SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home A Romney in Palin Clothing: The Political Style of Kelly...

PLANK DECEMBER 6, 2012

A Romney in Palin Clothing: The Political Style of Kelly Ayotte

Recently, John McCain has been squiring an attractive brunette Republican around town, a rising political star and young mother. The two have appeared together in high-profile press conferences. She has talked a great deal about parts of the world she can’t see from her iconoclastic home state, which is where all of her political experience was located until very recently. He’s given glowing interviews about her potential for future leadership, and gone out of his way to put his decades of experience and his reputation on the line for her. “She really is a rising star in the Republican Party,” McCain said of her once. “I can see her being very seriously considered for both vice president, and certainly over time, for the presidential nomination.”

No, you have not time-traveled back to 2008. The woman in question is Kelly Ayotte, the 44-year-old New Hampshire senator elected in 2010, who has lately raised eyebrows for her sudden elevation into one of the most high-profile congressional alliances. Thanks to the upcoming retirement of Joe Lieberman, there’s an opening in the so-called Three Amigos, the (formerly) bipartisan group of self-styled foreign-policy truth-tellers. McCain, along with South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham, has adopted Ayotte just in time for their loudest campaign in recent memory, against the nomination of Susan Rice for Secretary of State because of her role in the Benghazi affair. Ayotte, in a foot-stamping move, has personally pledged to block ANY Clinton successor who doesn’t make her happy.

Ayotte represents not just a do-over for McCain in the mentoring department, but for the Republican Party as well. She is indeed a “senorita” for the amigos, in a post-election landscape in which the GOP has come to realize that it might need to redouble its efforts to build a coalition that includes more women and minorities. Ayotte can come forward, for instance, with the particular authority afforded a woman of childbearing years, to speak for the Republicans’ position on whether religious institutions should be forced to cover birth control.

“The addition of a Republican woman from New England who’s young, who’s a mom,” one senior GOP aide told Roll Call before she’d even been elected, “all of these things broaden the Republican Party’s appeal and say to different segments of the population, ‘This party has folks in it that are just like you.’” Another promised that “She will be a leading Republican woman voice in the Senate.” This bit of identity politics is useful for Republicans, and thus useful for Ayotte, who has a resume that speaks to a clear-minded careerism (law school, a prestigious clerkship, a few years at a well-paying corporate job, then her rise through the New Hampshire D.A.’s office, where she was—as any Republican woman in such a post is wont to be—Tough On Crime).  

Ayotte has another vital qualification: she is massively boring. In an era of memes and tweetable factoids, there is little to be gleaned about her personal life (beyond her husband’s unimpeachable cred as an Iraq war vet, and the mostly undiscussed fact that she is a hard-working mother). There are no gaffes, no soundbites, no silly favorite movies, no moon colonies she aches after. You want electricity? Look elsewhere, pal. Ayotte, who has been called on by the party to deliver responses to the State of the Union and to speak at the Republican National Convention, tends to get a distracting frog in her throat when she is nervous (which she appears to be in front of television audiences, but not before her peers on the floor of Senate). She speaks, during formal address, as if at half speed, a laconic space between each word that has the effect of making it seem as if she doesn’t trust the American public’s listening comprehension, or, thanks to a curious lack of inflection, occasionally as if she were a child who has recently learned to read. Her hand jabs are so perfectly timed as to be unmistakably rehearsed, her jokes ruined by her achingly eager habit of looking around for applause. (“I’m also pretty good with a snow plow” was her big punch line during her Tampa speech this August. Context doesn’t make it funnier.)

Like thorough, unbiased reporting that challenges your way of thinking? Subscribe to The New Republic for $3.99/month.

Ayotte might have vaguely mavericky biodata for a Republican senator—when was the last time the party had a pro-life but mostly moderate New England mom to boast of?-- but she’s a footsoldier versed in talking points. This boringness is her true trump card, and the secret thus far to her national political success. She is the anti-Palin, perfect for a party still shellshocked by its grand experiment with charisma devoid of experience and not yet entirely chastened by its less-grand experiment with experience devoid of charisma. Ayotte is not going to mess up. She will hit her marks, even if she doesn’t inspire. She has carefully moved her positions rightward in order to move up in the national GOP. She is a Romney type in Palin clothing.

Or, the party appears to be hoping, she is more like an Obama in Romney clothing. After all, the dreamed-of narrative--young Senator leaps to prominence in first term, acquires previously nonexistent foreign-policy cred (she’s on the Armed Services committee; Obama was on Foreign Relations) then moves quickly on to bigger and brighter things, riding, in part, a tide against our centuries-long white-male hegemony—sounds awfully familiar. She even picked the same official Senate mentor—Joe Lieberman, a master at dancing between parties—as the president did. (Of course, Lieberman didn’t always return the affection.) 

