GENDER MARCH 19, 2013
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
The day after Hurricane Sandy, my husband had cabin fever and was desperate to go for a walk. We had been trapped in our apartment for 36 hours. Here was the rub. His father was about to come over, and our living room was strewn with shut-in detritus: magazines, beef jerky wrappers, and empty soup cans. Even though I was eight months pregnant, I insisted we tidy up. My husband argued that his dad didn’t care if our place was a bit messy, but it’s really hard to fight with a massively pregnant person who is hanging up jackets and washing dishes.
When it comes to housecleaning, my basically modern, egalitarian marriage starts looking more like the backdrop to an Updike short story. My husband and I both work. We split midnight baby feedings. My husband would tell you that he does his fair share of the housework, but if pressed, he will admit that he’s never cleaned the bathroom, that I do the dishes nine times out of ten, and that he barely knows how the washer and dryer work in the apartment we’ve lived in for over eight months. Sure, he changes the light bulbs and assembles the Ikea furniture, but he’s never scrubbed a toilet in the six years we’ve lived together.
This is not just our issue. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, about 55 percent of American mothers employed full time do some housework on an average day, while only 18 percent of employed fathers do. Even if you control for the fact that moms with full-time jobs tend to work fewer hours than dads with full time jobs (as studies have), working women with children are still doing a week and a half more of “second shift” work each year than their male partners.1
Even in the famously gender-neutral Sweden, women do 45 minutes more housework a day than their male partners.
Furthermore, when you look at the granular data from time-use studies, the housework men actually do is both more gendered and less frequent than the housework women do. Fathers do slightly more lawn care than moms—11 percent of working dads are out mowing the lawn on an average day compared to 6.4 percent of working moms. So that means dads are out clipping the hedges on sunny Saturdays, while moms are the ones doing the drudgery of vacuuming day in and day out. And this isn’t solely an American phenomenon. Even in the famously gender-neutral Sweden, women do 45 minutes more housework a day than their male partners.
To be fair, men do far more cleaning now than they did in the Eisenhower era. But when you look at the advances women have made in getting men to share other domestics tasks—childcare, cooking—cleaning is still very much women’s work (though it’s worth noting that men still don’t do as much childcare and cooking as women do). The fact that it’s more than OK—cool even—for men to take on pretty much any domestic tasks but cleaning is everywhere in the wider culture. Louis C.K., one of the most popular stand-ups in the country, has constructed his entire identity around fatherhood and is still seen as masculine and hilarious. Ben Affleck is photographed carting his two daughters around a Los Angeles farmers market and the world swoons. There is a new magazine called Kindling Quarterly that looks like an Anthropologie catalog and bills itself as an “exploration of fatherhood.” Anthony Bourdain, Momofuku’s David Chang, and the Voltaggio brothers of "Top Chef" fame have made cooking synonymous with trash mouths and tattoos. Men with brawny arms host butchering classes in Middle America and Popular Mechanics has written a beginners guide to brewing beer.
Which is all to say, it’s seen as socially admirable and masculine for a man to be on diaper duty or to sous-vide a steak, but there are no closet organizing tips in the pages of Esquire, no dishwasher detergent ads in the pages of GQ. Considering the strides that have been made in getting men to share the labor in other traditionally female domestic areas, why has cleaning remained the final frontier?
At its most basic, a reason why a lot of men don’t want to clean is obvious: it’s not fun. The rewards of the other two traditionally female household tasks—childcare and cooking—are palpable. Your kid’s smile, a delicious meal. But not so with cleaning. Drew Magary, a Deadspin columnist and the author of the forthcoming parenting memoir Someone Could Get Hurt, says that men will never take the initiative and clean without being asked “because it sucks.” Indeed, when sociologists Judith Treas and Tsui-o Tai looked at household task hierarchies among men in 32 different countries, they found that men all over the world will forego laundry over all other traditionally female tasks—they’re much more likely to care for a sick spouse or child or go grocery shopping.
But this is only a very partial explanation. Disaggregating all the factors that go into making women more inclined to clean than men is a headachey, complex, chicken-egg, nature-nurture project. But looking at some of the practical reasons and the theories behind this disparity might just give us some of the tools to shift it.
To start, nearly all of the ads for cleaning products feature women and are designed to appeal to women. According to a 2008 study from the University of New Hampshire, only about 2 percent of commercials featuring men showed them doing domestic tasks. Even Tide, which has recently featured a stay-at-home dad in a few commercials, uses ads that emphasize the dad part rather than the cleaning part--like this one, where a father is sweetly washing his daughter’s favorite princess dress. Ads like that, according to P&G North America Fabric Care Brand Manager, Matthew Krehbiel, are meant to appeal to the 17 percent of men who are the primary grocery shoppers and launderers. But that’s a small slice of the overall market, and so it makes sense that it’s not the marketer’s priority. This aspect of cultural messaging is a self-perpetuating tautology: The vast majority of detergent purchasers are women, and so marketers feature more women in the ads.
