SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?

POLITICS MARCH 19, 2011

Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?

Over the next few months, the dedicated Reagan fan will have numerous opportunities to celebrate the fortieth president. There are tributes at a NASCAR race in California in late March and at Chicago’s Wrigley Field in early August. The Gipper’s hometown— Dixon, Illinois—will host a “Dutch” ice cream social in September; Washington will throw a gala in May, and London will unveil a statue on July 4. The occasion, of course, is that 2011 is the one-hundredth anniversary of Reagan’s birth.

Recently, I attended one of these gatherings: a 17-hour birthday bash for the Gipper at the Rope Walk Tavern in Baltimore, a handsome brick building in the gentrifying enclave of Federal Hill. Baltimore may seem like an unlikely locale for such an event—the city hasn’t elected a Republican mayor in 44 years—but that didn't deter one of the bar’s owners, Marc McFaul. By mid-morning, cars lined up in the parking deck, featuring bumper stickers like “What Would Reagan Do?” and “America needs Ronald Reagan now more than ever.” Inside, the tavern featured three murals of the late president, two Reagan busts, and two life-size bronze statues imported from Thailand.  

To anyone who lives in Washington, it can seem like every year is Reagan’s special year—conservative think tanks and politicians constantly invoke his name. But the many events occurring around the country this year had made me curious about a different type of fan: regular people who just really, really love Reagan. I hoped that, at the Rope Walk Tavern, I could figure out why.

 

Marc McFaul is 39, with black, gelled hair and a boyish face. The owner of the Role Walk Tavern told me that, over the years, he has made many Reagan-related pilgrimages—to the Reagan Library, the Reagan Ranch, the Reagan aircraft—and has hosted dozens of Republican fundraisers at his bar. When he got married ten years ago, the priest closed the mass by saying, “With God—and Ronald Reagan—among us.” And, for 16 years, he has thrown Reagan birthday parties, to honor his bar’s “patron saint.” A few years ago, McFaul’s daughter Sami, who is now six, was disappointed to learn that Reagan himself would not be attending the party. In the car on the way to the event, her mother had to explain that Reagan had died. This greatly troubled Sami during the cake-lighting ceremony—surely the assembled adults were unaware of their mistake. In the middle of McFaul’s speech, she blurted out, “Daddy! Reagan’s dead!” McFaul recalled, “I looked her right in the face, and said, ‘You need to know this now: Your daddy’s crazy.’”  

Still, the roots of McFaul’s Reagan mania are a bit of a mystery, even to those who know him best. After all, he was just nine when Reagan made it to the Oval Office, and McFaul never actually voted for the Gipper. “We were conservative, but I really don’t know how Marc got to be how he is,” said Carolyn McFaul, Marc’s mother, who was wearing an orange sweatshirt screen-printed with Reagan’s face. “He gets fanatical about things,” was his older sister Christy’s take.

When I put the question directly to McFaul, his answer was oddly unsatisfying—he admires Reagan’s integrity and humor, that he was a good guy, he said. As the bar filled up, I asked some of the other patrons about why they were there, and their answers, too, were often generic. “He was a man’s man.” “He knew what he believed in.” “He loved America and made Americans proud to be Americans.” No one mentioned his policies.

Patricia Brady, a kindergarten teacher from Washington, recounted standing in line all night to walk past Reagan’s casket in the Capitol Rotunda, which she called “absolutely one of the greatest experiences of my life.” She added, “I’m 60 years old, and I’m looking at this”— she gestured at the various artistic representations of Reagan around the room—“I mean, I have tears in my eyes, and I haven’t had enough beers yet for it to just be that.” “You didn’t know if it was Hollywood, or just his poise when he spoke,” Laura Gurczynski, another patron, explained. “But you just felt safe.”  

In his book How Brands Become Icons, former Oxford marketing professor Doug Holt theorizes that Reagan partly achieved his mythic stature by using American frontier motifs. “He did this by acting out the characters of the Westerns of old: talking in straight-spoken language, lashing out at big government, bureaucrats, the ‘evil empire,’” Holt said in a recent e-mail conversation. “It’s no different than religion really: You need rituals to keep the meaning vested in the icon. … The ceremonies, the posters in the living room, the memorabilia all serve this function.” Holt added, “People have to work especially hard when the person is dead.”

