MARCH 28, 2008
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
It occurred to me while reading this Linda Douglass interview with McCain strategist Mark McKinnon how much McCain's fortunes are tied to momentum. I know this metaphor's pretty cliched, but his campaign really is like riding a bicycle: It's fine as long as it keeps moving along, but the second it stalls out, the whole thing could topple.
My thinking is that conservatives are generally going to keep their mouths shut as long as McCain has a decent shot at winning, because they know the GOP has no business even being in the game. But the second it looks like his chances are dimming, I suspect all the conservative skeptics are going to pipe up and basically finish him off.
For some reason, this was the McKinnon comment that got me thinking this way:
[I]n fact John McCain is making quite clear, as he did yesterday, on very specific issues where he does differ with the president. He respects the president and admires the president. But on fundamental issues that are very important like global warming, John McCain has a completely different position...
I know even the GOP is coming around on global warming. Still, a year ago it would have been very tough to imagine McCain as the nominee calling Bush out on global warming and not suffering serious conservative blowback as a result.
Another thing I thought was interesting from the interview: McKinnon has said he'd sit out the campaign if Obama wins the Democratic nomination. He stands by that promise and elaborates on it with Douglass, including this exchange:
Q: And it's because, what, you don't want to run negative ads against Obama?
McKinnon: Yeah.
Q: Or is there also a concern on your part that you don't want to run ads against Obama, the first African-American candidate to have this kind of a chance? Is that a factor as well?
McKinnon: I suppose that is in part, but it's more just that I like and admire the guy. I've come to a point in my life where I think character is important. I think he has great character. Again, I think he's really wrong on fundamental issues, but yeah, I just don't want to -- you know, I kind of want to put my guns down. It's just a matter of degrees, and like I said, I don't think I'm the best person to have in that slot for the campaign. So it would just be better for me to step to the sidelines.
In my piece this week, I talk about how attacks by one Democratic candidate against the other are especially damaging because they make the same attack much more credible when the GOP recycles it. But maybe it works the other way, too. Maybe being able to say that McCain's top media advisor quit rather than run negative ads against him would give Obama some immunity from the attacks McCain sends his way. You can imagine him saying, in the face of a hard-hitting ad, something like, "McCain's own media advisor quit rather than run an ad like this because he thought I had great character. So that shows you how misguided this is..."
--Noam Scheiber
6 comments
Maybe it means McKinnon's stepping aside so that tougher, stronger operatives whose hearts are still in the game can step up.
- teplukhin2you
March 28, 2008 at 4:47pm
Great analogy Noam.
I think you get it spot on. I happen to think McCain won't need stabilizers and is a serious opponent. The more hysterical the attacks from the usual wingnuts will actually help him compete with Obama for the centre.
He's got a chance.
Obama's given them some Hope recently.
- The Ignorant Populist
March 28, 2008 at 6:36pm
Political Jujistu. Has anyone noticed how Obama's rhetoric plays as perfect poltical jujitsu when dealing with attack politics? It allows Obama to pivot and reflect the attack back as "Politics as usual."
- bsdespain
March 28, 2008 at 7:55pm
It's the economy, stupid.
The numbers are soaring of people going on food stamps.
Phil Gramm, one of McCain's top economic advisors, was one of the key scoundrels behind the deregulation efforts that created this mess - the largest financial disaster since the Great Depression.
McCain has spent more time in Iraq than in Ohio. He should spend a bit more time in Ohio, where they've just seen the number of people applying for food stamps skyrocket.
- fougasseu
March 29, 2008 at 5:33am
I find it interesting that Clinton takes a lot of hits for her "Obama's not ready to be Commander-in-Chief" attacks on the grounds that those attacks open up that issue to easier exploitation by McCain, but Obama takes no hits on the same grounds for his attacks on the Clinton legacy (there are differences between the two attacks, of course). If there was any doubt that Obama's attacks have opened up the "Clinton continuation" for Republicans in a bigger way than it otherwise would have been, this McKinnon quote should erase it:
"Well, you know, I think that fundamentally she represents an extension of the Clinton legacy, which this country is just tired of. They are tired of the Clinton-style politics, and we've seen it manifest itself over the course of this campaign. And I have a lot of Democratic friends who like and respect Senator Clinton, but they don't want another extension of the Clinton administration for another four or eight years. And again, on some fundamental issues I think there's a great departure between her and Senator McCain, so that's where it sits."
After Obama's campaign against Clinton's political style, if she's the nominee, McCain will be able to say, "Even Democrats are tired of it. Barack said so and a ton of people voted for him."
- seth86
March 29, 2008 at 11:27pm
The piece in today's Times about McCain's tentative rapprochement with the House GOP reminded
- Anonymous
April 30, 2008 at 12:29pm