THE VINE NOVEMBER 20, 2008
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Democrats aren't squandering any time getting the ball rolling on new energy legislation. Yesterday, Rahm Emanuel told a gathering of business leaders that an economic stimulus package heavy on "green infrastructure" would be Obama's first priority after he's sworn in:

Mr. Emanuel promised that a major economic stimulus would be "the first order of business" for Mr. Obama when he takes office Jan. 20. The focus of spending will be on infrastructure, specifically "green infrastructure," which he said would include mass transit, upgraded electricity transmission lines, "smart" electrical meters that allow consumers to save money by using electricity at off-peak hours, and universal broadband Internet access, which he said would encourage telecommuting.
Only one quibble: Does anyone believe that universal broadband access will actually encourage telecommuting? I would've guessed that those workers most ripe for telecommuting already have broadband access. All those measures are smart investments, though, and, for the most part, will pay for themselves over time. (We've hashed out the need for better transmissions lines ad nauseum by now.) Meanwhile, Barbara Boxer, who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee in the Senate, held a press conference on the Hill to announce that she would introduce two major climate bills at the start of the next congressional session:
The first bill will establish a grant program to reduce global warming emissions under the Clean Air Act with up to $15 billion a year available to spur innovations in clean energy, including advanced biofuels. This will be an economic stimulus and follows President-elect Obama’s recommendation. ...
The second piece of legislation will direct the Environmental Protection Agency to set up a cap and trade system for greenhouse gases that meets the goals laid out by the President elect. This bill will reflect the strong partnership we will have with the new Administration, and will focus on achieving the emissions reductions needed while restoring the economy. It will be a streamlined bill, which will amend the Clean Air Act.
It's hardly new that Boxer's going to follow Obama's lead, but it is eyebrow-raising to see this talk about drafting a "streamlined" cap-and-trade bill. That's essentially what Jeff Bingaman advised when I heard him discuss the Senate's energy priorities on Monday. Basically, the Lieberman-Warner cap-and-trade bill that Boxer tried—and failed—to shepherd through the Senate this summer was a monstrosity, with its complex allocation formulas and vast smorgasbord of handouts to placate a dizzying array of constituencies and interests. That's partly why the thing crashed and burned so spectacularly. Now, Boxer's office isn't revealing details just yet, but she promises that the new bill wil be "much simpler." Maybe it'll just refund all the revenue raised by auctioning off pollution permits back to consumers, or else kick decisions about how to spend the revenue down the road. We'll see.
Update: Huh, maybe I was too quick to be skeptical of broadband. Here's a recent econ paper by Moohoun Song, Peter Orazem, and Rajesh Singh offering evidence that better broadband access actually can increase the likelihood that workers will telecommute. I stand corrected.
--Bradford Plumer
5 comments
Well, as you say, universal broadband probably won't do much to encourage telecommuting, but it probably would do something to stimulate the economy. Moreover, people--specifically the rural voters who don't already have access to broadband--like the idea. So it makes sense from both economic and political standpoints to include broadband in the infrastructure package. The telecommuting line is just a way to justify including broadband in the same paragraph on "green" infrastructure as transmission lines and commuter rail. I'm willing to forgive Rahm that.
- aeromonas
November 20, 2008 at 2:38pm
I think that's fair. Although I also may be totally wrong about the green potential: Here's one paper suggesting that increasing broadband access actually *can* boost telecommuting:
ideas.repec.org/.../12495.html
I'll add an update to the original post.
- Brad Plumer
November 20, 2008 at 2:46pm
Not directly related but for what it's worth.
I telecommute and I work in the industry.
Most companies have a problem with providing LAN access from home. In short - they fear people will work less.
Two things have changed this attitude.
First of all structural problems with offices. Namely commuting and it's associated problems. I'm not just talking about traffic: we moved to a state-of-the-art new building in the heart of the city but the council only allowed us build a limited number of car parking spaces, despite unlimited underground parking potential. (They have to justify the spend on the LUAS and Bus Lanes somehow.)
As you can imagine changes like this are focusing minds.
Secondly, technology. Unified Communications and CRM packages practically ensure, if not improve, workers work rate and are giving senior mgt confidence in remote working.
Also, if governments privatise national digital networks, then they can't expect private companies to roll out broadband to remote areas where there is no margin. They will have to subsidize this or admit their ideological mistakes and nationalize the telco industry. (If only.)
As for the green effect? (Is it effect or affect, I'm never sure.)
I moved to a new residential estate recently and it took a long, long while to get remote access installed. During that period I was doing the traditional commute. I did my car log for the year last week (unspeakable admin torture), the first annual log with the benefit of remote access and I reckon my mileage was a third, a quarter, probably even lower than the previous year.
That's a lot of carbon credits build up.
Come on Brad, surely that saved carbon deserves a TNR mug, or at least a Vine mug?
- The Ignorant Populist
November 20, 2008 at 8:33pm
It's going to be tough getting any bill that reduces U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions through Congress
- Anonymous
November 21, 2008 at 2:13pm
The missus telecommutes to her job in FL, despite the fact that we now live in KS. Broadband access is provided, paid for by her employer. Broadband access didn't necessarily encourage the telecommute in this case (the fact that I got a better job did) but it certainly facilitated it, and that has to count for something in the scheme of things, doesn't it?
- cspencef
November 21, 2008 at 3:20pm