NOVEMBER 9, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Tuesday night’s election results may not have been good for Republicans, but they were very good for Fox. CNN, riding a tide of normally-cable-avoidant viewers, won the evening, technically, but Fox came in a close ratings second and won YouTube—thanks, mostly, to the surreal moment in which Karl Rove questioned the station’s own number-crunchers. But the true star of the night was anchor Megyn Kelly, who, upon being presented with Rove’s fanciful doubts about ballot-counting, marched down to the bowels of Fox Election Night HQ for a full, on-air accounting of their methodology. One network executive explained to New York’s Gabriel Sherman that the segment was at least in part a matter of framing. “This is Fox News, so anytime there’s a chance to show off Megyn Kelly’s legs they’ll go for it.”
The insider had the wrong read on the shot, though: Hitchcock blonde she might be, but Kelly is no passive supporting actress. The heat of the segment came not from Kelly’s gams, but from her willingness—not for the first time that night—to seize control of what was an embarrassing situation, and turn it into compelling television. Kelly hasn’t just succeeded at her job for being smart and telegenic (though she’s both), she’s done well because she cares more about what’s good for Fox than what’s good for the Republican party. The two fates aren’t as closely aligned as many at the network seemed to think the other night.
Kelly, who is 41 and the mother of two, has risen quickly at Fox News since she quit her Big Law job in her mid-30s to pursue the career that a high school aptitude test hadpredicted she’d shine at. “I am more interesting than this. I am more interested than this,” she wrote in her diary before deciding to ditch the brief-and-briefcase track. It’s not the only time she’s let the media in on her journaling habit, one that suggests a woman who isn’t always as self-assured as her exterior might suggest. And yet perfectness, or a simulacrum thereof, has been one of the hurdles she’s had to overcome in her broadcast career. After she’d been at Fox for a while, she told the Daily Beast, that she “slowly came to grips with the notion that my bravado was having the opposite effect than I intended. When a woman in the Washington bureau reduced me to tears—which, believe me, doesn’t happen often—Brit [Hume] told me my problem was that I projected zero vulnerability.”
It’s a lesson Kelly seemed to have internalized, and was very much on display on Tuesday night. As Rove ran through a barrage of stats, she asked him to repeat himself, since her ‘lil blonde self just wasn’t great with numbers. The effect was that he did so for the viewers at home, who might actually have needed him to slow down: Kelly knows when ignorance is a smart broadcast decision. When she was asked on election night to take a turn at filling in an imaginary electoral map, full of ways the vote count might break for Romney in the unlikely case of the Cuyahoga River turning from water to wine and other miracles raining down from heaven, she faux-ditzily demurred for a moment, pretending as if she didn’t know how to work the equipment. Clearly, she was devoting her spare mental-arithmetic to imagining precisely how bad participating in Fox’s numerical magical thinking would make her look.
Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.
Kelly rarely truly plays the ingénue, though. She was the first to quickly and sharply sound the alarm last summer when Fox (among other networks) erroneously interpreted the Supreme Court’s decision on health care. Election night, she interrupted Rove as he began one of his flights of speculation early on in the evening. “Is this just math that you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better or is this real?" She was anchoring, not cheerleading.
Of course, Kelly rose to prominence for saying the kinds of things that make liberal Fox viewers (not quite so dodo-rare as you might think—anyone who watches “The Daily Show” ends up with more than a working knowledge of Fox) scream, “Is this real?” She famously referred to the pepper spray that police used on Occupy Wall Streeters as just a “food product.” She waged a war against the New Black Panther party so prolonged that even fellow Fox contributors found it unseemly. And she is a master of turning straight news into something a little more skewed, simply by the insertion of a disgusted note into her voice (try it at home on a word like, say, entitlements).
Kelly gets under Jon Stewart’s skin in a very particular way, perhaps because she combines the classic Fox anchorbabe aura with what is clearly a commanding intelligence. She should know better, you can imagine him thinking. She must know better. On the first “Daily Show” after her interrogation of Rove’s sense of reality, Stewart, playing the clip repeatedly, triumphantly shouted that it was “like when Truman Burbank first suspected the world he’d been living in was not what it seemed.”
The two tangled most prominently over maternity leave; after she’d taken hers, she became a newfound champion of gender equality in the Family and Medical Leave Act. (Incidentally, Kelly refuses to call herself a feminist, on the usual right-wing grounds that she’s not shrill or unfeminine.) Stewart called her out for hypocrisy and self-interestedness. He was right, but he was missing the point.
