Edward Jay Epstein has become the de facto historian of the Madoff scandal. Every time he and I speak, he has found another key to the master Ponzi schemer's evil genius. There was a time when the Securities and Exchange Commission trusted Madoff absolutely. So he was able to clear two other stock markets by saying that the documents they used in their defense were kosher.
Is modern finance more like electricity or junk food? This is, of course, the big question of the day. If most of finance as currently organized is a form of electricity, then we obviously cannot run our globalized economy without it. We may worry about adverse consequences and potential network disruptions from operating this technology, but this is the cost of living in the modern world. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that the vast majority of what happens in and around modern financial markets is much more like junk food--little nutritional value, bad for your health, and a h
I consider David Brooks one of the two-to-three best columnists in the business, and he's obviously warmly disposed toward Obama, so I doubt he intends to be uncharitable in today's column. But I think that's where he ends up nonetheless. Particularly this: "By force of circumstances and by design, the president has promoted one policy after another that increases spending and centralizes power in Washington." Do Obama's policies--both enacted and proposed--centralize power in Washington? Of course.
Martin Feldstein -- Harvard economist, McCain advisor, and member of Obama's Recovery Advisory Board -- wants more resources devoted to defense spending: The focus on domestic economic policies in the 1930s and the desire to remain militarily neutral delayed the major military buildup that eventually achieved the economic recovery. The administration’s current budget point to a one‐fifth reduction in the share of GDP devoted to defense over the next decade.
After the stress test results came out a few months back, I did a piece about how, while the government's scrubbing of bank balance sheets was certainly welcome, there were still a lot of things the banks weren't fessing up to. One of those things was loss reserves--that is, the amount of capital banks set aside to absorb losses on loans that turn bad. Here's a brief explanation: The real problem is that the banks won't fully acknowledge their losses. One of the more elusive concepts in all of accounting is an exercise known as reserving.
NYT talks up TARP profits and WSJ warns of big FDIC losses. The pain of being a middle-aged former finacial-sector employee. How cities can prevent empty-storefront-ification. Men's underwear sales foretell a gradual rebound in spending. Did Hoover's generosity to workers cause the Depression? Justin Wolfers will have plenty of bedtime chatter tonight.
With the President Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package (aka, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act or ARRA) six months old now, it's fair to ask like everybody else is: How’s it working? One way to decide is to simply count the jobs created and jobs preserved. And on that front the commentariat has been quick to pronounce.
The notion of a two-track economy seems to be taking hold. We kicked the concept around pretty well last week--your 130 comments (as of this morning) helped clarify a great deal of what we know, don’t know, and need to worry about. The two-track concept overlaps with, and builds on, long-standing issues of inequality in the U.S., but it’s also different. Within existing income classes, some people find themselves in relatively good shape and others are completely hammered. New dimensions of differentiation are also taking hold within occupations and within industries--the WSJ this morning has
A new paper by Ken Medlock and Amy Myers Jaffe of Rice University on oil speculation attracted a lot of unquestioning attention late this week. In the study, Medlock and Jaffe accuse the CFTC of missing the way rampant speculation may have driven up oil prices earlier this decade. But after reading the paper, it’s pretty clear that Medlock and Jaffe don’t have anything resembling a smoking gun. They largely rely on one correlation to support their case: That volume in oil futures contracts increased sharply at the same time that oil prices did.