THE FAMOUS DOOR OCTOBER 8, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
We know how old John Lennon would have been this Saturday—70—but who he would have been, we can only imagine. There were so many Johns: Teddy boy, moptop, Walrus, avant-gardist, Mr. Ono, politicker, house husband, and, finally, in the months before his death 30 years ago this December, model of middle-age content.
"Grow old with me," Lennon once crooned into a cassette recorder he used for making quickie demos in his apartment in the Dakota. "The best is yet to be..." Lennon had started writing music again after several years of semi-retirement, and the new tune was one he never got a chance to record properly before he was shot by a demented fan on the sidewalk of his building.
He died too soon to grow old with his audience. Yet countless people who hold his music dear have been growing old with him. That is to say, Lennon's public has been aging with him as an enduring presence in its lives, even as that presence has become progressively, sometimes strangely commercialized and often hard to reconcile with the realities of Lennon's life and work.
Since the mid-’60s, when Lennon began leavening The Beatles' moptop cheeriness with sober ruminations such as "In My Life" and expressions of doubt and anxiety such as "Help!" and "I'm a Loser," his music was precociously mature. Reflective and self-critical, many of his songs had the point of view of adulthood, made palatable to teen fans through the incongruous bounciness of The Beatles' music. Paul McCartney drew from the adult world—particularly from the pre-rock music of his parents and grandparents, in songs such as "When I'm Sixty-Four" and "Honey Pie"—but in service to nostalgia or sentiment. Paul was old-fashioned, John an old soul. Lennon made music to grow up by, and young people of several generations now have grown up following his lead.
I was born almost 20 years after Lennon, and I discovered The Beatles quite a while after Beatlemania. Still, like my own children, who came to The Beatles more than a decade after Lennon's death, I derived from John's Beatles songs a sense that adulthood was neither an ideal of lovey-dovey bliss or a joke (the dual message of Paul's tunes), but something complicated and forbidding but within my capacity to grasp and maybe even bear.
Aware of his influence and duly terrified by it, Lennon made his infamous comment about The Beatles being "more popular than Jesus" as a distress signal, a warning to Beatlemaniacs (and no doubt to himself) of the hazards of pop idolatry. In later remarks, he showed that he saw the mammoth scale of his fame as life-threatening, although he perceived only some of the dangers of celebrity and never protected himself from the dark potential of fandom, its closeness to fanaticism. "The king is always killed by his courtiers," he told an interviewer after Elvis Presley died. "The king is overfed, overdrugged, overindulged—anything to keep the king tied to his throne. Most people in that position never wake up."
Lennon, in his savviness and cynicism, understood how the celebrity culture carries risks of early death—literal death, creative death, or death of the spirit—at the same time it glamorizes that death. "The biggest prize is when you die—a really big one for dying in public," he said in the Playboy interview he did a few months before he died. "Okay—those are the things we are not interested in doing."
He never wanted a death cult, nor a cult in life; Lennon wanted to live, like the rest of us—very much like the rest of us or, more precisely, how he imagined non-celebrities to be living. The life he sought in his last years was essentially a model of middle-age domestic tranquility, a dream vision of ordinariness enacted by an extraordinary man. He rambled around the rambling apartment he shared with Yoko Ono and their young child, Sean; he baked bread; he strolled his son around Central Park and took him to the YMCA for swimming lessons; he watched television and listened to Bing Crosby records. Apart from his having an avant-garde artist wife to handle the business affairs and his having gotten out of the house sometimes to make hit records, Lennon was essentially living the same life as my Aunt Rose.
He seemed to find contentment in an almost parodically conventional grown-up life, a proto-Reagan-era paradigm of domesticity, though his case is radicalized, arguably, by the fact that he was a male rock superstar rather than an Italian-American seamstress like my aunt. That was the last Lennon, apparently the Lennon whom John most wanted to be.
That Lennon is largely forgotten today and virtually absent from the images of John on the t-shirts and screen savers that fuel the public consciousness. Branding both Lennon and the people who wear and use them, the representations of Lennon pervasive today depict him in his most overtly radical phase, handily abandoning the ambiguity and the irony of his original messages. We see him in the pseudo-military gear he fancied in the early '70s, with the single word "Revolution" below the picture. (Lennon's lyrics to the song "Revolution" were mostly anti-revolution.) We see him bearded and grim over the phrase "Working Class Hero." (Again, the actual meaning of the song, which was fiercely sardonic, is lost.) And we see him as he looked before Sean's birth, in sun-glasses and that sleeveless white "New York City" t-shirt, his arms crossed, his expression blank.
