SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home 'Mad Men' Mondays: 'The Beautiful Girls'

BOOKS AND ARTS SEPTEMBER 17, 2010

'Mad Men' Mondays: 'The Beautiful Girls'

This is the new column in TNR’s weekly series of "Mad Men" episode recaps. Caution: It contains spoilers. Click here for last week's review.

Where to begin? With a eulogy for the dearly departed Miss Blankenship, erstwhile hellcat, whose every raspy one-liner was comedy gold? Or perhaps we should start by saying that Joan and Roger’s post-mugging clinch was both lamely contrived (a near-death experience on an L.A. backlot street leading into a kiss—how very daytime soap) and also truly sexy. Or maybe we should kick things off with yet another paean to Peggy, whose intellectual jousting with her would-be suitor, the radical journalist Abe Drexler, proved, yet again, that she's got more integrity than any other major character on the show—and is more open-minded to boot.

Let's start instead by calling "The Beautiful Girls" an imperfect but satisfying episode, almost as strong an ensemble piece as "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" and "The Summer Man." It had its theses and its points, but it came at them obliquely. It wasn’t swinging for the fences like "The Suitcase," which focused mainly on two characters, Peggy and Don. The tone was fairly light overall, and the disposal of poor Miss Blankenship's body was a great bit of silent comedy-style clowning, small in the frame and nearly wordless.  But one can't dismiss the hour as "just" a comedy. The mugging was realistically frightening, charged with the possibility of lethal violence. (It also tested middle-class liberal pieties; the robber who took Joan’s engagement ring was black.) There were many purely dramatic scenes, including the office conversations between Joan and Roger (with Joan maintaining that although she didn’t regret their clinch, she won’t be repeating it) and Faye and Don's argument when Don thoughtlessly pushes Faye to mother his runaway daughter because she's the only available woman around. 

What was the episode "about"? The fact that one can’t instantly answer that question was a compliment to screenwriters Dahvi Waller and Matthew Weiner and director Michael Uppendahl. One could say the hour is about the plight of women in early 1960s America as they assert their independence within confining, male-dominated social structures. The final, equalizing image of Joan, Peggy and Faye standing in the same elevator car (going down, alas) seems to invite that reading. So does Miss Blankenship’s comment about Faye (“It's hard the way she breezes past me. She's pushy, that one. I guess that's what it takes”) and the charming but overwritten and awkwardly-delivered monologue by Peggy’s friend Joyce (Zosia Mamet, David Mamet’s daughter) comparing men to soup and women to containers. (There are times where “Mad Men” monologues sound like perfect audition pieces for young actors when they should just sound like people talking.)

“I'm not good with kids,” Faye tells Don, after he again presses her into child-care service and then compounds the insult by unthinkingly asking her to fix him a drink. “It feels like there was a test and I failed it,” she says. I don’t think she failed it, but it was definitely a test. And although she accepted Don’s apologetic hug, there was a chill between then, as well there should have been. Part of the reason Don is a subpar dad is because he (and his even colder fish of an ex-wife, Betty) keep subcontracting the care and feeding of their kids to other people. Many people of their social class did that, but only men felt it was their birthright—and in this episode he treated an accomplished professional colleague as if she were Dr. Babysitter. (Faye made it clear that it wasn’t the idea of looking after his child that offended her, but that he gave her no choice but to do it.) The scene where Sally made French toast for her bachelor father—with rum instead of syrup—was charming, but it had a queasy undertone. Don doesn't just need somebody to mother his children, he himself craves mothering. Sally, who's seen plenty of examples of Don's paternal incompetence and man-child selfishness, slips into that role with unsettling ease.

In the end, though, I wouldn’t boil the hour down to a meditation on feminism or anything else along those lines. “The Beautiful Girls” isn’t a gender studies term paper, just a portrait of a particular time and place that happens to include three professional women. Peggy, Joan, and Faye all get pushed to conform to the desires of men they find attractive, and in the end they all assert themselves—but in a way that’s right for them personally, with no implication that any self-respecting woman should do exactly the same thing.  They get to own their mistakes as surely as they own their successes. That’s not feminism. It’s humanism. It’s part of the same storytelling impulse that summoned great emotion from the sight of neglected brat Sally finally getting what neither of her parents seem able to give her—a hug—and that turned Miss Blankenship’s death from an occasion for classic Don Draper double-takes into a bonding session between Bert and Roger over a woman they’d both slept with, and who meant a great deal to them. “She was born in 1898 in a barn. She died on the 37th floor of a skyscraper,” Bert said, struggling to define her in an obituary. “She’s an astronaut.”