Only about 2 percent of commercials featuring men showed them doing domestic tasks.
In a phone interview, Arlie Hochschild, the author of The Outsourced Self and the foundational feminist text on women and housework, The Second Shift, makes the argument that a women’s desire for a clean home has deeper origins than just marketing. Cleaning, Hoschild says, is not simply physical work. It’s emotional work. “Letting the house go is in a way letting something deeper go. … You get a sense of safety in an orderly home,” Hochschild says.
But assuming both parties care about creating a sense of safety in the home, why does it fall to women? I suspect that women are more driven to keep a clean house because they know they—before their male partners—will be judged for having a dirty one. When I lived with two female roommates, I was much more of a slob. None of us was particularly responsible for the emotional tone of that apartment—no single one of us was more likely to be shunned for the state of our bathroom. But when I got married, the dust bunnies hopping across our floor started seeming like a personal affront. Although it was my husband’s father coming over, I was the one who insisted we clean. I was worried I would be judged for the beef jerky wrappers (on both aesthetic and gustatory grounds), despite the fact that my father-in-law has never once made a peep about the state of our abode. Somewhere lodged within me was the message that it was my responsibility.
Unfortunately, the notion that women will be the first to be judged for a messy home and the first to be commended for an orderly one isn’t much of an incentive for men to pick up a mop. In the instances in which men actually do the majority of the housework in their partnership, women are still the ones getting credit. David Michael Perez, the publisher and editor of Kindling Quarterly, says that though he does more decorating and cleaning than his spouse does, “often when people say ‘your house is nice,’ it’s directed more at my wife.” If they’re not even going to be rewarded for it, why bother at all?
With all these obstacles to real gender parity of chores, what’s a working woman to do? Philosophy professor Alexandra Bradner suggests on the Atlantic’s website that couples sit down with a list of questions like, “Do I do half of the laundry and half of the dishes every day?” to figure out where they’re slacking off in comparison to their mate. This sounds exhausting and impractical. If I do one load of laundry, it’s easier for me to do the second rather than wait for my husband to mosey over. (Bradner also says that when men do traditionally female chores, they’re enacting “‘small instances of gender heroism,’ or ‘SIGH’s”—which, barf.)
I’m much more inclined to take the advice of Jenny Anderson, the co-author of It’s Not You, It’s the Dishes, which applies economic theory to household tasks. A lot of women shoo their husbands away from cleaning because they know the men will do a sub-par job of scrubbing the sink. Anderson says you should divide up tasks according to the economic theory of comparative advantage. Let’s say a woman is twice as good as her husband at doing the laundry, but only 20 percent better than her husband at doing the dishes. In that couple, the husband should always do the dishes. What’s more, he’ll get better at it through repetition.
Another solution is for women to lower their filth thresholds. Did I really need to clean up the house for my father-in-law? Would he have cared if there were a few glasses sitting out on the kitchen table? Probably not. But it’s harder to stomach this fix once you have children, when the threat of a Fisher Price plastic hell-scape is perpetually around the corner. One of the women I interviewed for this piece, who doesn’t want to publicly shame her husband, said that when she came home after a weekday night out, it was so messy that it looked like she had 40 kids instead of two. If she had left the living room like that, it wouldn’t have been very good hygiene modeling for her kids (and, at some point, might get social services called).
One last suggestion comes from Magary, who so emphatically declared that cleaning sucks: make cleaning more fun. He says that when the Swiffer first came on the market, it was sort of enticing. (Swiffer reps said they had no information to share with me about men and cleaning.) “We like gadgets and stuff,” Magary explains. “If there was some new electronic hovering Apple product that cleaned the bathroom, I’d try it.” Are you listening out there in Cupertino? You have a huge, untapped market on your hands for toilet-scrubbing iPods. I bet my husband would buy one.
11 comments
You can get men to clean but you can't get them to care. Women don't want to clean either but they want the place to be clean. They care if the place is clean--men not so much. Is it fair to ask men to care? How do you get them to care? If we could figure out how to get men to care ...I don't think we can and I don't know that we should. Why ask them to carry a burden (this caring) that they themselves don't have! Cause it annoys us that they don't care...
