THE STUMP NOVEMBER 7, 2011
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Bill Clinton's helpfulness to the Democratic cause just keeps on coming. First there was his interview in September with Newsmax -- yes, Newsmax -- in which he was so unenthusiastic about President Obama's proposal to raise taxes on the wealthy that his comments were quickly featured in an ad produced by Karl Rove's Crossroads group. Now comes Clinton with a new entry to the literary genre that has to be the only one ranking lower than the candidate's campaign tract -- the post-candidate's armchair quarterbacking tract.
I have not yet managed to get my hands on "Back to Work" (isn't that the name of a Romney or Perry ad?) but the Washington Post reports:
President Obama and his Democratic allies made two key political missteps in recent years, according to former president Bill Clinton in a new book to be released Tuesday. First was not raising the federal debt ceiling in the first two years of the president’s term, when Democrats still had a majority in Congress, and then failing to devise an effective national campaign message during the midterm elections of 2010. Clinton also suggests, obliquely, that Obama’s criticism of Wall Street has been too harsh and counterproductive.
So, the president who got rid of the Glass-Steagall wall that kept the big banks in check, whose appointees blocked Brooksley Born from regulating derivatives, and who lowered the capital gains tax rate -- all actions that arguably contributed to the financial collapse and today's soaring inequality -- is now abetting bankers' complaints that Obama has been too hard on Wall Street? O-kay....This only makes me feel less sorry for having included the former president on my list of suggestions for future occupation.
The book is apparently not limited to subtle criticisms of the sitting Democratic president. There are also many great ideas for creating jobs:
The United States doesn’t have to swallow too many camels to get back on a path of growth, the former president argues. Rather, we just have to embrace our inner technocrats and abandon our foolish ways. Collecting one-quarter of the $345 billion in “taxes that are owed but unpaid every year” and putting just one-third of today’s no-bid contracts out to competition “could reduce the annual deficit by more than $100 billion a year,” Clinton writes. He also embraces controversial big ideas, such as the Congressional Progressive Caucus’s plan to raise the maximum taxable limit on Social Security earnings.
As Daniel Gross, reviewing the book in the Post, notes, though, there's just one little problem with Clinton's recommendations.
“Back to Work” contains sensible ideas that have been floating around think tanks, policy conferences and White House brainstorming sessions for years. But given the current configuration of power in Washington and the near-blanket opposition by Republicans to White House economic proposals — even to measures they had previously supported — we seem to be stuck. Many of the ideas in this book could be enacted only in the unlikely event that Democrats sweep the 2012 elections and recover control of the House and a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
If people were just a little more reasonable and open to these common-sense ideas, the nation could start fixing some of its problems and recover its economic self-esteem. But Clinton doesn’t offer much practical advice on how a Democrat can move smart policy through the congressional buzz saw. And that’s a shame. Because by and large, Obama has already embraced the policies in “Back to Work.”
Hmmm, why does that sound familiar? A critic of Obama's, suggesting he adopt progressive ideas that he already believes in but have no chance in a Washington stymied by Republican intransigence and structural dysfunction. Ah yes: these guys. Maybe Clinton can join their cause?
5 comments
The term rogue comes to mind. But others will do, such as rakish or huckster, my favorite. TNR's recent long form about Tom Petters reminded me just how unprincipled he was as president, devoting hours giving out pardons to scoundrels; he must have felt a kinship.
- rayward
November 7, 2011 at 1:30pm
What I find interesting about Clinton's recommendations is that they're so simple. While Obama touts complex student loan, housing, infrastructure, and payroll tax schemes, Clinton picks ideas that can be immediately grasped by an uniformed voter. Get people to pay their taxes. Get government contractors to compete. Of course, the policies are directly populist, too. That's Clinton's genius. He always chooses the simplest policies and makes the other side not only look obstructionist, but plain stupid. Obama may have stopped getting involved in Congressional minutiae, but his policies are still in the thick of the policy weeds. That's why he even some Democrats don't like his ideas.
- polcereal
November 7, 2011 at 2:31pm
"Collecting one-quarter of the $345 billion in 'taxes that are owed but unpaid every year'" Does Clinton realize these people owe but can't pay? This is the problem with flatter rates. People with smaller incomes owe more than they can possibly pay, which means more government power and more government manpower is required to try to collect from them.
- Nusholtz
November 7, 2011 at 3:03pm
Well, this is all part of Our Bill's dark side: five alarm jack-assery, needing everyone's approval - even Newsmax (snicker). I love the man, but Bad Bill always reappears eventually.
- WandreyCer
November 7, 2011 at 3:56pm
What is needed is a new set of Progressive Dem leaders and candidates--- except maybe for Pelosi, that will come from no other Dem currently in leadership positions in the White House or Senate. 2012 is now hopeless, even if (or maybe especially if) BHO is re-elected because 2012-16 is a guaranteed economic disaster. Best that Repubs are in power in White House, House, and Senate. Live for 2016.
- drofnats1
November 7, 2011 at 6:49pm