The Spine

A Different Explanation For The Cia Tapes


Frum, a conservative journalist and public intellectual, often has revealing
insights into matters that are bogged down in cliches.  Here he goes back to a book by Gerald Posner
dealing with some of the secrets of 9/11. 
It is nothing if not fascinating. 
But it also sounds true to me.

Question About Those Destroyed CIA Tapes


prevailing assumption is that the tapes were destroyed to conceal harsh
CIA interrogation methods. Gerald Posner suggests another possible explanation:

the breaking news that the CIA destroyed the videotapes of interrogations with
2 terror suspects, you might have seen that the tapes of the interrogation of
Abu Zubaydah were destroyed.

might also recall that in my 2003 NYT bestseller (reached #2), Why America
Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, my last chapter was titled, "The
Interrogation."  Based on two active
intelligence sources, I was the first to disclose Zubaydah's interrogation. To
date, I am the only reporter to have printed the info about what happened to him.


wounded when he was captured in Pakistan,
was fooled in a fake flag operation to believe that the Saudis held him. Instead
of being afraid of the Saudis, he demanded to talk to three Saudi princes (one,
the nephew of the King, who happened to be in the U.S. on 9/11).  He gave his interrogators the private cell
phone numbers of all 3. He did the same regarding the chief of Pakistan's air force.


the U.S.
told the Saudis and Pakistanis of Zubaydah's finger pointing, all four men had
tragic 'accidents.'  The King's nephew
died of complications from liposuction at the age of 43. A day later, the 41
year old Prince named by Zubaydah died in a one-car accident on his way to the
funeral of the King's nephew. The third named prince, age 25, died a week later
of "thirst," according to the Saudi Royal Court. And shortly after that,
the chief of Pakistan's
air force died when his plane exploded with his wife and 15 of his top aides on


my book was published, CIA officials trashed it 'off the record,' but made no
public comment.  I have always held the
same position.  There is (or was) firm
evidence of what transpired, of whether my reporting was accurate or not. Make
the interrogation tapes
public and then we'll know whether one of the top al-Qaeda operatives accused
leading Saudi royals and a top Pakistani military man--now all dead--of being
his sponsors. And accused two of them the King;s nephew and the Pakistani Air
Force chief of having advance knowledge  of the 9/11 attacks.  Now, suddenly coincidence of coincidence, the
CIA says the Zubaydah interrogation tapes are destroyed.  How convenient.


For more stories, like the New Republic on Facebook:

Loading Related Articles...
Article Tools

Show all 3 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.