SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Mic Check

POLITICS APRIL 9, 2010

Mic Check

Norman Finkelstein has a new book out, but few people outside of radically anti-Zionist circles seem really to care about this. The Holocaust Industry, a book whose thesis is based on a deliberate and even offensive (and, allegedly, Holocaust-revisionist) underestimation of the number of Holocaust survivors, has been translated into 16 languages and is still fantastically influential. In contrast, the “recent media” section on his publisher’s website for This Time We Went Too Far, Finkelstein’s recently-published book on Israel’s December 2008 invasion of Gaza, is pretty thin. It’s been teased in all the usual places—excerpts of the book were recently posted on CounterPunch and Mondoweiss. But the book’s publication is a small event, and given Finkelstein’s monomaniacal hatred of Israel and notorious penchant for incivility (he’s famous for wrongfully accusing Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz of plagiarism), it deserves to be.

Nevertheless, Finkelstein was at the United Nations’ headquarters on Wednesday plugging his book at a UN Correspondents Association event. And while the UN did not officially sponsor the talk, it is, on some level, bad enough that it even took place at the World Body’s headquarters. Widely discredited and still unemployed three years after losing his tenure battle at DePaul, Finkelstein was able to give a talk in the same room used for UN press briefings, with two UN flags standing in the background.

The chance to speak at the UN offered Finkelstein a shot at professional rehabilitation that he simply doesn’t deserve. In January 2008, Finkelstein appeared on a Lebanese news program and declared his solidarity with the Iranian-sponsored terrorist group Hezbollah. After a startled interviewer tried explaining to him that Hezbollah’s militancy represented an extreme position in Lebanese public life, Finkelstein launched into a characteristically crude tirade on the state of Middle Eastern affairs. He lauded Hezbollah for resisting foreign occupation before getting personal: “My parents went through World War II,” he said. “Now Stalin’s regime was not exactly a bed of roses … But who didn’t support the Soviet Union when they defeated the Nazis? ... If I’m going to honor the communists during World War II, even though I probably would not have done very well under their regimes, if I’m going to honor them, I’m going to honor the Hezbollah.”

After being denied tenure from DePaul, Finkelstein could conceivably have used his martyr’s status to secure some kind of creditable academic position. But, as Finkelstein made clear in his talk at the UNCA, he has little interest in being a respected academic again. During his over hour-long talk, Finkelstein did not cite a single first-hand interview with any of the participants in last year’s conflict. It seems he did not talk to a single Israeli soldier, while an excerpt from his book finds him admiring Hamas militants from afar, rather than, you know, interviewing them. Although, to be fair, Finkelstein claimed on Wednesday that “Hamas is not a military force.”

“[The Israelis] decided they were going to restore its deterrence capacity in Gaza. They had one big problem: they knew that Hamas had no fighting force,” Finkelstein said. And, because Hamas is not, in Finkelstein’s opinion, a military force, Israel’s real motivation in Gaza must have been the slaughter of as many civilians as possible. “They decided the way to destroy their capacity was to systematically and methodically go after the civilian infrastructure and the civilian population and thereby transmit the message to the Arab world: If you mess with us, we’re not going to have a war with you; we’re going to flatten you, like we flattened Gaza.”

The question of whether Finkelstein actually believes what he’s saying—that a terrorist organization that fired over 3,200 rockets and mortar shells (which he refers to as “firecrackers and Roman candles” in the above-linked chapter) on a civilian population over the course of a single year is not a military force—is less interesting than the question of how such a pathological mindset got a speaking invitation at the UN to begin with. The invite was apparently the idea of Nizar Abboud, a reporter for Al-Alam, an Arabic-language subsidiary of state-owned Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. “I suggested to invite him, and all the UNCA people agreed,” Abboud said. Which means that the organization representing the UN press corps apparently thought that borderline paranoia and outright slander of the Jewish state was something from which their colleagues could benefit.

The two UNCA members I spoke to supported the invitation. Matthew Lee, a blogger for Innercity Press, told me that the UNCA has never shied away from controversial invites, and recalled a UNCA event that nearly came to blows after a journalist called the visiting Nigerian foreign minister a “war criminal.” And UNCA president Giampaolo Piolidefended the invitation, explaining, “The book is talking about the Goldstone report on Gaza, which is a big issue here at the UN.”

