BOOKS NOVEMBER 9, 2012
by Adrienne Rich
W.W. Norton, 544 pages, $39.95
THIS ESSENTIAL, CAREFULLY organized book tracks Adrienne Rich’s work from 1971 to 2012, the year of her death. The selections were chosen by Rich herself. The journey from the opening poems to the ghostly and unpublished testaments of her final years is therefore authoritatively mapped.
It has been a remarkable journey. Adrienne Rich began writing in a strange, charged poetic moment. Her first book, A Change of World, was published in 1951. She was twenty-two years old. In that era of American empire and postwar anxiety, there was still an exclusivity, a prescribed decorum, about the poet’s identity. A poet who was daring or dissident—and Rich would prove to be both—might well end up like the brother in the Icelandic fable, who confronts another brother and demands his share of the kingdom. Here is your share, says the older sibling: here is six feet of the kingdom.
The American poem was not in a grave at that time; not by any measure. There was achievement, experiment, excitement. But there was also confinement. It could be felt in the air, in an ethos of conditional acceptance. A young woman poet was not yet a familiar sight. When Auden remarked about Rich’s poems, after choosing her as a Yale Younger Poet, that they were “neatly and modestly dressed,” it sounded more like a counsel for the nursery than acclaim for a new writer.
This book, as the title suggests, moves forward from the mid-point of Rich’s career. There are thirteen sections here, with generous inclusions from signature work such as “Dark Fields of the Republic” and “An Atlas of the Difficult World.” There is also a luminous final section, just ten poems long, titled “New and Unpublished Poems 2010–2012.” The very last poem is called “Endpapers” and finishes with a final, elliptical gesture toward striving:
The signature to a life requires
The search for a method
Reading through this book, some things immediately strike home. Most of all the remarkable consistency of craft—an underappreciated element of Rich’s work. For so many years Rich has been typecast as a poet of statement, anger, witness. And all of those modes have their place. But the meticulous artistry of poems such as “Diving into the Wreck” or “Power” deserves a closer look.
In poems such as these, the marvelous weaving in and out—of relations between line and line, between music and voice, between image and insistence—is intense and exemplary. The artful deployment of broken space on the page, the fractured syntax, and the absent punctuation signal stylistic decision at the highest level. Not just the poem, but also the history of Rich’s poetic independence, unfolds as we read. In a lyric age, Rich refused a lyric project. In a narrative era, she shunned story-telling. Her strategy was to take a voice-driven line and stampede it toward stanzaic drama, as in “Diving into the Wreck”:
The words are purposes.
The words are maps.
I came to see the damage that was done
and the treasures that prevail.
The most powerful poems here—and they are scattered right through the book—establish a psychic horizon in which the tone manages to be both conversational and oracular; in which the reader can feel solitary and communal at the same time. There may have been, for the apprentice Rich, a shadow of Lowell in this practice; there may also have been a light from Yeats. But the deliberate structure of a Rich poem, gliding between private awareness and public oratory, often in the space of a few lines, is entirely hers.
The volume “A Wild Patience Has Taken Me This Far,” shows an example of this in a poem called “For Memory.” It seems to open with a simple, intimate address that beckons the ordinary world (and did you ever tell me/ how your mother called you in from play). And then, not without warning, but also without any forced transition, the poem opens out into a powerful revelation:
Freedom. It isn’t once, to walk out
under the Milky Way, feeling the rivers
of light, the fields of dark—
freedom is daily, prose-bound, routine
remembering. Putting together, inch by inch
the starry worlds. From all the lost collections.
The mid-career and later years of Adrienne Rich’s work were a time of achievement and controversy. The poems here are the text; the context is of a poet who was often at odds with the contemporary aesthetic—who challenged the insularity of art and found the chosen isolation of the artist unacceptable. When she refused to accept the National Medal for the Arts in 1997, she laid out her view in a letter: “I believe in art’s social presence—as breaker of official silences, as voice for those whose voices are disregarded, and as a human birthright.” In “North American Time,” she confirms her central belief: that the ethical imagination is a responsibility and not an option:
Try sitting at a typewriter
one calm summer evening
at a table by a window
in the country, try pretending
your time does not exist
that you are simply you
that the imagination simply strays
like a great moth, unintentional
try telling yourself
you are not accountable
to the life of your tribe
the breath of your planet
This has never been a comfortable or fashionable view. And what is the reader to make of it now, looking through these later poems? How to interpret this stance which, while often admired, has just as often been called polemical or ideological or just plain didactic? Those are not always terms of praise in the current view of poetry. But now more than ever, seeing the reach and the constancy of this work, those terms themselves seem out of touch, or at the very least inaccurate.
So is there another way to describe Rich’s chosen stance, one that places it clearly within the continuum of American poetry, of world poetry—although, granted, these are not locations she sought out—and defines her achievement according to her intentions, rather than despite them? That clarifies her luminous influence on the history of the poem? I think there is. To do so, a backward glance is necessary.
Rich began to write when poetry itself was shifting its definitions: modernism had prevailed, but at a cost. The poet was a decisive figure, but in a shrinking world. In a later stage of modernism, the popular reader was disdained. The contemporary poet was warned away—like a child, told not to talk to strangers—from the exuberant past where a couplet caught fire or a quatrain was repeated in a room at twilight. Or a poem was recited late at night, all its refrains known to everyone in the room.
Above all, the public poem—that glowing centuries-old instrument of passion and protest—was relegated to the shadows. Not, to be clear, the political poem: it continued to be written with gusto even after modernism. What languished was the public poem, and especially the old fusion of the public poem and political poem. What Rich drew out of the shadows, and put into practice, was that deeply democratic, beautifully mixed alloy practiced by Whitman, and loved by the early Yeats, but frowned on by a later anti-populist mood. In her time, quite simply, she re-united the public poem with the political one. It is an enormous achievement.
In the light of such a view, this book presents the thrilling spectacle of a poet seeking the alloy once again; seeking to restore an acoustic to the contemporary poem. Seeking out and drawing in the moral power of imagination, together with its private aspect. In “Dark Fields of the Republic,” the poem “In Those Years” makes her ambition plain. It makes it clear that the communal should and must be recovered:
In those years, people will say we lost track
of the meaning, of we and you
we found ourselves
reduced to I
All this is not to say that the later poems do not turn inward. They do; and that turn is another pleasure of this book. But it is not a purist solitude. In the poem “Song” she defines it with a striking image:
If I’m lonely
it’s with the rowboat ice-fast on the shore
in the last red light of the year
that knows what it is, that knows it’s neither
ice nor mud nor winter light
but wood, with a gift for burning
I cannot believe any serious reader of contemporary poetry would want to be without this book. W.W. Norton—and Rich’s devoted editor Jill Bialosky, herself a poet—has brought out a text that is perfectly set up for the new reader as well as the old; for the classroom as well as the critic. And perhaps most of all, for that midnight reader in all of us who simply wants to hear an essential voice again. Above all, this volume provides the witness of a great and unswerving poet who found an art and practiced it and left it more open, more generous, and more available than she found it.
Eavan Boland is the director of the creative writing program at Stanford and the author of A Journey with Two Maps: Becoming a Woman Poet.