Compromise Without a Partner

The New Republic

You have read:

0 / 8

free articles in the past 30 days.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

sign up for unlimited access for just $34.97Sign me up

THE TREATMENT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

Compromise Without a Partner

Paul Starr, my old boss, wrote the book on the history of health care reform. Literally. He also believes in the virtues of bipartisan compromise. The problem, he writes, is that the Republicans don't:

As the debate over health reform enters its decisive stage, there is a lot of talk about the need for compromise between Democrats and Republicans. That was a sensible point to make in years past when Republicans offered alternatives for reform to compete with Democratic proposals. But this year there are two problems with the idea of bipartisan compromise. The first is that Republicans in Congress have not even made a pretense of offering constructive alternatives. The second is that the Democratic proposals are built around the ideas that Republicans used to favor -- those proposals already are bipartisan compromises. Unfortunately, they are compromises with a Republican Party that no longer exists.

The full essay, from the American Prospect, goes on to list all of the Republican ideas that Democrats have now adopted--and that Republicans now shun. It's worth reading in its entirety, as is Paul's Pulitzer-winning book, The Social Transformation American Medicine.

share this article on facebook or twitter

posted in: the treatment, health care, health, labor, social issues, congress, paul starr

print this article

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Back to Top

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK