THE STUDY DECEMBER 19, 2011
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Shock at the news of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il’s death is giving way to nervousness about what might come next for the already-unstable Korean peninsula. The initial signs are that Kim Jong-un, the deceased leader’s youngest son, will succeed his father. But will the country’s elites accept Kim Jong-un as a leader? What are the chances of internal opposition, or even a coup against the Kim dynasty?
Because North Korea is so isolated, predicting its future is notoriously difficult. But a 2010 paper in the journal International Security suggests that the regime may not be fully prepared for this transition. The authors, Daniel Byman of Georgetown and Jennifer Lind of Dartmouth, noted that while “Kim Jong-il is likely to leave power not because of mutinous cadres or angry masses, but because he dies in office,” his regime had still “not laid the groundwork for a smooth transition.” Kim Jong-il himself had been named as his father’s successor nearly a decade and a half before he actually took power. During that time, the authors note, he was able to consolidate power and build up his own cult of personality. But by the time this article was published, Kim Jong-il had still not named his own successor—his son Kim Jong-un was merely rumored to be next in line. “In the absence of such preparations—for example, in the event of Kim Jong-il’s abrupt death,” the authors warn, “contested succession is more likely, the selectorate [the regime elite] may be divided, and the security forces may not know whom to turn to for orders, making regime collapse a possibility.”
2 comments
I complained this morning about no North Korea posts at TNR. I am glad to see this one. I wrote more about North Korea in the Havel thread, so I won't repeat those words here. In the days when much of the world believed in the "Divine Right of Kings," society had a fairly well-established system of regime change, though it broke down from time to time (War of the Roses, etc.) So Saudi Arabia, though unstable, has managed with some success over the years to pass on the power without too much bloodshed and commotion. With the evolution of representative government, humans have had some moderate (though not infallible) success in constructively transferring political power. Regimes such as North Korea illustrate the worst possible situation. They pretend to believe in something besides naked nihilistic monster power (in this case they pretend to believe in Communism), where they actually believe in "My genes shall rule forever) [the old King system] without the techniques and skills developed over centuries of royal rule. As the post intimates...calamity and disaster are very likely to be the result.
- skahn
December 19, 2011 at 10:15pm
I rather suspect the reason for so few North Korea posts on TNR is that nobody outside of North Korea and China knows a damn thing about NK's internal politics. They don't call it the "Hermit Kingdom" for nothing.
- Dausuul
December 20, 2011 at 9:44am