THE PLANK DECEMBER 4, 2006
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
It's so hard to escape the PC Police these days! As the venerable Dylan might put it, they'll stone you when you call a bad thing "gay," they'll stone you when you fete Columbus Day, they'll stone you if you love foie gras and veal, and now they'll even stone you if you want to skip a meal! This from this week's National Review (sus req):
Get ready for Fat Studies. ... The University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee is offering a course titled "The Social Construction of Obesity." There is no such thing as being fat, you see; "fatness" is just a figment. Nor is there any substance to claims by "scientists" that "obesity" is linked to diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease. Those are just ploys by the oppressive power structure ...
OK, "Fat Studies" as an academic discipline is totally silly. But NR's mocking the idea that an oppressive power structure is out to keep the fat man down forces me to exhume perhaps my favorite NR article ever printed, Dave Shiflett's "Chief of the Fat Police", an extended, philosophy-and-pop-culture-suffused rant against the oppressive power structure out to keep the fat man down.
It also, in the course of defending fat individualism in the face of societal pressure ("The message [Clinton] and his ilk hope to pound into the public consciousness is that every time we order French fries we do damage ... to the nation's economy"), berating us for cultural imperialism ("Parents in those sad nations [Angola, Botswana, and Malawi] would strap their children to the back of a shark if they thought there was a one in ten chance he'd drop them off at an American beach with a Wendy's nearby"), and providing positive fat role models ("Santa isn't fat by accident"), definitely qualifies for inclusion in what the New York Times article on which this week's NR blurb is based calls the "fat liberation" canon.
--Eve Fairbanks
6 comments
Goddess bless 'em! Apropos this post as well as today's lead topic (liberaltarians), my Enchantress (liberal) opined a few nights ago that I eat to excess because I'm depressed. I (libertarian) countered that I eat for any number of reasons, depression not being among them. To prove my point I invited her over so I could work up an appetite. One day I will die, but why push it? I'd be crazy to diet; I'd reach my target weight and be preening in a shop window when a bus would jump the curb and crush me like an empty bag of Tater Tots. Meanwhile at night my cat Charlie insists on crawling under the covers to press against my radiating equator. He lies on his side, eyes closed, purring, kneading my languid obesity, a kitten come home to mama.
- williamyard
December 4, 2006 at 5:26pm
From everything I have gleened, she may be a candidate for a PhD. And, williamyard, wow. No judgment, just wow.
- beancntr
December 4, 2006 at 6:48pm
(sus req) Suspicion required?
- bjudson
December 4, 2006 at 7:10pm
man, you are singing today. For a fat dude, you can still lure the ladies. What's your secret?
- MrCookie1
December 5, 2006 at 9:57am
Kibble sways the four-legged pussies; for the two-legged variety, cash is always good.
- williamyard
December 5, 2006 at 11:40am
Iggy my man, you are one of a kind. Cash, I have got to remember that... oh yes, you have ventured into a danger zone. A few weeks ago, I wanted to write "p---y hound" but thought better of it and used some inoffensive, Fred Barnesian/George Will limp wristed facsimile. I bow to your ballsy verbal insouciance...
- MrCookie1
December 5, 2006 at 2:49pm