Cleaner Than Your Current Water

The New Republic

You have read:

0 / 8

free articles in the past 30 days.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

sign up for unlimited access for just $34.97Sign me up

THE VINE AUGUST 12, 2008

Cleaner Than Your Current Water

I've been remiss in not linking to Elizabeth Royte's New York Times Magazine article from this past weekend, about her visit to Orange County's sewage treatment plant, by volume the largest indirect potable reuse ("toilet-to-tap") program in the world. Royte makes a very important, and often overlooked, point: It's not like ordinary freshwater is all that fresh.

To understand the basics of contemporary water
infrastructure is to acknowledge that most American tap water has had
some contact with treated sewage. Our wastewater-treatment plants
discharge into streams that feed rivers from which other cities suck
water for drinking. By the time New Orleans residents drink the
Mississippi, the water has been in and out of more than a dozen cities;
more than 200 communities, including Las Vegas, discharge treated
wastewater into the Colorado River. ...

It’s one of the many pardoxes of indirect potable reuse that
the water leaving the plant in Fountain Valley is far cleaner than the
water that it mingles with. Yes, the water entering the
sewage-treatment plant in Fountain Valley is 100 percent wastewater and
has a T.D.S.--a measure of water purity, T.D.S. stands for total
dissolved solids and refers to the amount of trace elements in the
water--of 1,000 parts per million. But after microfiltration and
reverse osmosis, the T.D.S. is down to 30. (Poland Spring water has a
T.D.S. of between 35 and 46.) By contrast, the “raw” water in the
Anaheim basins has a T.D.S. of 600.

There is some reputable opposition to indirect potable reuse--in particular, even if the process usually works fine, there's always the risk that human error or mechanical failure might result in occasional snafus, which could threaten public health. But most of the opposition, in cities like my own hometown of San Diego, results simply from the "yuck" factor. For some reason, reusing other cities' wastewater doesn't strike most people as nearly as objectionable as reusing your own wastewater. And the best solution to that is the market. If water from other sources becomes increasingly scarce and citizens are informed that their water bills would be, say, 40 percent higher in the absence of indirect potable reuse, my guess is the "yuck" factor wouldn't seem quite as compelling. (They may not like toilet-to-tap in Orange County, but what they really don't like is higher bills from governmental agencies.) In the meantime, though, we're likely to mostly just see more use of treated wastewater in industry, to water golf courses, and so on.

--Josh Patashnik

share this article on facebook or twitter

posted in: the vine

print this article

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 3 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Back to Top

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK