SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home In the Northwest, Angry Voters Dump Pocketbook Initiatives

THE AVENUE NOVEMBER 11, 2010

In the Northwest, Angry Voters Dump Pocketbook Initiatives

Portland Transit Mall--Portland, Ore.--Wikipedia CommonsDespite the Democratic firewall in the Pacific Northwest last week for congressional representatives, many ballot measures thought to be supported by Democrats failed. In Washington state, measures to establish an income tax on high earners, sell bonds for school energy retrofits, and privatize state liquor sales all failed. Additionally, sales taxes on candy and bottled water were repealed and a two-thirds legislative supermajority for tax increases was established (again).

Across the mighty Columbia in Oregon, five of seven ballot measures passed. However, these were not pocketbook measures but more housekeeping on judicial sentencing, veteran’s housing programs, the sessions of the legislature, and bonding limits.

In the Portland metropolitan area, the failure of a TriMet bond measure to upgrade aging buses and bus stops perhaps epitomizes the agonizing fiscal crisis facing municipalities around the country.

Passage would have enabled TriMet, the regional transportation authority, to sell $125 million worth of property tax-backed bonds to address its bus transit needs in the face of an overall $60 million agency deficit. Many Portland advocates for the poor have maintained that TriMet favors its world-renowned light rail system at the expense of buses that more low-income riders use.

Why did it fail? The most compelling reason is that in the weeks leading up to the election TriMet’s union, Amalgamated Transit, has been engaged in a very public spat over their expired contract. It’s headed to binding arbitration, where the union will try to preserve its 100 percent employer funded health care and other benefits that amount to 152 percent of wages according to a recent audit.

Unemployment in the Portland metropolitan area is 10.2 percent.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show 1 comment

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

1 comments

I've heard a lot about how progressive cities like Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, etc., truly lack a regional diversity and thus short-change their minority or low-income populations. I know that in Minnneapolis, at least, their Hiawatha Line light-rail actually has a stop in a ghetto, where a lot of Somali refugees live. In Portland and Seattle, I have heard (though haven't seen) that their light-rail systems do not have many minority or low-income users (I'm not equating minority with low-income, but the employment differences between whites and other demographics is staggering in these progressive cities). I have a lot of hope in regional-minded metropolitan action-cooperation between cities and counties, suburbs and cities, etc. However, with the fiscal situation we have, it seems that municipalities are opting to make life as comfortable as possible for those that have wealth and incomes that provide a decent living, at the expense of people who desperately need help. It makes sense that people are rejecting proposals that try and make life better for poorer residents. Right now in America, we honestly don't care about the poor anymore, or the struggling workers out there.

- RedState

November 11, 2010 at 3:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close