Then again, the very legitimacy of the UN is a big issue at the UN. About a month ago, I reported on a side-event at the UN’s annual Commission on the Status of Women that was co-sponsored by the delegations of Iran and Syria and included a speech from a representative of an obscure “pro-family” advocacy group based in the U.S. Finkelstein is too pathetic to be dangerous, and the UNCA hardly confers prestige or legitimacy in the same way that a major conference does. But just as the UN became a refuge for theocrats and theocrat-coddling social conservatives during a conference on women’s rights, on Wednesday, the UN became a refuge for one of the most discredited and repugnant figures in academia. In both instances, the UN was temporarily hijacked by some of the most malignant social and political forces on earth. They are small acts of self-sabotage, but discouraging ones nonetheless.

Armin Rosen is a senior at Columbia University and the Jewish Theological Seminary’s undergraduate joint program. He’s also an intern at Inter Press Service’s UN bureau.

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

"The question of whether Finkelstein actually believes what he’s saying—that a terrorist organization that fired over 3,200 rockets and mortar shells (which he refers to as “firecrackers and Roman candles” in the above-linked chapter) on a civilian population over the course of a single year is not a military force—is less interesting than the question of how such a pathological mindset got a speaking invitation at the UN to begin with. The invite was apparently the idea of Nizar Abboud, a reporter for Al-Alam, an Arabic-language subsidiary of state-owned Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. “I suggested to invite him, and all the UNCA people agreed,” Abboud said. Which means that the organization representing the UN press corps apparently thought that borderline paranoia and outright slander of the Jewish state was something from which their colleagues could benefit." On a somewhat similar incident that took place 2 years ago in British Columbia, Canadian author Terry Glavin: "British novelist Martin Amis recently confessed to being at a loss for words whenever he encounters the hysterical, "endocrinal state" that seems to befall certain people when the subject of Israel comes up in conversation. "I just don't understand it," Amis said. "I know we're supposed to be grown up about it and not fling around accusations of anti-Semitism, but I don't see any other explanation." And this got me to thinking. If it's not anti-Semitism, then what's the proper word for it?"

- noga1

April 10, 2010 at 9:54am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Link to Glavin's article: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/editorial/story.html?id=8f4a3c29-1ad4-43fc-bb49-b627feac1810&p=1

- noga1

April 10, 2010 at 9:58am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You make it seem that it is unusual for the UN to give a platform to one spouting antisemitic views. BTW, see http://bingoprof.blogspot.com/2010/04/bad-scheduling-bad-invitation.html about Finkelstein last week here in central CT.

- jaylapidus

April 11, 2010 at 12:41am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Finkelstein is too pathetic to be dangerous..." You're sure about that? I correspond with some people including Middle Easterners who think he is a hero. The propaganda in the M.E. in particular is so biased that Finkelstein is considered The Voice Of Truth and also of course a "good Jew." This goes along with other antisemitic mythology including the widely believd canard that Israel and other "bad Jews" want to destroy al Aqsa. The latter I find really shocking because it's so ridiculous but apparently it's the cause of a lot of fear and anger in the Muslim world. What's disturbing about this is the fact that literate, well-educated people believe it (and also Finkelstein.) People from KSA for example, or Iran, who write and speak decent English are obviously not idiots yet they are buying into the ugliest lies about Jews/Israel on the planet. But then the Germans were literate and well-educated too. PS I think this guy has a screw loose. But the UN has a deeper problem. What to do?

- Sophia

April 11, 2010 at 4:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Middle Easterners who think he is a hero." Here are some examples: "Now, Norman had warned me that I will not like the conclusions and he was right: I cant stand for the Gandhian methods of struggle: in fact, my reaction to the Gandhian methods of resistance as a recipe for Palestinian struggle is probably not different from Mrs. Gandhi's reaction to Mahatma's explanation to her regarding his methods of "testing" his chastity. I also bitterly oppose the two-state solution. But Norman is a special case: I am not normally tolerant of disagreements regarding Palestine, but the man has paid his dues and his services to the anti-Zionst, anti-Israeli cause have won him a special place in the struggle for Palestine. " http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2010/03/norman-finkelsteins-best-revenge.html ___________ "I have so much respect for Dr. Norman Finkelstein … and that’s not primarily because he’s articulate, outspoken or that he makes perfect sense. It’s that he makes sense, advocates peace, and highlights the atrocities of the Israelis in Palestine, when he himself is the son of two World War II concentration camps survivors." http://www.who-sane.com/2010/03/dr-norman-finkelstein-2/ Please notice the cautious way Finkel is described in order to avoid saying "The Holocaust": "World War II concentration camps survivors." ________________ "Also.. this video clip is EXCELLENT.. I suggest you view it.. another excellent piece of work by Dr Norman Finkelstein." http://bujassem.blogspot.com/2010/03/israel-and-uae-women.html

- noga1

April 11, 2010 at 5:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close