THE STUDY FEBRUARY 22, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Today, President Obama will propose cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent—a move that has reportedly been in the works for a couple of years, but which is also timed to increase the president’s reelection prospects. Business groups and Republicans frequently complain that the U.S. corporate tax rate is too high, but others say that the many loopholes and deductions in the tax code tend to keep the effective rate well below the statutory rate. How much do American corporations actually pay?
A 2005 study on corporate tax avoidance suggests that, over the long run, many corporations pay taxes well below the 35 percent statutory rate. The study’s authors analyzed nearly 2,000 firms and found that 437 of them (about one-fifth of the sample) paid an effective tax rate of less than 20 percent over a ten-year period—all during a time when the statutory rate was 35 percent. (The authors defined effective rates as “the ratio of cash taxes paid to pretax financial accounting income.”) If these low-paying firms had been paying their taxes at the 35 percent rate over that period, they would have owed, in aggregate, over $450 billion dollars. “Instead,” the authors write, “these firms received tax refunds in aggregate totaling $205 billion, according to the cash tax paid number disclosed in their financial statements.” On average, the ten-year rate for all firms surveyed was just under 30 percent. That number may seem low, but the authors warn against seeing it as evidence of wrongdoing: “It is important to emphasize that our measure of tax avoidance does not imply that firms are engaging in anything improper. There are numerous provisions in the tax code that allow or encourage firms to reduce their taxes.”
1 comments
Of course, the implication is that lowering the tax rate will increase compliance and overall tax collections. But compliance has little if anything to do with the low effective tax rates paid by corporations. By far the biggest reason is the tax treatment of international corporations, which (if incorporated in the US) can defer US taxation of international earnings for a long period or (if incorporated in a tax haven) can defer US taxation of international earnings forever. The next biggest reason is the tax treatment of earnings from investments in other corporations (insurance companies invest heavily in other corporations), only a fraction of which are taxed to the receiving corporation. And the third biggest reason is heavy investments in plant and equipment, for which the investing corporation gets to expenses or amortize the cost, something to be encouraged not discouraged; in making the announcement, Obama singled out manufacturing as the sector he would give preferential tax treatment because manufacturing creates high-paying jobs. This is a long-winded way of saying that lowering the tax rate to 28% from 35% will accomplish nothing, besides lowering the overall tax bill of corporations.
- rayward
February 24, 2012 at 1:36pm