SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Republicans, The Payroll Tax Cut, And The Economy

THE STUDY FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Republicans, The Payroll Tax Cut, And The Economy

Congressional Republicans, still licking their wounds after a bruising, losing fight with President Obama over the payroll tax cut last December, have preemptively surrendered this time around. Late last year, they fought against a payroll tax cut extension and succeeded in limiting it to only two months. But the politics of the fight were disastrous, and this time they’ve offered to extend the holiday without even insisting on offsets. What does this mean for the economy?  

A 2011 report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities inspires relief, but not optimism. By avoiding a premature halt to payroll tax holiday, we may have avoided what the report calls a “self-inflicted blow,” but the authors note that because the tax cut is already in effect, its extension “would provide no new boost to the economy—it would simply prevent the withdrawal of existing support for economic growth.” That said, the tax cut’s impact is substantial: It saves the average family about $934 per year, and in 2011 it boosted all workers’ take-home pay by about $120 billion. Independent economists argued that a failure to extend the tax cut could reduce economic growth by about two-thirds of a percentage point in early 2012, and as much as a whole percentage point over the course of the year—leading to perhaps one million fewer jobs by year’s end. Feels good to have dodged that bullet, doesn’t it? 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 2 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

2 comments

"That said, the tax cut’s impact is substantial: It saves the average family about $934 per year . . ." I favor the "tax holiday" for the tax, the payroll tax, paid by low to middle income folks; and I also favor an increase in the tax, the income tax, paid by upper to high income folks. But I will be consistent: a tax "cut" for anybody that isn't matched by reductions in spending isn't a tax "cut" at all; it's a tax deferral. A tax deferral in a time of high unemployment and low output is okay if it's stimulative. This one is.

- rayward

February 13, 2012 at 5:39pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm with Rayward on this. We should organize our taxes by the least damaging to the economy (the payroll tax is high on the least of damaging, the top rate and the estate tax are low on the list of damaging) and organize our spending in the same fashion (unemployment benefits are high on the list for helpful, infrastructure is high, and foreign aid spent in other countries is low on the list). When the economy does well, all the problems we have get smaller. Running deficits while spending vast amounts overseas and with low taxes on capital gains and dividends has a low deficit to economic boost ratio.

- Nusholtz

February 14, 2012 at 9:13am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close