4:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

JF -- Yes, I know. The frightening thing about a narcissistic/messianic view of the world is the utter confidence its proponents have in their own rightness. So we have Bob Woodward's revelation that W's "strategy" in waging war on Iraq amounted to, "They're assholes." Then we have Palin's restatement of the same doctrine that all you have to do in a foreign policy situation is decide who are the "bad guys." For these people the world boils down to good v. evil, and they are the sole deciders of which is which. This is the road to... those unspeakable incendiary words. The other "F" word and the other "N" word.

- Wasatcher

October 5, 2008 at 4:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shh, don't tell anyone (McCain will go negative and he and Sarah will lie). I'm not saying Obama prefers to be attacked but they know McCain needs a positive message or a least some attention and telling lies at this point won't accomplish either goal for McCain-Palin.

Consider: Both conventions had saturation size audiences and Obama and Biden benefited among independents in the two debates which had larger audiences. Oh, McCain will appear with Barack on the same stage...two more times. I'll also wager Barack has more than a few endorsements in his pocket and hasn't had to play those cards because he's gaining without them.

Obama doesn't need to follow McCain into the ditch because the two face to face meetings allow the opportunity for Johnny to be called on the tactics. Each endorsement will not only draw positive attention to Barack, but McCain should have waited till Tuesday's debate so he could do-offer-propose something dramatic and not compete with defending these tactics. He can be as crazy as he wants in the debate and as he fires up his base he'll crawl deeper into that bunker. The issues, his policies and circumstances don't favor him and he'll hand over his remaining currency to Obama. His popularity and positives are based on a legend and he appears less heroic with each assault that is exposed as a lie and is less stable as he shouts insults.

I don't think "the story" will be the substance of McCain's attacks and the news cycles will dissect the why of McCain's desperation rather than the what of his message. His stories are so old they stink like a rotting cadaver. I think Obama should reply but keep the focus on McCain's pathetic approach rather than dignify the particulars of each McCain volley.

- michael

October 5, 2008 at 5:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Kitchen Sink Worked for Clinton. There are no caucuses in GE.

- jacobt1

October 5, 2008 at 5:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yesterday, the Times ran a big story on Ayres.  Today, a big story on Fannie Mae.  Did their best to shield Obama and the Dems in Congress.  I don't think the Ayres connection, whatever it is, will lose Obama any votes he was going to get, but I think Fannie Mae is not helpful.  Even the MSM can't avoid the facts that Fannie and Freddie were the Dem's toy and that the Dems resisted any interference with the "mission" of facilitating mortgages for people who could not qualify by any rational standard.  Some of the peepul who have been mad as hell at the usual suspect, Bush, may yet find out that Barney and Dodd are not the best buddies they thought they were.

- lsernoff

October 5, 2008 at 5:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"The Kitchen Sink Worked for Clinton. There are no caucuses in GE."

The Toilet Sink Works for Jacon.  That's Where He Lives.

- icarusr

October 5, 2008 at 5:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Rhubs and JEFF - I agree and have no idea why people who should know better keep parrotting the "honour" line.  The man is a charlatan and a knave; there is no honour in his bones, and we have known that the moment Bush savaged his daughter and McCain chose to become Bush's bitch.  So please, if you want to talk about the "theme" or the "brand" - whatever that means, he is not a chocolate bar, but a nasty piece of work - you should put those in quotes.

We knew, of course, that this was coming - we have Jacon reminding us of the gutter in which POWPOW and the Palin live and from which they nourish themselves and their base.  And, in fact, we have seen it before - in the "white Americans" quip, in the "American President" quip, and now this direct calling of Obama an unAmerican traitor.  We've seen this movie and it has not worked; I am confident that, in any event, Obama is ready.  Remember, there are two more debates, and Obama will be able to challenge McCain directly on these.  Let the old goat sputter and mutter ... he will be even more irrelevant than he is now.

- icarusr

October 5, 2008 at 5:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

icarusr- Rolling Stone weighs in (thoroughly) on the McCain As Dishonorable Knave theme you so deliciously articulated. All should take the time to read it, if only to remind you of why it's okay to abhor the McCain the Man, McCain the Hypocrite, and McCain the uncurious Conservative.

www.rollingstone.com/.../print

- thetraytiger

October 5, 2008 at 6:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The last four weeks of this election will be about whether the American people are willing to turn our economy and national security over to Barack Obama, a man with little record, questionable judgment, and ties to radical figures like unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers. Americans need to ask themselves if they’ve ever befriended an unrepentant terrorist, or had a convicted felon help them buy their house — because those aren’t smears, those are true facts about Barack Obama.

But regardless of whether it “works,” it is important that Obama and future candidates understand that their behavior (e.g. choosing to serve on the Woods Fund which doled out money to ACORN and a host of radical groups), their choice of associations (from Rezko to Ayers to Walsh) and their fundamental beliefs expressed through not just speeches but deeds (e.g.  supporting the philosophy and goals of the Ayers-founded and led Annenberg Challenge) are open to scrutiny and deserve a full vetting by the voters

www.commentarymagazine.com/.../35561

- jacobt1

October 5, 2008 at 6:40pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close