SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Don't Have A Cow

THE VINE JANUARY 30, 2009

Don't Have A Cow

Before lolcats—long before, actually—there were the Chick-fil-A cows, who took agricultural reform into their own hooves with their orthographically challenged admonitions to “EAT MOR CHIKIN.” And nowadays, hardly a week goes by without some new reminder that, from a climate perspective at least, those cows actually had it right. The latest issue of Scientific American has an article calculating that a pound of beef produces 13 times as many greenhouse-gas emissions as a pound of chicken. And it’s a disparity that’s not going away anytime soon, even if there was a widespread shift from feedlot-raised beef to the grass-fed kind.

That’s because confined feedlot operations, while bad for water quality, animal welfare, and human health, may not be all that much worse than grass-fed beef farms when it comes to greenhouse gases. Sure, it's fossil-fuel intensive to grow and ship all the grain that cows eat in feedlots, but when cows are eating grass, which has more fiber than grain does, they produce more methane per day (via belching, farting, and manure), and they take longer to reach slaughter weight, which gives them more days to spend producing methane. (Figuring out which of these effects predominates is, as you might expect, a matter of some contention.)

Of course, the simplest way to tackle cow-related emissions is to get people to eat less beef. Another possibility is to reduce the amount of lignin—a type of particularly indigestible fiber that causes cows to produce more methane—in the grass that cows eat. A company in Australia has developed a strain of genetically modified low-lignin grass, featured in an article over at Slate on genetically modified crops that could actually benefit the environment. Perhaps the next step will be breeding a reduced-methane cow to accompany what the Slate article calls the “enviropig,” a line of Yorkshire pigs that have been genetically altered to produce less phosphorous in their manure. Or, again, we could just eat less beef. It would make the Chick-fil-A cows happy.

--Rob Inglis

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

Nutritionally, too, chicken breast goes a lot longer in providing good proteins than does steak.

But, let's say there's a sea change in consumer demand over to chicken... then we end up having to account for the means of feeding/slaughtering/shipping chicken, which if my memory serves me right, involves corn.  Do the benefits outweigh the negatives here?  

- dylanposer

January 30, 2009 at 4:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Most of the chikcen sold and consumed in this country is watery garbage filled with so much saline injection as to be practically inedible by anyone with a smattering of taste. I'll stick with the real meat, thanks. Prime and lamb.

Eat less, eat better. TM

- teplukhin2you

January 30, 2009 at 5:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Is there any particular reason why human beings do not, in general, eat each other?

Seems to me it would be a good way to get rid of a lot of dead people. According to the UN, about 62 million people die every year. That's a lot of ribeyes.

In fact, I consider it immoral that we do not eat our dead. Doing so would would end the contribution to global warming from cremation. It would save untold square miles of arable land wasted on burials. And it would eliminate the need to eat a hell of a lot of beef, chicken, lamb, pork, whatever.

Hell, if you're squeamish about eating Aunt Minnie after she passes on, at least have the decency to grind her (and the rest of us) up into dog food. Dogs won't give a shit.

- williamyard

January 30, 2009 at 9:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I see Jonathan Swift has joined Talkback.

- cspencef

January 31, 2009 at 10:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Hell, if you're squeamish about eating Aunt Minnie after she passes on, at least have the decency to grind her (and the rest of us) up into dog food. Dogs won't give a shit."

No, feed her to the pigs, because they will eat it all, bones included. Or to the chickens for that matter.

- cekestner

February 1, 2009 at 1:52am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Many of you are probably regular readers, but to those who aren't, I want to put in a little unprompted

- Anonymous

February 2, 2009 at 1:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close