SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Newt Gingrich's Desperate French-Bashing

THE STUDY JANUARY 16, 2012

Newt Gingrich's Desperate French-Bashing

Newt Gingrich released a new ad last week attacking Mitt Romney’s many ideological heresies, as well as—wait for it—his ability to speak French. It’s a strange attack, since Gingrich has engaged in self-flattery by comparing himself to Charles de Gaulle (who famously also spoke French). Newt seems to be relying on the power of 2003-style French-bashing to secure conservative votes. Will it work?

Polling data suggests that Gingrich’s gambit has limited and fading appeal. Gallup, which regularly polls Americans on their views of foreign countries, found in 2011 that France ranked 6th among 20 countries featured in the survey, with 71 percent of Americans expressing a favorable view. Opinions of France hit a nadir in March of 2003, when only 34 percent of Americans expressed a positive view of the country, but since then they’ve rebounded steadily, and today they’re nearly back at pre-Iraq War levels. Favorable opinions of France are even on the rise among Republicans: In 2006, 45 percent expressed approval, and by 2010 that number had reached 52 percent. If this move strikes you as desperate, you’re onto something—once Gingrich loses South Carolina and Florida, as he almost surely will, you can expect an eventual concession to his hated Francophone adversaire. 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

The most famous of American Francophiles has to be Jefferson (well, maybe Franklin, but only because of the ladies). With Jefferson, it came at the expense of our "special relationship" with the British: Jefferson loathed the British. Let's square this circle: Jefferson is the favorite founder among the conservatives, especially the tea partiers, yet he adored the French and loathed the British, while today's conservatives distrust everything French and accuse Obama of jeopardizing our "special relationship" with the British. Go figure.

- rayward

January 16, 2012 at 5:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Two of my relatives have been fine linguists. My cousin (no longer alive) became fluent in French, Spanish, and Chinese. One of my brothers (still alive) became fluent in French, German, Wolof [language in Senegal], and I think he has picked up some Japanese as well. I am a linguistic nincompoop, studying without success first Spanish and then French. To engage in stereotypes (something I usually rail against), my French teachers were arrogant snots who regarded their American students as puerile ignoramuses. However, the worst of my French teachers in this regard was born and raised in Paraguay, and thus strove (successfully) to be even more obnoxious than the genuine French. As a footnote, my daughter attended for a while an international college in Canada where many of the students were Quebeqouis (French-speaking Canadian students). Two students from France were also attending the same school. The French students were appalled by the accents and dialects of the French-Canadian students, and generously offered to teach them how to speak "correct" French. The French-Canadian students were not amused (my daughter informed me.) If you read this comment and are now wondering, "Why did I read this?" that is a good question, though I am not sure of the reason for the original post, either. I think I will go read the Onion, which is sometimes (well, often) funnier than I am.

- skahn

January 16, 2012 at 7:36pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, skahn can go read the Onion; I would like to go to Paris, even though Romney was there.

- Sophia

January 16, 2012 at 11:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Rayward observes: "Jefferson is the favorite founder among the conservatives, especially the tea partiers, yet he adored the French and loathed the British...today's conservatives distrust everything French and accuse Obama of jeopardizing our "special relationship" with the British. Go figure." What I figure is these conservatives don't particularly know squat about what Jefferson really thought or believed in, nor are they particularly interested in contemplating the conficts & contradictions that are embodied in this person, one of unending complexity and contradiction. Mostly they don't get the whole Enlightenment thing - what it meant to Jefferson & his educated contemporaries who revered Classical learning, the Greek and Latin basis of our culture's science, law, government, and respect for rational discourse. That's all been forgotten. Nowadays arch conservatives want to believe that the founders were a bunch of bible-packin' fundamentalists, who didn't look much beyond the bible for inspiration or information. You don't hear many conservatives lauding, for instance, Jefferson's authorshipof the Virginia Statute for Religous Freedom ("....,our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions in physics or geometry...."), which Jefferson proudly included among the most significant achievements of his life. Our modern day conservatives like a really simple story, told simply, by simpletons.

- Haole45

January 16, 2012 at 11:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As I understand it (meaning I read it somewhere), Gingrich lived for a few years in France as a child and speaks some French, though I suspect he only knows the French words for frankly, dramatically, fundamentally, and, above all, I. He also sports a $25,000 Patek Philippe, "the Rolls Royce of wristwatches." (see, cover photo, New York Times Magazine, 1 March 2009). It's possible, though I will leave it to the forensic psychologists to pin down, that Gingrich's childhood sojourn among the Gallic people explains his Napoleonic complex. Dan

- dbuck1

January 17, 2012 at 7:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You left out "quite frankly", Gingrich's signal that he's about to tell a whopper. I've mentioned before that my late father in law, a southern barrister, loved to tell tall tales, the tallest tales he'd preface with "this is the truth". Jesus uses the same signal ("this is the truth") in the Gospels, though I believe He really meant it is the truth. Now that Gingrich is an evangelical Catholic (two words that don't seem to belong together), maybe soon he will replace "quite frankly" with "this is the truth".

- rayward

January 17, 2012 at 9:52am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close