“It’s not political,” she told GQ of her decisions about what to cover. “Television is a service, but it's also a business. And in choosing what you’re going to put on your program, you have to figure out what’s going to appeal to your audience and what’s going to rate.” In the same interview, she carefully managed to distance herself from Glenn Beck (then her colleague at the network) without disavowing him entirely, and to condemn birtherism without condemning birthers (“I don’t want to judge anybody.”) The flexibility is the key to Kelly’s worldview. “I’m a soulless lawyer,” Kelly told The Daily Beast. “Give me any opinion and I can argue it.” Megyn Kelly is interested in preserving the Fox brand over the GOP brand, yes, but she is, most of all, interested in preserving the Megyn Kelly brand. It’s the difference between Kelly and, say, fellow Fox blonde Gretchen Carlson or even Rove himself. She controls the spin, the spin doesn’t control her.
25 comments
blech...I have seen far too much of her to have any respect for her. Shep Smith is the only anchor who I find worth a damn on that network. It isn't the viewpoint I find objectionable (Smith is likely a very strong libertarian, at least that is how he strikes me as being) it is the sneering look and her voice on issue after issue. If you said Smith could save Fox I would agree, not her.
- blackton
November 9, 2012 at 12:48am
I switched to Fox about the time of the Rovhio moment, to read the congressional contests on the bottom banner, but Rove caught my attention. Once you've watched election returns, you know that in a close enough contest, you have to know where the votes are yet to be reported from. Since Barone (who had elsewhere made his own prediction of a 315 EV win for Romney) was in the 'tech room', and he has every precinct in America in his mental maps, I had fun watching the injection of some drama. A very satisfactory resolution when it was revealed that Boehner's home county had reported, accounting for the sudden number tightening. And, I do prefer to wait until 90% have been counted when it's a state that is about to determine the EC victor - the point Rove was trying to make. But, Megyn Kelley did make some interesting points. The best one was when they showed poll workers in Cleveland, doing nothing. Megyn shut down the speculation by saying something like "They look like they have finished their jobs on a very long day." (I admit that photo WAS a dog whistle) Anyone reading this far, a disclsure: I am a "Yojimbo" newser. Based on the idea that there are four perceptions of the same event. Yours. Mine. Theirs. (bystanders) The truth.
- K2K
November 9, 2012 at 1:08am
Ms. Malone I throughly enjoyed your article about Fox and Megyn Kelly in particular. I am young and liberal so I am decidedly not in Fox News's demographic but I really enjoyed watching Fox's election night coverage. I almost feel bad for the people that watch Fox and who believed truly that Obama was going to lose. Seeing Dick Morris and Karl Rove having to struggle with the reality of Obama's victory was extremely satisfying. I agree with you Megyn Kelly is different than Dick Morris, Bill O'Reilly and Karl Rove she is conservative but she still is very much in touch with reality.
- chrisv410
November 9, 2012 at 1:09am
No, Jon Stewart isn't missing the point. She is, and you are. Lawyers have ethical duties to be loyal to their clients and protect their interests and professional obligations to present their clients' cases as effectively as they can in a tightly controlled adversarial process where the other side will be doing the same and a neutral party will ultimately decide. Journalists, on the other hand, have ethical obligations to the truth, even if they also have professional obligations to win ratings. I'm with Stewart's presumed mental musings. If you're "interesting" and "interested," and briefs and briefcases aren't for you, well then, use your gams for good, dammit.
- JakeH
November 9, 2012 at 1:43am
Megan Kelly can save Fox "News" from what? And for whom? And against whom? With a few exceptions - I agree with Blackton that Shep Smith is ok - the network is little more than an televised diatribe. For the most part, Kelly is part and parcel of that propaganda.
- Thunderroad
November 9, 2012 at 2:15am
I like that a "soulless lawyer" is Fox's best hope for being saved, whatever that means. Mind you, I'm not ridiculing the article, just the headline.
- arock28
November 9, 2012 at 6:33am
"And in choosing what you're going to put on your program, you have to figure out what's going to appeal to your audience and what's going to rate.” She's Mitt Romney in drag!
- rayward
November 9, 2012 at 6:53am
"Anyone reading this far, a disclsure: I am a "Yojimbo" newser. Based on the idea that there are four perceptions of the same event. Yours. Mine. Theirs. (bystanders) The truth." K2K, You hit it. When it comes to politics, even the truth is a perception.
- magboy47.
November 9, 2012 at 11:26am
"Rashomon," maybe?
- mldarby
November 9, 2012 at 11:46am
Not Yojimbo. You mean Rashomon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashomon_effect
- mrheckman
November 9, 2012 at 11:47am
Whatever. Seems like the author just wanted to write something nice about a Fox News anchorbot and Kelly's recent prominence provided the excuse. She's no better or worse than the rest of them, apart from her appearance, which is stunning. But even a pretty woman gets tiresome after a while when most of what's coming out of her mouth is unmitigated BS. Sorry, no sale.