And, like Obama, Ayotte is actually more aligned with her party’s establishment than the public might realize. She has rejected Tea Party moves like the attempt to block the Senate compromise on extending the payroll tax earlier this year, preferring to compromise. McCain compared her to Margaret Chase Smith, a trailblazing Republican woman and lion of foreign policy; others have contextualized her alongside such GOP moderates as Lisa Murkowsi and Kay Bailey Hutchison. Unlike many of the women (Nikki Haley, Susanna Martinez) with whom she was grouped in the 2010 election (of whom Hanna Rosin wrote “two factors—woman, reformer—seemed somehow linked during an election season that saw a series of female insurgents make national headlines”), Ayotte hasn’t been especially interested in shaking up the party, but rather finding her place within it, and so, grateful for the ring-kissing, the party has made plenty of room. Even her current foreign policy feint, which has exposed her to the criticism that the GOP’s Rice fixation is racially motivated, is pragmatic: she’s now more of a household name, and has staked out turf at work. Whether it works or not will be instructive in the long-term success of the Kelly Ayotte project, which is to make bland memorable.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 23 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

23 comments

I enjoy the concept of lionizing people to a degree that their last names actually become "Lion".

- SEBASTIANSALING@HOTMAIL.COM

December 7, 2012 at 4:32am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Margaret Chase Smith married a Lion? Cowardly or otherwise, what would Santorum think?!

- arpeejay

December 7, 2012 at 6:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I assumed the error was intentional. Ms. Ayotte will have some competition: Florida's attorney general, Pam Bondi. Another tea party favorite, she shines in at least one department: looks. Yep, she has the Fox News' babe blond good looks. What I admire about her is her tenacity. As the Republican controlled state Legislature and Republican Governor adapt to the election results and at least make an effort to appear like they will create an insurance exchange by talking about it if doing nothing to actually create it, the AG continues to give emotionally charged speeches challenging the constitutionality of ACA and attacking Obama as a Kenyan socialist. The election was a sobering experience for the Republicans in the Legislature, as they lost seats for the first time in a generation. But Bondi charges forward, oblivious to the election results and preparing for bigger things for her in the future. Bondi and Ayotte. That's a pair!

- rayward

December 7, 2012 at 7:40am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

John McCain still has a reputation he can put on the line? Who knew?

- WandreyCer

December 7, 2012 at 8:24am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

minus the so called charisma of Palin, her policy positions are very right wing. She is more like Jim DeMint in drag. She is pro-life, anti gay marriage and adoption, disbelieves in global warming, against increases in minimum wage...in short she is a wingnut. How can she possibly swing a single blue state red? The article seems to say it is enough to be attractive, sane sounding, and a woman, but positions matter. And in 4 to 8 years her attractivity shelf life will start to fade. As to VP, maybe but for whom? A Hispanic and woman ticket I don't see, and Ryan and Ayotte are both northerners. Maybe for a southern governor is all I can see.

- blackton

December 7, 2012 at 9:12am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

There are very few legislators that I like to listen to because they have thoroughly studied an important issue and have a thoughtful analysis, instead of just towing the party line. She isn't one of them. blackton your comment about "shelf life" reminds me of Al Franken's response to Deborah Norquist during a discussion about politics and physical attraction on the Bill Maher's "Politically Incorrect." Norquist indicated that being a babe works for awhile, "but eventually the babe wears off." Al Franken instantly looked at her and said, "I guess that's what happened to Shirley Chisolm."

- Nusholtz

December 7, 2012 at 10:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Kelly Ayotte (along with Ron Johnson, Pat Toomey and Mark Kirk) will be square in the cross-hairs of the 2016 Hillary Redux Juggernaut as Republican single-term Senators in likely Democratic states. As such, I think her political shelf-life is more likely than not to abruptly end four years from now, all looks aside.

- wildboy

December 7, 2012 at 11:33am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"John McCain has been squiring" I had a hot date tonight. The image that this opening line brought to my mind, though ... I put off the date for tomorrow, until I recover. Shudder. TNR writers should think about the mental health of their readers when they come up with lines like this. Not fair.

- icarus-r

December 7, 2012 at 11:50am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

wildboy. Dems are in a world of non-Progressive hurt if they can do no better than Hillary in 2016.

