SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Morning Reading Assignment

TIMOTHY NOAH SEPTEMBER 16, 2011

Morning Reading Assignment

I've been wondering when I'd get a chance to read about how Bill Daley is screwing up as President Obama's chief of staff. Apparently, so has Daley. "A few months ago, [Daley] ... predicted that the first wave of negative stories about him would start popping sometime after the 'shitty' summer, according to an administration official." That's from a new Politico story by Glenn Thrush, John Bresnahan, and Amie Parnes. It's not a great story, but Politico doesn't really do great stories. It does so-so, hastily-reported versions of stories that everybody wants to read. (Not a terrible publishing strategy, given the pressures of the Web.) You have to read Politico's story because the great story has yet to be written. Maybe it's somewhere in Ron Suskind's new book.

The rap against Daley is that he's too isolated. His "brisk, officious closed-door corporate style" Politico says, "has soured some White House staffers who think he's pinching Obama's access to his own people, depriving him of a wider variety of opinions." That's interesting, because we've heard similar criticism of Obama's national security adviser, Tom Donilon, and especially of his deputy national security adviser, Denis McDonough. So maybe the faulty management style is Obama's, not Daley's. At any rate, it's worrying.

The main problem with the Politico piece is that its central example is Daley's mishandling of the scheduling of Obama's jobs bill speech. Obama wanted to give it in the House of Representatives on a Wednesday and Boehner said no dice, you have to give it on a Thursday. This somehow became a two-day story and a referendum on Obama's impotence and the House Republicans' incivility. I don't care about how Daley handled this trivial scheduling conflict. I care about how Daley advised Obama during the disastrously drawn-out debt-ceiling negotiations, in which Obama really did look impotent and the House Republicans looked not merely uncivil but bent on destroying the economy. But Politico has nothing on that except a passing reference to Daley cutting Senate leaders out of the loop during the negotiations.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid apparently called Obama to complain that Daley keeps him in the dark. That's interesting.

Anyway, you should read this piece because it's all we've got and Daley's management of the White House has until now been a weirdly unreported story.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 8 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

8 comments

I don't at all care for Bill Daley, but we could use some good reporting on him, as you write Timothy.

- liberalref

September 16, 2011 at 12:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

See, when Obama proposes something, Republican's scream that he didn't ask them. Then, when he agrees to move the date of his presentation, they criticize that he's "impotent". Does he get credit for his willingness to compromise? No, he does not. But thanks for the update on Bill Daley -- keep up the good work.

- AllanL5

September 16, 2011 at 12:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As you mention, Timothy, it's interesting to speculate the degree to which Daley is at fault and the degree to which Obama is at fault. Thanks, by the way, for linking us to the printable version - this loads much faster and is much easier on my network's stringent bandwidth restrictions.

- whyamihere

September 16, 2011 at 1:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Morning reading? Man, journalists wake up late.

- josh_y

September 16, 2011 at 1:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I must be a contrarian, but I thought the Wednesday vs. Thursday bit was done so nobody would accuse Obama of using football to increase exposure to the speech, knowing that Boehner would object to Wednesday. The alternative, which seems to be the conventional (Politico) wisdom, is that either Daley or Obama is an idiot.

- rayward

September 16, 2011 at 1:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

When you say "Reid," I assume you mean Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader. I have to assume that because you didn't say who "Reid" was. Sloppy journalism?

- brucebaxte

September 16, 2011 at 4:58pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I wouldn't call it sloppy journalism. I'd call it sloppy writing. Thanks for flagging, though. It's fixed now.

- Timothy Noah

September 17, 2011 at 12:11am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Tim, From your other post yesterday, this: "hiring old Washington hands is pretty much what old Washington hands always advise," caused me to burst out laughing. Spot on & funny. And from this post, "It's not a great story, but Politico doesn't really do great stories. It does so-so, hastily-reported versions of stories that everybody wants to read," also keen-eyed. Politico is like the sports pages. You can miss a couple of days or even weeks and pick up where you left off without being aware much happened in between. Anyway, welcome to TNR. Dan

- dbuck1

September 17, 2011 at 11:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close