THE SPINE DECEMBER 2, 2007
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
There's no mistake about it: "Iran has hardened its position on its nuclear program," according to a New York Times article by Elaine Sciolino. This was made clear by Saeed Jalili, Iran's new representative to his country's talks with the six powers, the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany. Sciolino reports that, "The first hour and a half of the meeting on Friday was described as a monologue, with Mr. Jalili speaking about the will of the Iranian people to support nuclear enrichment, theology, God, even his doctoral thesis, according to several officials who spoke under the condition of anonymity under diplomatic rules."
Here's a quote from Jalili himself: "Everything in the past is past, and with me, you start over. None of your proposals has any standing." Just in case his listeners didn't understand, he added. "There is no longer an Iranian nuclear problem." The matter is "closed."Javier Solana, the seemingly designated representative of the European Union to all failed negotiations and the E.U.'s foreign policy chief, told reporters he was "disappointed." The French representative, with the liberating candor of Sarkozy and Kouchner, characterized the meeting as a "disaster." And more: "We have in front of us the real Iran."Are the Democrats listening? The Iranians are, in fact, forcing the grim realities on the world...and particularly on the Democrats who are still spouting about negotiations and diplomacy. Certainly no Democratic candidate has been candid with the American people on Iran and no Democratic candidate has been candid with himself...or herself. I believe this is, long-term, disastrous politics. But there are more important issues than how the Democratic Party fares.
3 comments
I guess invading Iraq was a mistake huh? Since it completely circumscribes what we can do about Iran.
- bsdespain
December 2, 2007 at 5:22pm
BTW Marty diplomacy needs to be backed up by a credible military threat. While we can certainly drop bombs, there is little else the US military can do. The Democrats didn't put us in this situation either.
- bsdespain
December 2, 2007 at 5:24pm
"...there are more important issues than how the Democratic Party fares."
Hmmm...could have fooled me, listening to the current crop of presidential wannabes and press corps syncophants. I think you are right, Marty, but the Dem base sure doesn't seem to agree.
And bsdespain, some would argue that a certain Democrat named Carter singlehandedly did more---in just 4 short years---to create the current Iranian/Hezbollah mess than everyone else combined in the decades since. The Repubs have been cleaning up those droppings for a long time, and as Marty points out, if the new president turns out to be a democrat, he/she isn't going to be given the luxury of ignoring it (the way Clinton did in the 90s).
- dlrocdoc
December 3, 2007 at 3:45pm