SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Radicalism Is Not A Gaffe

JONATHAN CHAIT JUNE 10, 2010

Radicalism Is Not A Gaffe

The most important macro-development of the last thirty years of American politics is that organized conservatism, once an opposition movement that existed mostly outside of mainstream politics, captured the Republican Party in toto. The interesting micro development of the last two years is that the party is starting to be infiltrated by figures who come out of smaller and even more ideologically radical subcultures -- candidates like Rand Paul and Sharron Angle. (Jason Zengerle has a fantastic story in TNR on Paul's ideology.) The news media is doing a poor job of explaining this trend, in part because it insists upon viewing this new brand of radicalism through the lens of a "gaffe" -- Rand Paul won't support the Civil Rights Act! -- rather than explaining it in ideological terms.

For instance, Ron Bonjean of U.S. News says that Harry Reid should be careful about attacking his opponent, Sharron Angle, because Reid has said impolitic things himself:

This is a dangerous road for Reid’s campaign to follow since the majority leader seems addicted to making high profile gaffes. It feels like it was just yesterday that Reid called President Obama a “light skinned” African American who lacked a “Negro” dialect except when he decided to use one. Another such moment came when he praised the opening of the Capitol Hill Visitors Center and said, “In the summer because of the heat and high humidity, you could literally smell the tourists coming into the Capitol. It may be descriptive but it's true.” Angle has made some extreme statements as well that will also be used against her. Just imagine the televised debates with both sides throwing boomerangs of rhetorical screw-ups at each other.

This is a perfect example of a kind of pathology that afflicts journalistic thinking. "Gaffes" are simply any impolitic statement. I recently quoted Michael Kinsley's famous column on gaffes, but I'll quote a line again: "If necessary, journalists can take a significant fact such as Jesse Jackson's continuing embrace of the repellent Louis Farrakhan--drain it of all its moral implications, and turn it into a gaffe."

To the political journalist, a gaffe is any impolitic statement. But, of course, Sharron Angle hasn't committed "rhetorical screw-ups." She has made numerous expressions of a lunatic worldview.

Update: Bonjean is a former Republican spokesman, not a news reporter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 4 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

4 comments

In other words, when a politician says something once, it's called a gaffe. When a politician says something multiple times, it's called a talking point.

- jimbomoron

June 10, 2010 at 2:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Not really Jim. When a politician says something impolitic that is also not batshit crazy, that is a "gaffe". When a politician says something that is batshit crazy and he actually believes in it, it is a "gaffe" in the sense that he has let out the secret of his dark soul, but it far more serious than a gaffe, or a "talking point". Biden is a walking gaffe; Paul is a dangerous ideologue. (This is not a right-left issue, and you can find Bidenisms on the right and Paulisms on the left - Thomas' comments in Israel, for example, were not a "gaffe" but demonstrated a dangerously ignorant and lunatic perspective.)

- icarusr

June 10, 2010 at 2:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The press also like the gaffe because it gets to play the role of traffic cop: "Haha! I caught you running that red light! Aren't I an amazing cop?" thought the intrepid reporter. Trying to understand and then explain a radical worldview and why it is radical is a much harder task than simply yelling "Gotcha!" Its pure journalistic laziness.

- kraut

June 10, 2010 at 3:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Angle wants to let young people opt out of the Social Security system thereby destroying said system. If that doesn't elect Harry Reid, then he has a serious problem and deserves to lose.

- propjoe

June 10, 2010 at 4:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close