SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home You Think the American Relationship With Pakistan Is Fraught...

THE PLANK DECEMBER 3, 2009

You Think the American Relationship With Pakistan Is Fraught Now...

...but just imagine if this scenario had played out:

Shortly after 9/11, President Bush had issued a “lethal finding,” giving the C.I.A. the go-ahead to kill or capture al-Qaeda members. (Under an executive order issued by President Gerald Ford, it had been illegal since 1976 for U.S. intelligence operatives to conduct assassinations.)...

Among the team’s targets, according to a source familiar with the program, was Mamoun Darkazanli, an al-Qaeda financier living in Hamburg who had been on the agency’s radar for years because of his ties to three of the 9/11 hijackers and to operatives convicted of the 1998 bombings of U.S. Embassies in East Africa. The C.I.A. team supposedly went in “dark,” meaning they did not notify their own station—much less the German government—of their presence; they then followed Darkazanli for weeks and worked through the logistics of how and where they would take him down. Another target, the source says, was A. Q. Khan, the rogue Pakistani scientist who shared nuclear know-how with Iran, Libya, and North Korea. The C.I.A. team supposedly tracked him in Dubai. In both cases, the source insists, the authorities in Washington chose not to pull the trigger. [Italics Mine]

This is taken from Vanity Fair's profile of Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater (now known as Xe). Prince had been chosen by the C.I.A. to help train the team. Anyway, if the Agency had assassinated Khan, one can only imagine what the repercussions would have been. Khan is considered a hero by many Pakistanis for his role as the "father" of the country's nuclear program.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

"Anyway, if the Agency had assassinated Khan, one can only imagine what the repercussions would have been." You mean, "If the Agency had sent a press release taking credit for assassinating Khan, one can only imagine ..." since part of the intended purpose of a secret hit squad is to make the killing, you know, secret. These are people, including Khan, with deadly enemies other than the United States. I'm not so sure that a world in which the average Pakistani can't be certain whether Uncle Sam, the ISI, or the Libyans car-bombed AQ Khan is such a terrible alternate reality.

- rhubarbs

December 3, 2009 at 3:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with rhubarbs, one would think the CIA would have intended to kill Khan covertly, so then the Pakistani's wouldn't know who did it.

- acria multa

December 3, 2009 at 4:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

seconding rhub, and of course this ignores the fact that it might have been made to look like an accident or, even better, a heart attack or sudden illness. The headline "Khan dies of pneumonia, Pakistanis blame America" seems unlikely, even among the people of Pakistan.

- blackton

December 3, 2009 at 6:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

They would blame America, but the thing is, they'd never be sure.

- ironyroad

December 3, 2009 at 6:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You mean it's too late for "this scenario to play out"? Why's that?

- Robert Powell

December 5, 2009 at 6:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close