- jillweiss
March 19, 2013 at 11:05am
I think the skills men and women bring to a relationship or marriage are learned early on. Regardless of sex. My wife is what I call a "neat" slob. Something that she learned early on as a kid with a maid to clean up after her. When she unpacks or gets home from work, the house looks like a suitcase bomb went off with clothes and shoes dropped into little piles in every room. She leaves piles of her stuff around the house for days until the weekend when she throws her arms up in disgust and puts on the "look how dirty the house is" routine. Meanwhile, if I do the laundry and fold her clothes, they stay piled on the dresser, in the basket, or on her side of the bed (where she then moves them to the existing pile on the dresser) until later in the week to put away. Of course, I'm a neat freak but that goes with my nature. I hate visual messes and try to keep a clean house. And we pretty much take turns with the chores. Alternating weeks to grocery shop and cook dinners (the other, in theory washes the dishes but she lags on that task often as well) but it keeps both of us from dreading the task too much. And cleaning is pretty much equal. There are times when I decide to clean top to bottom while she does yard work or vice versa. If I'm working on the outside of house, she cleans the inside. Of course when she complains about cleaning the shower, I offer up the task of cleaning out the gutters or pruning the trees or working on the renovation. And she goes about her tasks. Of course if I linger in my "to do list" activities I'm not working hard enough, while she is busy redoing her nails for the 4th time that week, in between loads of laundry or dusting. I would suggest one way of dealing with a messy roommate. Simply pile up their stuff (dirty clothes, dishes, whatnot, in their bedroom or on their side of the bed) and clean up only after yourself. At some point they're going to get the point of participating equitable tasks.
- singlspeed
March 19, 2013 at 12:15pm
A modest proposal: we (busy urban Americans) have outsourced almost all of our auto care, baking, day care, and various other sundry tasks that consumed much of an Eisenhower-era couple's maintenance schedule to paid professionals. Why not add a cleaning service to the list, to handle the tasks that are far more unpleasant than baking? As a single guy with no ego attached to the care and maintenance of my abode, I determined years ago that I could never be persuaded to care enough about dusting, mopping, and cleaning the bathroom to convince myself to do it often enough to achieve even a basic level of cleanliness. So I hired a maid service, and for $75.00 every third Monday, a team of professionals whisk in and out of my apartment in half an hour and leave things sparkling. Sure, couples with children have bigger houses and many also have tighter budgets. But $1300 a year is a lot cheaper than a divorce because you're married to a guy whose feminist card doesn't include doing windows.
- austinexpat
March 19, 2013 at 12:40pm
As a single-father upon whom all domestic chores of all kinds and classes fall, I have a few remarks ... (1) while doing lip service to lawn duty, this article still appears to fail - as does EVERY SINGLE ARTICLE on this subject that I have every had the opportunity to read, it fails to address other "gendered" chores such as auto or home mechanics ... or even failing that, fluency in auto or home mechanics so that we put in only a battery when the mechanic is recommending a new alternator, (2) priority. Concerning the priority the author alludes to it towards the end, but this is a fairly big deal, maybe a big enough deal to question whether chores is a "frontier" of any kind for the women's movement rather than a largely intra and interpersonal issue. Example: I consider myself responsible for four things - importantly, our institutionalized family courts would appear to agree with me: (1) financial upkeep of my own household (2) financial upkeep of my ex-wife's household (3) financial rectification of the disaster of the divorce and (4) financial future, particularly my children's college education and my retirement. That's a lot of industry on one man's plate, and last I checked, no one on these pages, the Prospect or the Atlantic was showing any sympathy. I try hard, very hard, to keep a clean home while prioritizing direct parenting of my children. After financing everyone, being a present and involved parent, frankly folding laundry? ... that is a task that gets a very short stick.
- dcwood10
March 19, 2013 at 3:59pm
3,19,13, 4:35 pm est//// DCWood10 I’m a fading/phasing-out Toronto family law lawyer so I read with interest and some sympathy your comment. As you’re a single father I infer that you have custody of your kids. Most access fathers don’t speak in these terms. But my inference could be wrong. Or it may be the case that you have some kind of shared approaching 50/50 custody arrangement with your ex wife in which case speaking of being a single father can ring right to me. If it’s that you have custody of your kids, I’d be curious why you have financial responsibility for your ex-wife’s household. There could circumstances under which a custodial parent has to pay spousal support or for a variety of reason is stuck with obligations for ex spouse’s debts. But these, especially the former, are fairly atypical in my experience. None of this, of course, is any of my business and I’m not looking for any answers from you nor, equally of course, not in any way purporting to give you any advice. Just saying what immediately and generally stuck me from your comments./// As to what i read of your main beef with this thoughtful and engaging piece, I think your criticism is wide of the mark. Grose’s context is living-together couples both, I presume, working, with or without kids, but the case is even more punctuated if there are kids. And her brunt is the sheer disparity in housework as between the sexes, its unfairness and trying to get some purchase on the reasons why. And I think the very thing you think is too trivial, the division of domestic chores, while not a “final frontier,” as the tease has it, is no less important for the fact of its prosaicity. The assumed burden of cleaning, given busy lives filled with work and children, is burdensome indeed and the disparity ought be remediated, mostly probably by some intra-couple “consciousness-raising.” I’m not sure your understandable burdens as a single parent tell as against this issue, most respectfully.