The songs he wrote in his final years are musical testaments to the traditional conceptions of adult normalcy that he seemed to revel in as he approached middle age. He wrote love songs to his wife as syrupy (if not quite as silly) as McCartney's valentines to Linda ("Woman"), pretty lullabies to his son Sean ("Beautiful Boy"), and paeans to middle age ("Watching the Wheels" and "Borrowed Time"). "Good to be older," he sings (in "Borrowed Time"), "Less complications, everything clear." Among the songs like "Grow Old with Me," which Lennon recorded only as a homemade demo, was a buoyant, tuneful country song in the vein of a Hank Williams tune. It was called "Life Begins at 40," and this is how it starts:
They say life begins at forty
Age is just a state of mind
If all that's true, you know that I've
Been dead for thirty-nine
12 comments
I'm older, almost 60, so the Beatles invasion was part of my own growing up experience; indeed, I saw them (in Jacksonville) on their tour. And we were aware that Lennon was different from the rest, even if he and McCartney shared credit for songs (the more creative songs) that most everybody understood were Lennon's. Their influence could not be overstated. When Revolver was released, it was like a thunderbolt. By the time St. Pepper's was released, the original Beatles and their teeny bopper sound were long gone, as were our own childhoods with them. Then the White Album (no name, just a white cover), or Christmas Album as we called it (it was released just before Christmas). And it was over. Not because Lennon and McCartney ceased producing music but because by then there were so many imitators. And the Beatles split-up soon followed. Lennon eventually became a cariacature, maybe as an antidote to celebrity, maybe in response to aging. I might agree with Hajdu's assessment of the older Lennon, the aging, and content, Italian American aunt, but only because the original Lennon (and he certainly was an original) had died long before.
- rayward
October 8, 2010 at 7:38am
The line of the day: “Paul was old-fashioned, John an old soul.” Whence Paul expired, musically, with the Beatles, and John is undying.
- toddgitlin
October 8, 2010 at 9:32am
Those who come to The Beatles as a completed body of work (as David Hadju did) cannot comprehend what it was like to be there at the Big Bang and to be carried out on waves of creation to the edge of the universe whose boundaries The Beatles staked out and whose interior is merely being backfilled by all who came after.
- Mikelawyr22
October 8, 2010 at 10:29am
Hear, hear, toddgitlin. Are you the Todd Gitlin? If so, I have hugely enjoyed your writing across the decades.
- liberal reformer
October 8, 2010 at 6:46pm
Happy birthday, John! Nate Hajdu, David's Son
- hajdu2
October 9, 2010 at 9:15am
Happy birthday, John! Nate Hajdu, David's Son
- hajdu2
October 9, 2010 at 9:15am
Happy birthday, John! Nate Hajdu, David's Son
- hajdu2
October 9, 2010 at 9:15am
Happy birthday, John! Nate Hajdu, David's Son
- hajdu2
October 9, 2010 at 9:15am
Happy birthday, John! Nate Hajdu, David's Son
- hajdu2
October 9, 2010 at 9:15am
I'm with Malahat on what Mikelawyr2 said.
- basman
October 9, 2010 at 9:32am
Nice piece, and a good tribute to John. I'm always surprised, however, that fans (& critics, etc.) always feel the need to compare Paul & John. You do it quite a bit (as do many who talk about the Beatles), and whether you meant it or not, you're preference for John was communicated. It's funny--it almost is done unconsciously in the way that two brothers might be compared by an outsider. One can tell that this phenomenon is unique to Paul & John because George and Ringo are almost never included in the comparisons. Anyway, part of the reason I love the Beatles is because they allowed their individuality and separate personalities to come out. There aren't many other bands that were successful at this 'personal touch'. Perhaps this is also the reason many people take such a strong preference to just one half of the 20th century's most influential songwriting duo. Perhaps the reason they were such an effective team is that they were two powerful personalities.
- cleifperry
October 9, 2010 at 10:58am
I'm in the middle of a 2 year Beatles fascination and John Lennon really stand out after 50 years. Almost Messianic in his honesty and simplicity. Not having been there, I was born in 1962, to experience the explosion. I came of age in the late 1970's, early 1980's. Playing Pinball on the basement of the Alice Lloyd Dromitory in Ann Arbor when I heard the news of Lennon's death. One of the saddest moments of my life. Lennon's death really fit into two trilogies. The first Trilogy is the death of the rock stars that really signaled the end of the pioneers of Rock. Keith Moon in 1978, John Bonham in September, 1980 and finally John in December, 1980. The bands that had created Rock & Roll suddenly were gone. We all felt a little older as 1980 ended. But Lennon's inclusion in the 2nd trilogy of assasinations elevates him into another level. The world was shocked that such a peaceful man could be shot. There was nothing he did that ever envisioned the violent death of the kookiness of the killer. But 4 months later and equally crazy criminal would shot the President, Ronald Reagan. When the Pope John Paul II was shot a couple of months after Reagan we knew the world was crazy. Three men of ideas were shot for seeming inexplicable reasons. But their ideas would take off. I would have loved to see John Lennon and how he would have handled the world in his later years. Tomight a little walk through the neighborhood with my i-Phone listening to Let It Be, perhaps a little White Album. Good Night Yoko, Good Night John.
- CRS9TNR
October 10, 2010 at 5:13pm