The New Republic

Unholy Alliance: [Andrew
Sullivan, The
Daily Dish]: “A reader reminds me of Rudy Giuliani's utter disgust at
the notion proffered by Ron Paul in a Republican debate that 9/11 may have had
some explanatory roots in the foreign policy of the US for the past fifty
years. So how does Giuliani stand and proudly accept the endorsement of a man
who said that Americans were actually responsible for 9/11 - because of their alleged
immorality? If you were appalled by Ron Paul's explicatory analysis, wouldn't
you be even more enraged by Robertson's causal analysis? Especially
since that would also apply to Giuliani himself? Does Rudy believe that he
helped cause 9/11? If he doesn't, why did he just accept the endorsement of a
man who does?”

Poor Prophesy: [Sarah
Posner, TAPPED]:
“Giuliani may feel like this is a big boost, but both George W. Bush and his father were advised to avoid appearances
with Robertson because of negative public opinion of him, even among
evangelicals. That was years ago, and Robertson has only lost influence since
then, yielding ground even to his own prot

share this article on facebook or twitter print this article