- basman
March 19, 2013 at 4:39pm
SHOW 1 RESPONSE
basman, replies ... on paper 50/50, in practice never worked out that way, I knew it never would, in your position you can probably readily appreciate the forces lined against me to make me take the burden to prove my "never would work out that way" contention up front, rather than in retrospect. I agreed to a period of spousal support. If we recomputed child support today the finding would not be the same trajectory. I don't see myself opening that door though. To off the mark on the authors standpoint on division of housework ... I see your point but l think some angling is worthwhile. For one: to me these types of articles (division of housework as an issue of generalizable, inter-gender relations) is a matter that chafes. That is so because when I was married, it was not at all like that. I do not think my ex can come close to claiming a majority of housework. When I see people come up with aggregated data that would seem to suggest this is an issue, I am skeptical. At aggregates we get differences like 60:40. There is a lot of subjectivity and chips on shoulders and very personal matters in 60:40. To be a public affair and a genuine public problem, I think we can ask for a larger difference. Also - I'm just skeptical. Up close, the anecdotes of people I know, don't add up like that. Subjectively each spouse is quite sure of him or herself, from outside, the abuse doesn't seem so clear. Let me suggest it this way: division of household chores IS an issue between married people, probably almost all of them, and an issue of interest TO them, I appreciate that. What I raise object to is that this is an issue of feminism. I think it is at least worth asking if this universal matter of coupling is really a legitimate issue of gender and if treating it as an issue of gender even serves to trivialize other very real matters. My point about priority, in that respect, I think is relevant, even though I am divorced. The point is: it isn't necessarily that this is the drudgeriest (made up word, yes) work ... it IS that we probably agree, in grand scheme, coupled or single, it is the lowest priority work. A spouse, male (60%?) or female (40%?) ... might opine, if he or she felt safe doing so, that their own sanity, by way of need for rest, is literally more important than house cleaning. All interesting ... a matter of public policy concern and gender equality ... I suggest: doubtful.
- dcwood10
March 19, 2013 at 5:55pm
The problem with this debate is that the only side that gets told is the side of the nagging neat-freak. People who have more sensible ideas about what level of cleanliness is necessary are entirely shut out. The author even opens with an example where she's clearly in the wrong and her husband is clearly in the right, but fails to come to the obvious conclusion. We as a society don't need to coerce men (or anyone) to waste more time with superficial house-grooming, we need to get women (and any men who happen to also be neat freaks) to waste less time with it. Or, if they really want to spend their time that way, they need to adopt less of an attitude of self-righteousness about it and realize that their hobby is no better than watching the boob tube or doing a crossword puzzle.
- Simon Greenwood
March 19, 2013 at 8:15pm
I don't know, she talked about food wrappers and old cans of soup. That's pretty gross, and I'm no neat freak.
- polcereal
March 25, 2013 at 4:24pm
SHOW 1 RESPONSE
3,19, 13, 10:20 pm, est//// "Neat freaks"! Are you kidding me? Try raising a few kids and tell me about neat freaks!
- basman
March 19, 2013 at 10:20pm
I thought that's why my parents had my sister and I. So that they had some live-in house-keepers. Imagine my parent's pride when her daughter and son were old enough to be "excited" to help with vacuuming and doing dishes and mowing the lawn (only to be suckered into 18 years of servitude). Of course this could explain my visceral dislike of mowing the lawn as much as I hate cleaning a toilet.
- singlspeed
March 20, 2013 at 11:53am
SHOW 1 RESPONSE
The solutions offered at the end here were really small-bore. It would be better to tackle the larger issue: society's perceptions. We should try to increase men's sense of responsibility and pride in living in a clean place. I'm sure there's a cleaning company out there that would be happy to participate in a campaign designed to get men into housework (they could sell more things that way). Emphasize the technology, how women think a man cleaning up is attractive, how the man's friends would shun his company because of his disgusting habits, and how high-status it is to have a modern, sparkling entertainment room. Show a father teaching his son to be responsible for cleaning his own room. That would be a feminist project--not this advice about interpersonal strategics.
- polcereal
March 25, 2013 at 4:41pm