You could also say the episode was about civil rights in a wider sense—a topic broached in the bar conversation between Peggy and Abe, with whom she'd locked lips at a beatnik party in "The Rejected." Abe pushes Peggy to justify working for an ad agency that's doing business with Fillmore Auto, a Boston-based company that's being boycotted in the south over its racist hiring practices. "Most of the things Negroes can't do, I can't do either, and nobody seems to care," Peggy says. And when Abe points out that Sterling-Draper-Cooper-Pryce has no black copywriters, she replies, "I'm sure they could fight their way in like I did. Believe me, nobody wanted me there."

I like how this scene allows for the possibility that both characters can be right and wrong at the same time. Peggy is drawing a false equivalency between a middle-class white woman’s struggles and the struggles of the descendants of former slaves. (She's also forgetting that there were no black secretaries at Sterling Cooper, and for all the humiliations she suffered in that job it's hard to see how she could have elbowed her way into copy writing without it.) Abe, meanwhile, has a touch of beatnik drama-queenery about him—he titles a prospective article “Nuremberg on Madison Avenue"—but he’s also an honorable man who won’t let Peggy’s sloppy thinking pass just because he wants to bed her. At the same time, Peggy’s comparison isn’t totally off-base. White women circa 1965 aren’t getting shot, hung, and attacked by dogs for daring to assert their equality. But there is discrimination, and Peggy deals with it every day. She’s right to be offended when Abe seems to brush off the indignities she’s endured.

In last week’s recap, I wondered if Season Four’s glancing references to the civil rights movement weren't a red herring, and whether the show’s true interest instead lay in women’s rights. With just three episodes to go, that suspicion looks as though it’ll be proved correct (unless Weiner and company rally by building the season finale around President Lyndon Johnson issuing his executive order enforcing affirmative action, and I really hope they don’t). If the season ends up having focused mainly on feminism, however, that will beg the question of why Weiner thought it was a good idea to make the civil rights struggle an atmospheric detail or a metaphor for something else. The only black characters on this show have been domestics and elevator operators—and now a mugger. Even if you take the show’s upper-middle-class white milieu into account, the arms-length respect paid to African American sacrifice feels like an evasion posing as an acknowledgment. The topic is so rich, and still so emotionally powerful, that treating it as a looming presence and nothing more is dramatically risky. Whatever “Mad Men” is doing here, it had better pay off.

Matt Zoller Seitz is a contributor to Salon and the founder of Slant's “The House Next Door,” where he has written extensively about “The Sopranos” and other series.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

I would only add that last night's episode was a perfect chance to have a return of the black wife of one of the ad guys...I can't remember which one, now. Who knows what they're doing, but I'm sure enjoying the ride.

- caseykap

September 20, 2010 at 10:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How intensely aware were the denizens of the 60's that they were living through a social and cultural paradigm shift? I'm not sure I fully understand the author's beef that "the arms-length respect paid to African American sacrifice feels like an evasion posing as an acknowledgment. " People who lived in the middle ages did not know they were living in the "dark ages" and 15th century Europeans did not look out of the window and say to themselves: oh, look the renaissance has begun. How wonderful. We understand better how the cosmos works and what's real perspective. Language always lags behind the events. By the time language catches up to it, the reductive narratives have already set in. In this 60's period piece I suspect the intention is to reverse what has become the conventional wisdom about that decade. They try to divest the language of its excess baggage, strip the sentimentalized patina, refresh the meanings, in order to lend us back bang into the midst of it, with the innocence of ignorance of the world to come. It's almost Miltonian in its ambition. And I think as least as much I have seen of this series, it has worked. It's another Deadwood. And it is very much in opposition to what I've seen coming out of the BBC, whose dramas of late tend to inject 21st century sanctimonious sensibilities and cliches into period dramas. After watching the latest episodes of "Foyle's War" for example I can appreciate all the more the great intellectual work that has gone into the preparation of "Mad Men". Quite apart from the brilliant visual recreation of the sixties.

- noga1

September 20, 2010 at 11:21am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought the scene in Don's apartment, where Sally curls up on the couch blissfully happy to be with her daddy, was very effective. I think one of the series' small but magnificent achievements is to show how Don for all his faults can meet his daughter's emotional needs, and connect with her, much more than Betty ever could.

