SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Muslim Brothers Make The Obama Cut

THE PLANK JUNE 2, 2009

Muslim Brothers Make The Obama Cut

CAIRO--Good news for political reformers and Islamists: In an unexpected bit of diplomatic choreography, several members of the Muslim Brotherhood have been invited to attend Barack Obama's speech in Cairo tomorrow. This is a small triumph for the many people upset that Obama's visit would simply affirm Hosni Mubarak's near-monopoly on political discourse here, and if reports are true that the invitation came after a push for Washington, suggests that Obama isn't putting on a show perfectly tailored to Mubarak's liking. 

To the typical American, the Muslim Brothers may sound more sinister than they are: Dedicated to an Islamist society in Egypt, they are a badly weakened political party which--although linked to terrorism in past decades--now operates nonviolently in the Egyptian parliament, in what precious little breathing room Mubarak's security state allows.

How tame are the Brothers? Enough that your relatively green foreign correspondent visited with one of their senior leaders today. After slogging through Cairo's bizarrely gnarled traffic to a quiet riverside neighborhood, I ascended two flights of marble steps to find a modestly ornate wooden door bearing a small blue-and-white sign that read "Muslim Brotherhood." Inside was a dreary, flourescent lit office space where televisions were tuned to al Jazeera. I was ushered in to the internal office of Mohamed Habib, deputy chairman of the Brotherhood in Egypt. Habib was a pleasant if unremarkable fellow, resembling not a stereotypical Islamist but an intellectual-- an academic, maybe, or an editor--in eyeglasses and a white collared shirt. On his desk lay an Arabic newspaper featuring a photo of Obama on its front page. Beside it were prayer beads, a silver candy dish, and a pair of cell phones.

Habib explained his skepticism about Obama's speech here on Thursday. "If there is no radical change in American policies, I don't think it matters what he says," Habib told me through a translator. "I pity Obama because I know he is not on his own. He is surrounded by different forces--business congolmerates and the Zionist lobby." Nor did Habib care much for the prevailing debate in the US about how much emphasis to place on democracy promotion. "Understand that democracy in the Bush administration was not a goal itself but a curtain to hide the atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan." When it comes to Egypt's internal affairs, all the Muslim Brothers ask, Habib said, was that the US end its support for Hosni Mubarak's regime. "We don't want anything from the U.S. but to back off from supporting existing dictatorships. That's it," he said.

Oddly, it is not Islamists like Habib who are most upset with Obama right now. It is sectarian reformers like Ayman Nour, a 2005 presidential candidate who was imprisoned in 2006 and unexpectedly released earlier this year. I also met today with Nour, who told me that he, too, had been invited to Obama's speech--although he says he won't go and doesn't expect to applaud it. Tomorrow, I'll write more about Nour, perhaps the one Egyptian opposition figure Obama can get behind.    

Photo: The Muslim Brotherhood offices in Cairo's Manial neighborhood

--Michael Crowley

Obamania in Cairo, by Michael Crowley (6/1/09)  

Report: Obama to Speak at Cairo University, by Michael Crowley (5/26/09)

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 8 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

8 comments

"We don't want anything from the U.S. but to back off from supporting existing dictatorships. That's it."

Fair enough, but it'd be a whole lot easier for us to withdraw support from dictatorships if it didn't look like the immediate successor regimes would adhere to some form of apocalyptic Wahhabi-style Islamism.  It's hard to overstate the awfulness of the Haus of Saud, but even a gross and corrupt theocratic monarchy is preferable to an Arabia governed by some sort of Taliban-style jihadist junta (the first act of which might be to begin working on a nuclear arsenal).

- Androscoggin

June 2, 2009 at 5:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

CAIRO-- The enthusiasm for Obama in this city, at least in the touristy areas through which I strolled

- Anonymous

June 2, 2009 at 5:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm beginning to wonder whether there is any bottom line to Obama's  toleration of radical Islamism:

www.matthiaskuentzel.de/.../hitlers-legacy-islamic-antisemitism-and-the-impact-of-the-muslim-brotherhood

- noga1

June 2, 2009 at 8:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Music In The Meltdown: What Should Pop Sound Like When The Country's Going To Hell? by David Hadju

- Anonymous

June 3, 2009 at 7:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

CAIRO-- It's a taboo subject in Egypt, one that can get you arrested simply for mentioning. But speculation

- Anonymous

June 3, 2009 at 10:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

nogal, I understand your concern. However, the article you refer to doesn't quite get the issues right with respect to the Muslim Brotherhood. For one thing, describing in it's first sentence the MB as "the ancestor of all forms of Islamism" is plain wrong. There is a centuries-long tradition of conservative religious revival in Islam and the MB is not remotely the beginning of it. If any one group could be described as a progenitor of the Islamism referred to by Küntzel, one would have to point to the 18th century Wahhabi movement of Arabia or the Sudanese Mahdi movement in the same century.

Nor are references to Britain's Islamic radicals very helpful. Britain has deep problems with it's Muslim immigrant communities that are specific to it. Although often wrapped in the comforting language of religion, the anger felt by these communities is more often rooted in political and economic estrangement. That doesn't make such anger any less dangerous, but the MB is not the problem.

Furthermore, as indicated in Crowley's TNR article, the modern day MB is very different from Hassan al-Banna's when it was founded in 1928. Government crackdowns, public opinion, factional infighting, and the exigencies of operating a political party have all significantly moderated its message. Insofar as moderate parties are possible in absolutist regimes such as Egypt, the MB seems on its way to becoming one and for that reason I support the President's inclusion of them. Frankly, there are no other real options there.

- bacchant

June 3, 2009 at 2:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

CAIRO-- "I have traces of torture everywhere on my body," says Ayman Nour. Late on a smoldering

- Anonymous

June 3, 2009 at 5:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

CAIRO-- When it comes to pushing democracy in Mubarak's Egypt, Obama tells NPR : In every country

- Anonymous

June 4, 2009 at 9:47am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close