Well, the June 28 issue of The New York Review of Books has just arrived, and it is not in this issue, either. This is something of a scandal. The "it" to which I refer is a long letter to the editor by Shlomo Avineri. The letter is a devastating rejoinder to an article by George Soros that appeared in the April, 12 issue of the New York Review. The title of Soros's article was "On Israel, America and AIPAC," and it was written partly in response to an article that I had published in TNR on February 12, about Soros and the Jews.
Like healthcare, the cost of college tuition in America has been spiraling out of control in the past decade. And the current college loan scandal only makes that more evident. (My alma mater, Columbia -- which just happens to be at the center of said scandal -- costs around $45,000 for tuition and board; that's about $10,000 more than when I matriculated in 2000). It's terrible, first of all, to prey on financially uninformed young people. But even at good rates, the prospect of taking out tens, even hundreds of thousands in loans, particularly for undergraduate education, is terrifying.
A few days ago, The Swords of Truth, a Gaza organization of Muslim holy men that had burned down Internet cafes and Christian book shops, threatened to slash the necks of female broadcasters. Behead them, that means. This is now something of an epidemic in the Muslim world. And, of course, George Bush is culpable for its spread. On Tuesday night, north of Kabul, a woman radio program host, Zakia Zaki, was shot dead as she slept beside her 10-month old child. Seven bullets were pumped into her, leaving six children orphans. All of this according to the Times's Abdul Waheed Wafa.
Do you remember those days in childhood, when you felt like everybody was out having fun while you were stuck inside doing your homework? That's how I felt yesterday. Everybody was blogging about health care reform and mandates. But there I was, holed up in university library, doing archival research for an upcoming article. Wait for me, guys! So let me try to make up for lost time. First, and most important, two folks who worked with Senator Obama on his health care plan -- David Cutler and Jacob Hacker -- have posted items clarifying the plan's virtues.
Uh oh. Now Fred Thompson has a website. Look out world! Last week, when I wrote that I thought Thompson was the Republican version of Wes Clark--i.e. an overhyped potential candidate who'll flame out once he actually gets in the race--a few people objected by pointing out that, unlike Clark, Thompson isn't a political novice. True. But is there anything in Thompson's political career that makes you think he's actually ready for a presidential campaign?
If one clear winner seemed to emerge from Sunday night's Democratic debate, last night's Republican gabfest produced no such consensus. That's perhaps to be expected, given the ideological divisions within the GOP. Still, McCain and Giuliani remain ahead of the pack, according to this survey of Internet opinion: Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post Winner: McCain "As is usually the case in a Republican debate, the big winner of the night was God. But John McCain finished a close second. This was vintage McCain.
by Sanford LevinsonThe latest CBS/New York Times poll conducted between May 18-23 shows the "favorable" rating of Vice President Dick Cheney at a record low. See here. Perhaps the White House takes heart that the "not favorable" rating has actually dropped because the "undecided"s and "haven't heard"s went up by a total 14 points.
by Eric Rauchway A while back, my department hosted a panel officially titled "Historical Scholarship and the New Media," but everyone called it "the blogging panel" anyway.
by David GreenbergMichael Kazin's recent post about our hunger for authenticity in presidential candidates--really, in all politicians--takes on what I think is one of the most important and difficult issues in our political culture today. Although the charge of inauthenticity sticks to some politicians more than others--and not always fairly--few if any are immune. I wrote a book suggesting that in the post-World War II era Richard Nixon became a magnet for our collective anxieties about this kind of inauthenticity.
Since TNR is now Porn Central... From the Times's front page story on how the adult film business is adjusting to the internet: "There's not a whole lot of story--it's basically right to the sex, but we're consistent with the quality," [a porn producer] said, noting that the company is also careful to pick interesting backdrops. "We use different locations, rooms and couches."[Italics Mine] Different couches! Wow. --Isaac Chotiner