- drofnats1

December 7, 2012 at 11:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Somewhere in here is a sexism complaint trying to surface, I'm not sure why - I'm awfully hearty in these things - but it won't quite take form so I won't force it. Just saying. I think Black is on to something. There will be (already has been) a large, probably embarrassingly clumsy and obvious, effort to create visual diversity in the GOP. Net, I think that's great. But it remains to be seen what the impact will be, we're on new ground. Perhaps it will be enough, elections are won around the margins so maybe they can peel off enough independents or Republicans who sat out the last election (three million of them). 2016 is anyone's guess. But Obama won on the issues: a steady, speak-softly-but-carry-a-big-stick/drone/sniper hand in foreign policy, protecting and expanding the safety net and opportunity for the middle class, aggression against the crazies in abortion and gay rights, decision making based on empirical thinking not magical thinking. We have a long way to go (climate change anyone?) but that's what won in the end. Refusing to acknowledge that climate change is real and continuing to attack the Affordable Care Act (Christy is an idiot) in spanish instead of english, isn't going to cut it and I would hazard will even offend those in question.

- WandreyCer

December 7, 2012 at 12:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_governors which has names and photos of each governor, would lead a neutral observer to believe the GOP is the more reality-based diversity party. As for Kelly Ayotte? If she is so bland, and also fluent in French, that reminds me of John Kerry. Maybe a real journalist could at least come up with a title that is not based on the wrong stereotypes, e.g., Romney or Palin. Seems the new tnr.com is solely an attack machine, continuously in campaign mode.

- K2K

December 7, 2012 at 12:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Frost: Some say the world will end in fire, Some say in ice.. Post-post modern: The world will end in boredom. Ice is too lively.

- skahn

December 7, 2012 at 2:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

K2K - what exactly is a "really-based diversity party"? Whatever that may actually be, it doesn't exist on Capitol Hill. Anyone with two eyeballs could look at the Republican Convention versus the Democratic convention, not to mention every Romney rally and every poll in the country, to see who has a more visually diverse party. There are great Republican Govs. Its a real job with real responsibilities, not much lending itself to the empty preening for the TV cameras and donor begging of Congressmen. Ryan, Rubio, et all - any of those Prom King Capitol Hill true believers wouldn't last ten minutes in a real job like a Governor's seat.

- WandreyCer

December 7, 2012 at 2:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Dems are in a world of non-Progressive hurt if they can do no better than Hillary in 2016." You're so right, nats -- this prediction of yours is going to come true, just like all your predictions about how Obama was doomed in 2012 and how we were better off nominating a True Progressive like Russell Feingold for President instead of Obama. Yup, Hillary Clinton in 2016 is just going to fold up like a wet tent when faced with the intellectual and economic firepower of a Marco Rubio-led Republican Party. I always thought K2K was the Dick Morris of TNR, but you are obviously angling for the job from the left. Maybe you should be the Joe Trippi of TNR, given your record of successful predictions and general refraction of right-wing talking points through a left-wing mirror.

- wildboy

December 7, 2012 at 2:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"the GOP is the more reality-based diversity party." Anyone reading K2K would come to the instant conclusion that we have a bona fide surrealist performance artist among us. The 80% of Latinos and Asians, and 96% of Blacks, who voted against The Great White Hope certainly don't think that. Numbers mean something. Anyway, as a "Southerner", you really are not in a position to comment on diversity; Nixon had a "Southern Strategy" for a reason. Ever seen this? http: //www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy So, like, get real.

- icarus-r

December 7, 2012 at 3:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wild: :) I still maintain that a "Progressive" is a liberal who's afraid of his/her own shadow. Look - after South Carolina in '08, I moved out of the Hillary camp and into Obama's. In any event, anyone who had Mark Penn within 50 yards in any capacity other than as a cross-bow target had suspect judgement. But she's done good - far better than I expected - and so has Bill. Clinton-Rubio? Clinton-Bush? Clinton-Thune? I say bring it on; it will be a thumping for the ages. I mean, let's be clear: the next Republican nominee is likely to be a Perry without the Brokeback fashion sense.

- icarus-r

December 7, 2012 at 3:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

K2K, thanks for that link about the governors -- great fun! Based solely on a bunch of photographs and a rather unscientific survey sample of 50, I think that either party can claim to be a "reality-based diversity party". For example, Republicans can not only boast the only Hispanic and Indian-American governors but also the only beardless governor with a mustache (Terry Branstad); the only obese governor (Chris Christie); and the only governor who definitively proves that modern humans carry a large percentage of Neanderthal genes (Rick Perry). They can also boast two of the three governors who dye their hair blond (Mary Fallin and Jan Brewer; NC's Bev Perdue is the exception). On the other hand, Democrats boast all the black and Jewish governors; the only governor with a beard (Neil Abercrombie); and the only governor who looks like Bibi Netenyahu in his Wikipedia picture (Pat Quinn). So, all in all, I think it's at least tie on which subgroup of those 50 people looks more like Real America than the other. Of course, when you move to a slightly larger sample of American voters or American citizens, there really isn't much of a contest to see which party is more diverse, as the November 6, 2012 results convincingly demonstrated.

