THE STUMP JANUARY 6, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

It’s tempting to believe that anything that boosts Mitt Romney’s rivals is bad news for Romney himself. In fact, that’s not the case, and today’s Boston Globe endorsement of Jon Hunstman illustrates why.
According to the latest Suffolk University tracking poll, Romney has a 23-point lead in New Hampshire over Ron Paul, his closest competitor. Barring a near-miraculous turn of events, Romney will win next Tuesday’s primary contest. The real question, as I noted yesterday, is whether any of the non-Paul contenders can use New Hampshire to establish himself as a credible alternative. (Paul has a largely independent base of support and is running his own one-man race at this point.) With his virtual tie in Iowa, Santorum is the leading candidate to do so. In fact, the same Suffolk poll now shows him third in New Hampshire at 11 percent, up from a mere 3 percent on Monday.
But the only way Santorum can consolidate the anti-Romney vote is if he pulls away from the rest of the pack in the Granite State. Otherwise, the field will stay fractured heading into South Carolina, helping Romney secure a win that will effectively make him the nominee.
And therein lies the problem: According to the Suffolk poll, Huntsman and Newt Gingrich are currently bunched up right behind Santorum, each with 9 percent. Anything that helps Huntsman or Gingrich, like a high-profile endorsement, makes it more likely that these candidates finish near Santorum on Tuesday, thereby denying him the separation he desperately needs.
Granted, I doubt we’ve seen the end of Santorum’s post-Iowa bounce. I’d expect it to keep growing over the next few days. (In fact, Suffolk’s topline number clearly understates Santorum’s support, since the poll takes a two-day sample and the second night must have been higher than the first to bring up the overall number.) Moreover, the Globe is hardly required reading among New Hampshire Republicans, so we shouldn't overstate the impact of its endorsement.
Still, with so much riding on his success at breaking out of the non-Romney pack, Santorum can only afford to see the other candidates siphon off so much momentum before it kills his chances of becoming the clear Romney alternative. And if Santorum can’t become the alternative to Romney, it’s very unlikely that anyone else will, given how quickly these contests are coming up, and how damaged the other candidates are. All in all, Romney has to be satisfied with this development.
follow me on @noamscheiber
4 comments
Why can't support for Huntsman come from Romney supporters rather than the anti-Romney supporters; after all, Huntsman is much more like Romney than like Paul, Santorum, and Gingrich. I've given up on the Huntsman surge in New Hampshire (well, maybe a move but not a surge), but not on Huntsman as the (Republican establishment) alternative to Romney.
- rayward
January 6, 2012 at 1:37pm
From paragraph four, I think, "According to the Suffolk poll, Huntsman and New Gingrich are currently bunched up right behind Santorum..." There's a New Gingrich? Wasn't the old one bad enough? On topic: so far I have run up the flag pole a Romney-Huntsman ticket and a Romney-Santorum ticket. Given the remarks about polygamy and polyamory in another thread, why can't we just have a group GOP marriage ticket with all of them running at once? Run fast, run far, with Shakespeare's' most famous stage direction Exit, pursued by a bear.
- skahn
January 6, 2012 at 2:22pm
I also support the introduction of a wild bear to the primary elections.
- Konstantin
January 6, 2012 at 2:28pm
"Huntsman and Newt Gingrich are currently bunched up right behind Santorum." Well played.
- GeoffG
January 6, 2012 at 3:43pm