THE VINE JANUARY 30, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Before lolcats—long before, actually—there were the Chick-fil-A cows, who took agricultural reform into their own hooves with their orthographically challenged admonitions to “EAT MOR CHIKIN.” And nowadays, hardly a week goes by without some new reminder that, from a climate perspective at least, those cows actually had it right. The latest issue of Scientific American has an article calculating that a pound of beef produces 13 times as many greenhouse-gas emissions as a pound of chicken. And it’s a disparity that’s not going away anytime soon, even if there was a widespread shift from feedlot-raised beef to the grass-fed kind.

That’s because confined feedlot operations, while bad for water quality, animal welfare, and human health, may not be all that much worse than grass-fed beef farms when it comes to greenhouse gases. Sure, it's fossil-fuel intensive to grow and ship all the grain that cows eat in feedlots, but when cows are eating grass, which has more fiber than grain does, they produce more methane per day (via belching, farting, and manure), and they take longer to reach slaughter weight, which gives them more days to spend producing methane. (Figuring out which of these effects predominates is, as you might expect, a matter of some contention.)
Of course, the simplest way to tackle cow-related emissions is to get people to eat less beef. Another possibility is to reduce the amount of lignin—a type of particularly indigestible fiber that causes cows to produce more methane—in the grass that cows eat. A company in Australia has developed a strain of genetically modified low-lignin grass, featured in an article over at Slate on genetically modified crops that could actually benefit the environment. Perhaps the next step will be breeding a reduced-methane cow to accompany what the Slate article calls the “enviropig,” a line of Yorkshire pigs that have been genetically altered to produce less phosphorous in their manure. Or, again, we could just eat less beef. It would make the Chick-fil-A cows happy.
--Rob Inglis
6 comments
Nutritionally, too, chicken breast goes a lot longer in providing good proteins than does steak.
But, let's say there's a sea change in consumer demand over to chicken... then we end up having to account for the means of feeding/slaughtering/shipping chicken, which if my memory serves me right, involves corn. Do the benefits outweigh the negatives here?
- dylanposer
January 30, 2009 at 4:29pm
Most of the chikcen sold and consumed in this country is watery garbage filled with so much saline injection as to be practically inedible by anyone with a smattering of taste. I'll stick with the real meat, thanks. Prime and lamb.
Eat less, eat better. TM
- teplukhin2you
January 30, 2009 at 5:23pm
Is there any particular reason why human beings do not, in general, eat each other?
Seems to me it would be a good way to get rid of a lot of dead people. According to the UN, about 62 million people die every year. That's a lot of ribeyes.
In fact, I consider it immoral that we do not eat our dead. Doing so would would end the contribution to global warming from cremation. It would save untold square miles of arable land wasted on burials. And it would eliminate the need to eat a hell of a lot of beef, chicken, lamb, pork, whatever.
Hell, if you're squeamish about eating Aunt Minnie after she passes on, at least have the decency to grind her (and the rest of us) up into dog food. Dogs won't give a shit.
- williamyard
January 30, 2009 at 9:23pm
I see Jonathan Swift has joined Talkback.
- cspencef
January 31, 2009 at 10:55pm
"Hell, if you're squeamish about eating Aunt Minnie after she passes on, at least have the decency to grind her (and the rest of us) up into dog food. Dogs won't give a shit."
No, feed her to the pigs, because they will eat it all, bones included. Or to the chickens for that matter.
- cekestner
February 1, 2009 at 1:52am
Many of you are probably regular readers, but to those who aren't, I want to put in a little unprompted
- Anonymous
February 2, 2009 at 1:53pm