SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home A Curious Footnote To The Bailout

THE SPINE OCTOBER 13, 2008

A Curious Footnote To The Bailout

I mean the $89 billion bailout of AIG (plus some out of other baskets here
and there).

The FT reports this morning that, despite the huge and unprecedented
bailout by the feds, the humungous insurance group will continue its
spending on lobbying the feds. So the American tax-payer will be not
subsidizing, but actually shelling out millions of dollars to finance AIG's
efforts to drag more cash out of the system -and perhaps also to have
another half million dollar retreat at a swish and swank resort as it did
right after receiving its bundle of cash relief.

Are there no limits?

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

Isn't lobbying what Washington is all about? Why should we be surprised that when we reward lobbying we beget more lobbying. BF Skinner would have understood this, if Marty does not.

"Are there no limits?"  No, not yet.  State socialism and cronyism go hand in hand, in Hitler's  Germany, Stalin's Russia, present-day China. Why not here too?

The founding fathers recognized that if you wanted to limit corruption, you had to limit government. Trillion-dollar blank checks, however justified,  do not conduce to limited government.

- bmichell

October 14, 2008 at 5:30am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Hey bmichell, easy with state socialism - what you say is a bald lie. This is not state socialism, it's monopolist capitalism, robber-baron capitalism.

If you want to see state socialism, go and visit France. There socialism works - at least the government gives something for the control, such as universal health care and public education. If only the Americans had French health care!

Socialism may be undesirable because of too much control, but at least it gives PEOPLE something. The Republican US version is a combination of late feudalism and early capitalism: it takes the citizens' money and gives to the RICH.

- sleepyavl

October 14, 2008 at 10:54am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, sleepy, more and more often I find myself in complete agreement with you, although your tone is still a little strong for my taste.

- roidubouloi

October 14, 2008 at 2:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Well, sleepy, more and more often I find myself in complete agreement with you"

The same in my case.

And I even like the style.

- luispc

October 14, 2008 at 3:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you guys. I read your posts with interest, and sometimes in agreement too - though I just rarely have time to comment these days, compared to some months ago (but that's just as well).

- sleepyavl

October 15, 2008 at 1:20am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close