SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home CPAC Panel on Racism Proves That CPAC Needs a Panel on Anger...

THE RACE CARD MARCH 15, 2013

CPAC Panel on Racism Proves That CPAC Needs a Panel on Anger Management

Take a moment to browse the CPAC agenda, and guess which event today was most likely to devolve into a roomful of conservatives yelling “Can I just say something?” and “Stop lecturing us!” If you guessed “Trump the Race Card: Are You Sick and Tired of Being Called a Racist and You Know You’re Not One?”—a panel organized by the Tea Party Patriots—then pat yourself on the back.

The panel's intended star was KCarl Smith, a conservative speaker who tours the country telling audiences that Frederick Douglass was a conservative. (And not just any conservative, but one with a knack for predicting the future. The publicity materials for the event said that Douglass believed in school choice and marriage as defined by God, a century before school vouchers and gay marriage were political issues.) Smith offered up Douglass as the modern conservative movement’s original black friend, a person whose name his Tea Party audience can forever invoke to prove that they are not racist. “Frederick Douglass was not a racist,” Smith said. “What we believe is in lockstep with what Frederick Douglass”—a capitalist, a rich man when he died, and an adviser to Lincoln, a Republican—“believed.”

Where everything went off the rails was Smith’s examples of Democratic racism. “The 16th Street Church bombers were Democrats, because they were a part of the KKK,” who were Democrats. This was too much for Kim Brown, a host and producer for Voice of Russia, who was in the audience. “Are you kidding me?”

You can imagine how things went from there. The crowd’s loud demands that Smith “sit down” and “get that women's studies stuff out of here"—this, after Brown correctly identified the year in with Sojourner Truth died—emboldened attendee Scott Terry, of North Carolina, to question the wisdom of Frederick Douglass Republicanism. “Why can’t we become, like, Booker T. Washington Republicans?" he asked, citing Washington's pro-segregation views. "It seems like your message is reaching out at the expense of young white Southern males like myself. I feel like my demographic is being disenfranchised.” When Smith recalled that Douglass wrote a letter to his former slave master forgiving him, Scott yelled, “For giving him food and shelter?” (Scott had some charming things to say about women, too.)

“Martin Luther King was a Marxist!”... “SHUT UP!”... Suffice it to say, there was plenty of screaming until Smith wrangled a microphone and calmed everybody down.1 Audience members, still piqued, reached the consensus that Brown and Terry were both plants paid by George Soros. “Was that the liberal media?” one elderly woman asked another. “This event ... has been ruined,” said another.

Smith tried to make the whole disaster instructional. This is what he means when he says that Republicans are losing an unfair, virulent liberal propaganda war to make “conservative” a word connoting radicalism and racism. The secret weapon is Douglass. Mention Douglass, and “the race card comes off the table. Class welfare comes off the table.... You can’t out-victimize Frederick Douglass.” Unless you’re a conservative.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 4 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

4 comments

3,15,13, 9:15 pm, est///What a freak show!

- basman

March 15, 2013 at 9:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Those dumb conservatives, they will believe anything: up is down, black is white, slavery is protection. Liberals could never be lead to believe something that is obviously false. Or could they? Senator Paul convinced lots of liberals that his suggestion that Obama would target innocent Americans for killing with drones is an issue of civil rights. Civil rights! The issue is whether we are at war, and if we are, who is the enemy. If we are at war, Obama should kill the bastards any way he can, whether with drones or pumpkins, whether they are citizens of the US or citizens of Mars. In war, there are no civil rights for the enemy. Senator Paul succeeded in diverting attention from the real issue, and raising the obviously false idea that Obama would target innocent Americans for killing. Who would fall for that? Lots of liberals.

- rayward

March 16, 2013 at 9:16am

Hey, Oui, je suis d'accord avec vous. 3,16,13, 1:42, est.

- basman

March 16, 2013 at 1:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHOW 1 RESPONSE

Sorry, but the democratic party ties to racism and eugenics is very strong and very clear, and very alive today (100 years and going strong!). Go read the comments on any article talking about Ben Carson. Look at the cartoons the press happily printed showing Condoleezza Rice as Aunt Jemima. And the calls from the left that Colin Powell was an uncle tom. And then wind all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt's live exhibition of Filipino "monkey men", and thrown in LBJ's "When I appoint a ni**er to the bench, I want everyone to know he's a ni**ger"///Yes indeed, a long history to be proud of. ///

- seattleeng

March 17, 2013 at 6:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

1

As I write this, Brown and a huddle of red-faced adversaries are at it now, out in the hall. The fighting has become infectious. Matthew Heimbach—a sweaty young man in a Confederate Flag shirt, and president of the Towson University Youth for Western Civilization—is yelling at an old Tea Party woman about Lincoln. “He allocated millions of dollars to send Africans back to Liberia! Look. It. Up."

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close