- wildboy

December 7, 2012 at 3:13pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Here's the problem w/TNR. You set up straw dogs No one here has ever read paleo-conservative or free market literature. You rely on knee-jerks like Noah to tell you what "conservatives" think. But they don't know & you don't know that base-line cons regard Palin as a simpleton. And Kelly as a hack politician. So TNR rambles about these frauds & hopes you never go to a real conservative site. And if you do, the fraudelent SPLC will tell you "they raciss" (sic.) True conservatives are not libertarians, but there is an overlap. Some, but not all, are race realists. Reading & digesting their disagreements may be beyond the mental capacity of the TNR site that criticized Ron Paul for criticising (saint) MLK Jr. If you are willing to risk a heart attack & go beyond what TNR allows you to think, you could look at amconmag chronicles.com vdare (currently in fundraising mode) antiwar.com amren.com

- raygun

December 7, 2012 at 4:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Oh, I almost missed it: drofnats is back. How do you think the election of November 2012 is going to pan out, drof? Always open to your insights into how the past might be changed.

- ironyroad

December 7, 2012 at 4:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Ray - I think more than one person has brought it to your attention that these boards are populated by fairly high-information readers and commenters. If you actually paid attention to what people write, you would have noticed that, for example, I routinely provide links to The American Conservative - not because I agree with everything they say, but because by and large, they are a thoughtful bunch. I am only one person, that is only one source among many of my own daily reading; I am certain that most other readers and commenters of and on TNR also have a fairly diverse information base. So, to your observation that, "You rely on knee-jerks like Noah to tell you what "conservatives" think.", in a word, or two, Fuck You. Of course, the bigger problem with your condescending and, au fond, as usual moronic comment is that The American Conservative is a self-consciously marginal magazine in the "conservative" world, much as David Frum is a marginal figure. In fact, many of the AmCon's writers have been anathematised by the Right and NRO (a source of pride for them); a third of the contributors actively supported Obama; its Foreign Policy has absolutely no place in modern Republicanism; and its economic policy, as diverse as it is, has no champion inside the mass of what passes for the conservative movement. The fact is, regardless of what AmCon thinks of the Godzilla of Wasilla, Palin was the Number 2 standard-bearer for the Republican Party; own her. Ayotte may be a whatsit, but she is a Senator - own her - and Larison is not. You can run away from your own politicians and leaders and party and find solace in the embrace of the odd sane conservative thinker out there, but that does not mean that the rest of us ought not savage with abandon such luminaries of the Right as we come across.

- icarus-r

December 7, 2012 at 5:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

icarus: Fine, for you. But TNR writers like Malone, & many posters, never leave the reservation & seem to inhabit Groundhog Day. They just keep repeating the same useless straw-man lies. Romney is a conservative (he's a corporate stooge), Palin is a conservative (she's a nullity) Kelly A is conservative (she's half a nullity), and remember, TNR readers, conservatives are bad. I have read Paul Goodman/Abraham Heschel/Susan Sontag, etc. Have Malone/Cohn/.Noah ever read or even heard of Michael Oakeshott's "Rationalism In Politics"? Their ankle-deep insights let them make jokes about teabags.

- raygun

December 7, 2012 at 7:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

thank you wildboy, for noticing my comment was SOLELY linked to that fun wiki entry of every governor, with a photo. Personally, I would like to see more brown-haired female governors and senators. Is Ashley Judd going to challenge McConnell in KY? I only commented on this thread because the title was yet another in the new-tnr.com that is un-serious for some reason. And, why just bash Republicans? I would like to know more about the rising stars (?) in the Democratic Party. Or, why Obama wants to confuse the world with a second female African-American SecState named RICE. My suggestion is Angelina Jolie. I'll wait for The New Yorker profile of Kelly Ayotte.

- K2K

December 7, 2012 at 8:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's a slow day at TNR when it degenerates to personal insults directed at other comment posters. It's sort of like a Little League bunch of Rush Limbaughs (some conservative like the original stuffed shirt version) and some liberal anti-matter, divergent mirror universe versions. Where I live, it's wet winter time, all the chipmunks are hibernating, and the squirrels are left to bullying each other. I suspect that Ms. Ayotte will bring to success a fiendish Republican scheme: being so lackluster, so boring, so transparent that she will become President by a vote of 19 to 18. Total votes throughout the United States. The rest of the population will have fallen asleep in front of their deeply profound liberal and deeply profound conservative sources of information and enlightenment.

- skahn

December 7, 2012 at 10:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close