SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Lebanon War Iii

THE SPINE NOVEMBER 17, 2006

Lebanon War Iii

The United Nations performs again. And also the Lebanese army. Well, not exactly. According to Security Council Resolution 1701, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which has been there for almost three fruitless decades, was supposed to be beefed up (that is, tripled in size) with real soldiers and given more arms and to perform the task of peace-keeping more--shall we say?--aggressively. Lebanon's army was supposed to displace and replace Hezbollah in the south.

Everybody knows that none of this has happened. Including the Israelis who for some reason ran from the place as soon as a cease-fire was agreed upon. That cease-fire is a vapid document, like most U.N. documents. 1701 is now a dead letter. The evidence piles up, and nobody seems to care. A Jerusalem Post correspondent, Jacey Herman, sneaked into Lebanon and filed a dispatch this morning, datelined Baalbeck in the north, reporting on the brazen movement of weapons from Lebanon. Soon they will be deployed, and then there will be Lebanon War III. But this time, Israel won't leave the theatre until the play is really over.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 4 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

4 comments

from the U.N., which is so pathetically ineffective it actually increases the danger to global security rather decreases it. The lethal kabuki dance continues...

- Claudiusmarcellus

November 17, 2006 at 1:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

- purcellneil

November 17, 2006 at 1:40pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

George W. Bush and Condi Rice trusted the United nations. This has turned out to be a serious mistake. Israel should have finished the job.

- thomsondavid

November 18, 2006 at 12:10am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

They didn't, I think -- it's just that Israel's muddy performance and uncertain goals vis-a-vis Hezbollah left them with no choice but to "settle" it in the UN. Remember, Bush & Rice resisted early calls for a forced cease-fire for much longer than even the Israelis expected. It was Olmert who seemed to have wanted a UN intervention to stop the conflict which he subsequently potrayed as the main Israel's achievement in the war.

- sabaka

November 18, 2006 at 5:30pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close