January 28, 2008
John McCain's recent comments on Supreme Court appointments seemed worth a blockquote: McCain mentioned that Sam Brownback would play an advisory role in helping decide who he should nominate for the Supreme Court. As models of who he would select, John McCain pointed to Justices Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia. The idea that McCain would let Sam Brownback do the honors of picking John Paul Stevens's replacement is terrifying, but not unexpected.
The Clintons And The Race Card
No one can deny that the Clintons play the race card. But it wasn't until the South Carolina primary that many people realized that they play it both ways. I have to admit that I myself only dimly recalled the smarmy stuff that Christopher Hitchens documented in Slate today. I also have to admit that I am loathe to be indebted to Hitchens for anything. But it can't be helped. He has the cynicism and self-righteousness of the couple down cold. Refresh your memory, think about the ugly analogy to Jesse Jackson, and shudder...Do we really want these two in the White House?
What Would Janet Reno Do?
Lest you think Obama's getting all the big endorsements today, it should be noted for the record that Janet Reno is backing Hillary. This is actually moderately surprising, given Reno's conflicted relationship with the Clintons--especially Hillary.
January 27, 2008
Overturning The Clintons
The Clintons are in a rage, and a couple enraged against the world is usually taking cover from the rage they feel towards each other.But, since this is a couple which doesn't even have the comfort of pillow talk, its internal aggressions are projected outwards to the people they have defined as enemies.Still, imagine Hillary having to come to terms with the fact that her husband -- the one adored by the official liberals -- has now angered them by his racialist petulance towards their upstart opponents and by the sebaceous indulgence of his own righteous self.
Pelosi Was Right
Carl Hulse has a nice piece in today's New York Times on the reaction among Democrats to Nancy Pelosi's decision to cut a deal with House Republicans on a stimulus package. The basic question is whether Pelosi gave away too much in agreeing to leave food stamps and extended unemployment benefits out of the bill, as Republicans demanded in exchange for including tax rebates to people who make too little to pay income tax. Charlie Rangel, for one, wasn't sold on the bargain: The final agreement showed that Ms.
Russia Embraces Possible Murderer!
The Los Angeles Times has a great piece today on Andrei Lugovoy, the main suspect in the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. Britain wants to extradite Lugovoy, but now he has become a hero and member of parliament(!) in Russia.
January 26, 2008
The Take-away From South Carolina
What you need to know about tonight's results: 1.) Obama took nearly 80 percent of the black vote, yes, but also about a quarter of the white vote. That stacks up pretty well alongside Hillary's 36 percent and Edwards's 40***--well enough that Nora O'Donnell of MSNBC could call it "almost a three-way split," and The New York Times could proclaim that a "coalition of white and black support" powered Obama's victory. This is a huge development going forward.
I'll leave the sophisticated electoral analysis to my more sophisticated colleagues, Noam and Mike. But I have to say something about Obama's speech, which is the best I've seen him give in a while, if not the entire campaign. That's a high standard, I know, but I think it's true. Tonight's address was every bit as lyrical as the speech Obama gave in Iowa. And it touched on many of the same themes, about healing division and building a movement of voters seeking change. But those themes weren't as front-and-center as they were earlier in the month.
Best election night speech of his I've heard yet. Some key passages: We are up against the conventional thinking that says your ability to lead as President comes from longevity in Washington or proximity to the White House.
Obama's Primary Mistakes
A while back I chastised the Democratic National Committee for disenfranchising the voters of Florida and Michigan because the state parties had decided to hold their primaries earlier than the Washington leadership had ordained. I know my neighbor (just down the street) and friend James Roosevelt is co-chairman of the Rules and By-laws Committee of the D.N.C. So he must at least be partially responsible. But who knows? This is goofy enough to be the doing of Dr.