- ironyroad

September 20, 2010 at 12:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

noga1: I'm not asking the show to afflict the characters with a false, anachronistic consciousness about the time they're living in. In fact I'm not saying anything at all about the characters. It's the show I have minor problems with. This is a writing and filmmaking issue: The storytellers are God and they can choose to emphasize whatever they want. I do think it seems odd and often ungainly when they choose to make one of the most important and emotionally wrenching political upheavals in American history a constant presence on the series, but as a Greek chorus, yet at the same time they find room to give an Italian-American gay man and a lesbian actual characters to play. That's why I use the word "evasive." It's as if they want to do more with this subject but are terrified of not being able to please everyone, so they're hedging their bets, obliquely acknowledging what's happening with black America but expending much of their energy on feminism and the middle class version of the counterculture, which it just so happens they're more comfortable with. I would actually prefer it if the show were less aware of the Civil Rights struggle, and built that into its portrait of the time and place -- or else highlighted the characters' superficial awareness of what's happening just a bit more pointedly (since ironic humor is something the show does quite well). They're kind of half-in, half-out of it right now, and have been all season. I don't think it's a call for anachronism or an example of PC thinking to say that if they can build a character for Sal, who doesn't really fit into the mainstream either, they should be able to dig into Carla a bit more, or bring a new, recurring black character onto a series that is set, after all, in New York freakin' City, a city that was on the vanguard of social change and artistic innovation. A musician, maybe, or a comedian, or a local politician whose approval they need in order to shoot an ad someplace. It's not unthinkable that they could manage this, and it wouldn't be "unrealistic" or anachronistic if they did it. I love the show, you know. I just don't think they handle every single thing perfectly, and this is a big area that could use some work.

- Matt Zoller Seitz

September 20, 2010 at 4:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought Noga's point was beside your comment, MSZ though I like her point a lot, a lot. I think yours is a wide ranging and, again, excellent review but I think your concerns about the treatment of the black white civil rights issues are not well taken. As you comment in response to Noga "...the storytellers are God..." They can tread as lightly or as heavily as they choose on these issues and your concern that their skirting or under developing is "odd and often ungainly" especially in comparison with the treatment of the other issues they take is critically invalid, I'd argue. This criticism is external to the show. The show's only obligation is to do well what it does--make television drama as it sees fit. As the old esthete said, "We must grant the artist his subject, his idea, his donné: our criticism is applied only to what he makes of it." Which is a refined way of saying the "the storytellers are God". This particular criticism of yours violates that critical canon and is prescriptive. If you have an internal beef, one coming from within the show as a show, fair enough. That's criticism along the lines of "what he makes of it." A few of other points: The scene opens with Don and the Doc having fantastic sex, so clearly he became ready for it since last week when he held off. I sensed too an implicit, subtle rift starting to open for them in their last scene. I thought I noticed that the Doc doesn't object to pouring Don a drink on the ground of his assumption that that is a kind of role for her in relation to him and not so much out of resentment for him dumping his kid on her as out of her own concern that she failed his "test", which, by the way, I don't see at all as a test, just Don being Don and using what is to hand to ease his own way when confronted with conflicting obligations. She has to my mind supplicated herself to him. I also noted that this time Don didn't write in his journal, started, but just gave it up. And he lied about having swum as the reason why he needed to take a nap. Which is to say, his self improvement program from last week was qualified some this week, I thought. I agree with Ironyroad's observation. I felt when Betts was waiting for her daughter and smoking impatiently, angry to have been kept waiting for a few minutes, and then constrained to tone down her anger and appear loving to her daughter because 1/2 the ad agency office was looking on, Sally was being sent back into a cauldron of waiting emotional abuse from her monster of a mother. Betts is being shown as self-absorbedly inhumane just short of caricature. The laying in wait emotional abuse has for me an analogue in physical abuse. I felt scared and terribly sad for Sally as she's returned to her mother, her crying, running away agony in the office at the prospect wrenching.

- basman

September 20, 2010 at 10:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

p.s. For anyone interested, I have totally worked out the meaning of The Famous Blue Raincoat and have got its meaning conceptualized as one word, all as supported by direct textual evidence. That's on that long, long, long thread.

- basman

September 20, 2010 at 10:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close