Around 9 p.m., McFaul led a few hundred guests in a round of “Happy Birthday.” On a table sat a sheet cake—yellow, with strawberry filling, white frosting, and edible photos of Ronnie and Nancy. Guests came up to grab a slice, careful not to hack into the Gipper’s face. Making his way to the left side of the room, McFaul bellowed, “If you weren’t sure we were a Reagan bar before, I think you’ll know now!” In the end, McFaul allowed, it was possible that his obsession with Reagan wasn’t entirely rational. “You see these nutty people with housefuls of stuff—people who dress like Elvis, have Elvis toilet paper, put Elvis everywhere,” he said. “They need a life, but, then, I think, I could be one of them.” 

Tiffany Stanley is a reporter-researcher at The New Republic.

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 8 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

8 comments

There are TNR regular contributors who frequently channel their inner Reagan and aren't even aware of it. My generation views JFK somewhat similarly, although we don't celebrate his birthday, most have forgotten the date he was assassinated, and Camelot means nothing at all. The one Reagan myth that I find the most perplexing is Reagan the tax cutter. He presided over the adoption of the largest lower and middle income tax increase ever which, coupled with the Reagan invention of lower income tax rates at the top, has compressed the US effective tax rate to the point where middle and upper income folks pay essentially the same, flat rate. Yet even as the tax burden moved down, the Reagan myth as tax cutter grew. The simple explanation is that the lower and middle income tax increase was phased-in over many years, breaking the connection between Reagan who presided over it and the increasing tax withholding experienced by those lower and middle income folks over the years. To their credit, Republicans learned the most important Reagan lesson: front load the benefits, backload the costs. Democrats (sometimes I want to call them Dumbocrats), God bless them, learned the lesson backwards, clearly evident with health care reform: front load the costs, backload the benefits.

- rayward

March 19, 2011 at 9:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Reagan represents the US's retreat into fantasy and magical thinking. Sounds like Mr. McFaul throws a fun icon party though.

- Pnaut

March 19, 2011 at 1:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with Pnaut, although I don't think it was a retreat. I think it's been a forward march that has brought us where we are today with the national debt. It's the American Dream that we can cut taxes and everything will be fine. Maybe dream isn't the right word. Reckless abandon would be better.

- Nusholtz

March 19, 2011 at 3:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Those who believe Reagan cut taxes for the lower and middle income groups are indeed living in a fantasy world. It's amazing, the myth that Reagan cut taxes is so ingrained that facts to the contrary don't exist.

- rayward

March 19, 2011 at 3:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You're probably right Nusholtz, it's representative of part of the national character.

- Pnaut

March 19, 2011 at 3:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with all of the above - and would add that apparently Reagan was not even in control of his own military/intelligence apparatus to boot. However, reading the article itself with its focus on one family's outsized reverence for an overrated president, I felt as if I was reading the Roswell (GA) Beacon. In my opinion, this is more of a lifestyle piece rather than an article that belongs in TNR. Ms. Stanley writes fairly well, but I hope that if she continues to cover Reagan centennial celebrations over the next 9 months, she will consider asking some more penetrating questions.

- wamba1

March 19, 2011 at 7:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

An excellent post by Ms. Stanley. But then, I am a fan of the short story, in which the paragraph, the sentence, the clause, the word says all one needs to know. Michelle has moved on, on her own volition I do not know, but contributions by Ms. Stanley would provide much needed balance to the flock of peacocks who provide most of the posts in TNR.

- rayward

March 19, 2011 at 8:51pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think there's a simpler way to explain this phenomenon. It's the trickle-down manifestation of a condition that afflicted many of the top Republicans during and after the Reagan era: Roosevelt envy. FDR loomed over 20th-century America in a way that was deeply felt by most people alive in the middle of the century. From social programs to WWII, the image of his imprint was huge and when he died, towards the end of the war, it provoked national mourning on an unprecedented scale. The sense of Roosevelt's historical presence put conservative Republicans, a group intrinsically hostile to his policies, in a constant search for a counterweight, since simply demnouncing Roosevelt was self-defeating in the decades after his death, given the affection he commended. And that search had slim pickings. Which Republican had made such a mark on the 20th century? Hoover? Nixon? Eisenhower was not a conservative hero and for most of the country conjured up an era of dullness that was only relieved by the arrival of the Kennedys in the White House. Thus the adulation accorded Reagan: He created a "Reagan Revolution;" he won the Cold War; he made America proud, etc. This was largely a top-down campaign, best-symbolized by the rather heavy-handed movement to see that as many buildings, structures... and DC's airport, were named or renamed for him. The Reagan birthday bash is a symptom of how this has spread. But its origins are to be found in that condition that we can call Roosevelt Envy.

- sperlin@indiana.edu

March 21, 2011 at 4:49am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close