THE STUMP MAY 2, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

My Stump-mate Noam has been doing a nice job of tracking the shift in approach from Team Obama’s “new politics” campaign in 2008 to its more mundane, grind-it-out strategy this time around. He zeroed in on the exact right example—Chicago’s emphasis on trying to score points on manufactured kerfuffles such as the Republican National Committee chairman’s ironic (and if you ask me, innocuous) comparison of women to caterpillars. Four years ago, candidate Obama would have scorned that sort of game-playing.
But I think that all of us political reporters need to be careful not to overstate the contrast between the two campaigns. Yes, Team Obama just put out a tough ad attacking Mitt Romney for outsourcing jobs at Bain Capital and for his Swiss bank account. But let’s not forget—they were putting out some pretty tough, and arguably unfair, ads and mailings back in 2008, as well. They hammered Hillary Clinton for requiring that everyone buy health insurance or pay a penalty (wait, isn’t that...yeah) and over her support for the passage of NAFTA during her husband’s administration, attacks that provoked a memorable tirade from her (“shame on you, Barack Obama!”). During the general election, Obama went after John McCain for supporting a huge tax increase—McCain’s proposal to replace the tax exemption for employer-provided health care with a new tax provision that would make health insurance partly deductible for all taxpayers, including those who buy health insurance for themselves. The plan had major flaws, but Obama’s attack seriously distorted it, and a limited version of McCain’s idea—cutting back on the tax preference for employer-provided insurance—has also made it into Obama’s health care law, in the form of a tax on high-priced employer-provided health plans. All told, tallies after the 2008 campaign found that at least two-thirds of Obama’s ads in the general election were negative attacks on McCain. So even in ’08, hope and change went only so far.
follow me on Twitter @AlecMacGillis
4 comments
Sure did, especially when it came to that idiotic mandate that he skewered Clinton with.
- rayward
May 2, 2012 at 5:47pm
Wait?? You mean candidates say (and msot likely always have) extreme things to court the favor of an easily inpressionable and uninformed American public that rarely bothers to fact check what they see in political adds? Of course Obama is going to "play rough," it's politics.
- ARealHero
May 2, 2012 at 6:14pm
It has been written that Romney's forte is playing devils advocate, punching holes in the ideas of other people. That has been his campaign. Obama made it worse; Obama is wrong about bailouts; Obama needs to have a mandate; Obama is in over his head; Obama shouldn't move heaven and earth to find Bin Laden; Obama apologizes too much; America can do better but Obama can't. No facts, no details, no ideas of his own on those issues, just raw criticism. The temptation to give him a taste of his own medicine is too hard to resist.
- Nusholtz
May 2, 2012 at 9:31pm
A lot of us were pretty upset on Hillary's behalf.
- Sophia
May 3, 2012 at 12:12pm