THE STUMP MARCH 20, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

If Rick Santorum loses as handily in today’s Illinois primary as the polls predict, it will be interesting to see if he expands on his eye-opening new tack: going after Mitt Romney’s lucrative years at Bain Capital. Until this week, Santorum had stood out among Romney’s GOP challengers for refusing to hammer him on his business background, arguing that it was un-conservative for Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman to take up that attack. I remember asking him in Somersworth, N.H., what he made of Romney’s comment that day that he “like[s] being able to fire people who provide services to me,” and having Santorum respond with a reluctant mumble. His reluctance to engage Romney on this front has been particularly striking given that Santorum is appealing to a downscale slice of the Republican electorate that would presumably be open to an anti-Bain message. In 2008, Santorum's social-conservative precursor, Mike Huckabee, gleefully went at Romney’s Bain background, saying that Romney “looks like the guy who fires you.” But not Santorum.
Until now, that is. In recent days, the Santorum campaign has clearly decided to rethink its abstemiousness on Bain. Yesterday morning, Santorum’s top strategist, John Brabender, challenged Romney’s business credentials by declaring (accurately) on MSNBC: “While Mitt Romney was at Bain Capital, almost one out of every four companies they were involved in either went bankrupt or out of business.” Later yesterday, Santorum followed up with this on the stump in Rockford, Illinois: “I heard Governor Romney here called me an economic lightweight because I wasn’t a Wall Street financier like he was. Do you think that’s the experience we need? Someone who’s going to take and look after, as he did, his friends on Wall Street and bail them out at the expense of Main Street America?’’
Keep an eye on this. Gingrich et al’s earlier attacks on Bain unquestionably softened up Romney for the Democratic attacks that will come on the same score in the months ahead (though I’ve argued that the attacks were far less influential with Republican primary voters in Newt’s brief flash of glory in South Carolina as others believe.) If Santorum now starts hammering hard on Bain as well, there’ll be quiet cheers in Chicago.
5 comments
Remember Tom Sayer getting the other boys to paint the fence for him? Obama's got all the Republican candidates doing the "tarring" of each other for him. http://www.netplaces.com/bedtime-stories/how-tom-sawyer-painted-a-fence/
- skahn
March 20, 2012 at 4:48pm
Mr. Santorum can speak badly of Mr. Romney if Mr. Santorum is trying to deny the leader the magic number. It's a gamble.
- Doug12
March 20, 2012 at 4:50pm
I have listened to Romney say the president is in over his head and Santorum is a light weight. And I have listened to Romney talk abou his cadillacs and how little money $374,000.00 is. I would like Doonesbury to caricature Romney as a Talking Wallet, like he did Bush W as an empty hat and Quayle as a feather.
- Nusholtz
March 20, 2012 at 5:51pm
Semms like a Doonesbury cartoon attack on Republicans is a ticket to victory. I'd like fewer cartoons attacking Republican candidates and more Democratic victories.
- arnon1
March 20, 2012 at 9:47pm
It's a gamble that's worth taking if you know you can't win with things as they stand today and are looking for your "high risk, high reward" ticket out of the doldrums. (See: Palin, Sarah) And Romney's
IllinoisChicago metro-area victory is the doldrums as it may even the race in Louisiana and tempt him to pull an upset in Pennsylvania. I know Santorum's people aren't reading this, but for the life of me I can't imagine why their campaign isn't attacking Bain for its business practices. Sure, they invested in companies and laid off people. But complete the circle. Mitt's experience in the private sector was making bets, loading up on debt, and walking away with a profit. Every day the Republican candidates attack Obama's deficit spending. Mitt's record "in the real economy" suggests that he would fleece the American consumer and throw us into even worse debt while making sure he gets a tax break that regular Americans don't. That's more toxic than Greece's debt rating. Run with it, Rick.- chaitless
March 21, 2012 at 12:21am