WORLD CUP JUNE 13, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Well, I said 1-1 before it started. (Not publicly or anything, so you'll just have to be believe me.) And although that prediction was partly a defense mechanism, I never shared the conviction of most of my fellow England fans camped out at Foakeng's Lucky Bar yesterday afternoon -- or of the jingoistic papers from which they seemed to take their cue -- that this would be easy.
Those England fans, by the way, seem to have mellowed a bit. I may be wrong about this, but I have the feelling that if, hours before the kickoff of England's first World Cup game in say, 1986, you'd worn a Germany soccer jersey while walking into a bar packed with England fans a mile from the stadium -- many of them drinking all day -- you'd have gotten a nasty word or two at the very least. But all my German friend got with his Schweinsteiger shirt was a couple people wanting to talk about their experience in Berlin in 06. With the Argentina game playing on TV, there was one guy who tried to get a "The Falklands Are Ours" chant going, but he was younger and middle-class, and seemed to be looking for approval, and it quickly died. This seems basically generational, at least with the German thing. In the 80s, if you were an England fan over say 60, you'd more than likely fought in the war, and if you were younger your Dad might have. Today that's ancient history. Having said all this, the four England fans in front of us at the game almost got thrown out after starting little half-fights with several different groups of (frankly pretty annoying and lippy) Americans. So maybe not much has changed -- there's just less historical consciousness in today's football hooligans.
This is another story, but I had a weird and slightly traumatic moment during the playing of God Save the Queen, when the American guy behind me irritatingly started singing that "Sweet Land of Liberty" song which has the same tune as God Save the Queen, and in my combination of nervousness and mild drunkenness I got confused and thought they were playing the American national anthem. So I sort of sat it out, and then realized at the end that I'd gotten it wrong and missed the chance for the big expression of unity and momentum that the end of the national anthem gives you. "At least give us our national anthem," I said to the American. "Oh, you can have it," he replied, smiling Americanly.
I've tried to put off talking about the game itself because when a big game gets decided on a thing like happened last night, a dignified silence sort of feels like the only possible response. But that doesn't work on the internets, so here goes.
I've never quite been convinced by the legend of Capello as some kind of tactical genius (or frankly, I guess, by the legend of any football coach as a tactical genius) and yesterday he seemed to get every big decision wrong. Green instead of James, enough said. But Milner instead of Joe Cole on the left -- apparently with the idea of offering Ashley Cole more help in containing Donovan -- also didn't work out, as was made clear when Milner, who had struggled with fitness all week, was pulled off after half an hour having failed to get anywhere close to the game. The Ledley King experiment also was a bust, with the injury-prone center-back having to come off at half-time. That his replacement, Jamie Carragher, lacks the speed to be reliable at this level was quickly exposed by Jozy Altidore, during a terrifying, muscular run that almost gave the U.S. an unlikely victory.
As so often, the Lampard-Gerrard tandem often struggled to really influence the game. Neither seemed eager to take anyone on, although Gerrard tackled well, and had a nicely-taken goal. Aaron Lennon looked like by far our most dangerous player, getting to the byline against Bocanegra almost at will, although his final ball wasn't always the best.
I've seen some criticism of Rooney's performance, but I thought he did as well as could be expected. Michael Bradley -- America's best player, I thought -- seemed to have been directed not to let him out of his sight, but Rooney still had a few of his usual nicely placed flicks and layoffs. It makes things a lot harder when your striking partner isn't himself a threat to score -- as Heskey demonstrated by shooting straight at Howard when played clear through early in the second half.
Also, aside from about ten minutes in the second half, the scoreboard didn't work, which was more annoying than I expected. I found I could never quite erase from my mind the nagging fear -- or hope -- that one of the goals hadn't really counted, or that I'd missed one or something.
Looks like David James is odds on to start against Algeria. Hard to argue with that.
6 comments
Hard to argue that neither coach's tactical gambles really worked. Beyond the aforementioned Capello screwups (Milner, King, Green), Bob Bradley's going with Findley to partner with Altidore never really worked and the 2nd half subs were ill used. He waited far too late to take of Findley (especially as his challenge, like Carragher's, could have easily been a straight red with a less forgiving ref). Bringing Buddle on for Findley when the US was struggling for possession instead of a more holding or possession based mid like Torres or Feilhaber was a wasted sub. He couldn't get the ball enough to make an impact. Holden came on for Altidore, then was no help in keeping the ball either. M. Bradley was very good in Central Mid, in part it made me rue last year's Confed. Cup final: If it wasn't for Jorge Bleeping Larrionada's anti-US vendetta, the US would have beaten Brazil with him in there. The good news, if you're a US fan, is that he's only 22: He's got two more World Cups in him!
- Crock1701
June 13, 2010 at 10:54am
The real mistake by Capello was not that he picked Green over James, it was that he did this only two hours before the first match. Green is not a particularly bad goalkeeper, as he has shown in the Premier League, he merely lacked the confidence necessary to give a good performance. Capello should have picked his goalie two weeks ago -as other coaches have done as well - and have invested in his confidence. I am sure that Green would not have made that unfortunate mistake if he would have been given more support from his coach.
- yzon
June 13, 2010 at 12:41pm
Tend to agree with you on the Green problem. Never saw the tactical advantage of holding off naming your starter in goal until right up to the match. There's no real difference I would assume in preparation between the Goalies, it's not going to change your formation or anything like that. All it does was leave confidence in any of them up in the air. And there doesn't seem a huge difference in quality between them; Certainly Howard would start over any of them.
- Crock1701
June 13, 2010 at 1:32pm
"Certainly Howard would start over any of them." Absolutley, in fact all three American goalkeepers would start over any of the English 'keepers. Which bega the question, how is it that the USA consistently produces world class goalkeepers in abundance? Is this due to the fact that the most popular American sports involve using your hands, hence players tend to be more experience against better competition?
- wkwami
June 13, 2010 at 2:48pm
That's a good question, wkwami. What becomes very clear though is that the English should stop importing foreign goalkeepers to their Premiership teams and start developing own talent.
- yzon
June 13, 2010 at 3:36pm
Crock1701 (for example) writes: -- Tend to agree with you on the Green problem. Never saw the tactical advantage of holding off naming your starter in goal until right up to the match. If memory serves there was a time when England alternated keeper from game to game between two picks. As regards Green, I doubt anyone would be complaining about him had he not made that unfortunate error. Zachary Roth writes about the English fan of 1986: -- This seems basically generational, at least with the German thing. In the 80s, if you were an England fan over say 60, you'd more than likely fought in the war, and if you were younger your Dad might have. Today that's ancient history. I have no doubt that the overwhelming memory for a 1986 English soccer fan viz -a-viz Germany was the 1966 final which still stands as the pinnacle of English soccer achievement - with the additional significance of being against the arch enemy Germany.
- ndmackenzie
June 13, 2010 at 5:32pm