On the heels of her Internet support for the Rutgers women's basketball team, now Hillary is going to see them in person. One question: has she always been a Scarlet Knights fan? Update: Reader D.T. writes in to chide me that "the talking point that Hillary is a fake Yankees fan really needs to die" and includes a link to this Media Matters report arguing that Hillary did indeed like the Yanks before she set her eyes on the Senate. --Jason Zengerle
One of the (many) vexing things about our political culture is the ability of politicians to both define a speech they are giving as "big" and then rope the entire press corps into reporting tired cliches as newsworthy. Case in point: On the front page of the NYT's website, Adam Nagourney has a piece on John McCain's monumentally huge Iraq speech today, which the senator's campaign has been hyping for weeks. And what did the Arizonan say? "Our defeat in Iraq would constitute a defeat in the war against terror and extremism and would make the world a much more dangerous place," he said.
by Darrin McMahonWho's tired of GNP? A lot of people, it seems.
I am finally in a hotel that has internet connections which work. This means I can catch up on the news and even reflect on it. Actually, the English language press--which means mainly the Hindustan Times and the Times of India--have virtually no reports from or on America or Europe. And even in its articles about India, the front page is usually devoted to cricket or stars of Bollywood. Today's HT (not Herald Tribune) reports in a big story on page three that a particular starlet, Aishwarya Rai, will use 15 kg of henna for her henna ceremony.
Well, the hotel at which I could finally read several newspaper websites and my incoming e-mails did not allow or technologically permit me to send e-mails. So, aside from the following two postings being a bit out of sequence, they reflect the incoherence of my experience in India, about its sublime beauty in many places and its grinding poverty in others. We did not go to Bombay or other big cities. So we did not see how the thousands of graduates of the Indian Institutes of Technology have transformed the economic landscape (those of its graduates, that is, who are not now in America.)
Most coal companies aren't exactly thrilled by the prospect of Democrats putting a cap on carbon emissions in the coming years. So that means... lobbying. Whole shovels full. In March, the day before Al Gore testified before Congress on climate change, the coal industry held a $1,000-a-head fundraiser for Virginia Democrat Rick Boucher, chair of the House subcommittee in charge of global warming legislation.
Last week, I blogged about the decision by American gay rights activists to not make use of the State Department's annual human rights report regarding the treatment of gays abroad. The activists in question say they refused to publicize the report because Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay have made any research compiled by the United States on human rights morally dubious. The debate is outlined here (with a heavy dose of opinion) by Doug Ireland (who, perhaps hoping to rile some feathers, calls TNR, "neo-liberal") in New York's Gay City News.
by Linda Hirshman Cass Sunstein has done us all his usual good service by bringing some old-fashionedcivic republican analysis to the newer phenomenon of the blogosphere. That similar trends have been observed in satellite TV and radio reflects, I fear, that the blogosphere at most, reinforces the polarization of the society.
by Cass Sunstein Just out: The Supreme Court has ruled against the Bush administration in the climate change case. It is too soon to know whether this is a major development in terms of climate change, but it is a remarkable outcome in terms of the law. The plaintiffs faced several serious obstacles: It was not clear that they had standing, it was not (entirely) clear that EPA's decision was reviewable under the ordinary standards, and it was not clear that the EPA's decision was inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
I've been in London for 24 hours and already I am reminded wistfully of how much better--broader and deeper--the American press is than the British. Now, I don't much like the Guardian's editorial line. But its reporting is, save for the Financial Times, superior to all its competitors.