- DC Spence
November 9, 2012 at 12:13pm
thank you for the correction. I no longer double check my hazy memories from the 1970's :) Yes, I meant Rashomon. The Rashomon effect is certainly visible in our political 'discourse'. One reason, if I can handle what passes for "news" on tv, that I channel flip between CNN and Fox when Bloomberg Business News gets boring. So many tnr.com commenters attack me for trying to figure out who is saying what from both sides. btw, Erin Burnett might just save CNN. Fox does not need saving, except in the minds of those who watch MSNBC. It is not that difficult to know when it is news, or opinion, yet so many think opinion IS the news. Why else cite Krugman or Friedman of the NYT? They write opinions. I just read the NYT take on Rove's Ohio moment. Might have created a fifth version of the "truth": filtering everything through the lens of BushDerangementSyndrome for all eternity.
- K2K
November 9, 2012 at 2:22pm
“Is this just math that you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better or is this real?" was the best thing of the evening
- subterra
November 9, 2012 at 2:28pm
Why would anybody want to save FOX "News?" The best thing that could happen to America is if this purveyor of lies would go off the air. Add to that the openly race-baiting, anti-woman Rush Limbaugh, who's been preaching sheer hate in case anybody hasn't been listening - how can we forget that this kind of propaganda - lies combined with hate - is extremely dangerous? That said, the confrontation between FOX Blondy and Rove was hilarious. She really nailed it - is this real math or just math to make you feel good as a Republican. Hallelujah. Good for her. I honestly can't believe these guys weren't reading Nate Silver and other pollsters and were actually surprised when they lost. And, here's the thing to those making excuses for Rove: we didn't even need Ohio. In the end we even got Florida. Then Rove turns around and blames Obama for voter suppression. See, this is insane. As for those voters who stood in line: heroes. By the way this is a scandal.
- Sophia
November 9, 2012 at 3:30pm
"Then Rove turns around and blames Obama for voter suppression." Sophia, Rove has been blaming the Democrats for voter suppression since he became the Architect of the Bush family in the Eighties. It fits with his philosophy--attack the enemy in its strongest area. And the Dems' strongest area is voter turnout.
- magboy47.
November 9, 2012 at 5:10pm
I had the exact same reaction as Noreen, and Noreen expresses the correct amount of skepticism, and provides what I think is the correct lens through which to via Kelly's work. So, nice piece Noreen, I pretty much agree with your take.
- jet
November 9, 2012 at 8:22pm
I disagree with this article entirely, except for the observation about Megyn's legs being hot. Rove did not have a "meltdown" as some drama queens wish, he simply questioned the call. I don't see what the big deal is.
- Nicomachus
November 9, 2012 at 9:58pm
"Rashomon" was based on a Japanese story from the 1920s that was in turn strongly influenced by Ambrose Bierce's short story "The Midnight Road."
- ironyroad
November 11, 2012 at 12:56am
Rove had a mega-meltdown. And no wonder--he spent untold millions on campaigns, eleven out of twelve of which (and 100% of Crossroads GPS' buys) failed. He represents a capsule representation of another case of the danger of believing your own bullshit. Or hubris in Greek.
- Robert Powell
November 11, 2012 at 2:33pm
Thanks for the Ambrose Bierce plug irony. Right up there with Mark Twain IMHO.
- Robert Powell
November 11, 2012 at 2:35pm
thanks irony. I thought Bierce was heavily influenced by all things Japanese. Chicken & egg... Enough about Rove. Grover Norquist is MIA. And, I am not so sure his replacement will ever be so powerful again.
- K2K
November 11, 2012 at 8:23pm
thanks irony. I thought Bierce was heavily influenced by all things Japanese. Chicken & egg... Enough about Rove. Grover Norquist is MIA. And, I am not so sure his replacement will ever be so powerful again.
- K2K
November 11, 2012 at 8:23pm
Oops! I was thinking of Lafcadio Hearn being 'heavily influenced by all things Japanese'. Never really studied American fiction, so I apologize to irony, RP, and Ambrose Bierce :)
- K2K
November 11, 2012 at 11:08pm
One always discovers Bierce fans in unexpected places. If anyone would like, take a glance at this site http://www.ambrosebierce.org/main.html I don't normally self-advertize on TNR but the 2006 issue of the online journal has my short piece on The Midnight Road. Lots of other interesting stuff there too.
- ironyroad
November 12, 2012 at 12:20pm
Thanks irony. Great treasure.
- Robert Powell
November 12, 2012 at 4:16pm