SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Scott Walker's Fraudulence

JONATHAN CHAIT FEBRUARY 24, 2011

Scott Walker's Fraudulence

Stephen Stromberg calls attention to something I didn't notice:

Wisconsin's Republican governor, Scott Walker, says that concern over his state's relatively modest budget crisis motivates his drive to strip public-sector employees of their ability to bargain collectively. And, yet, he just decided to put Wisconsin into a fiscal strait-jacket, signing a bill Tuesday that would require a two-thirds supermajority in the state legislature or a state-wide referendum to raise a range of taxes. This is not the sign of a serious budget hawk, whatever you think of Walker's policies on public-sector unions. 

It's beyond obvious that Walker's goal is to use his majority to lock in future Republican power. He has framed his policies as being driven by a deficit, but the relationship is purely coincidental. Moreover, for all his Reaganesque posturing, Walker is unwilling to forthrightly admit his ideological goals. He's hiding behind a pretext.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 12 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

12 comments

That approach has worked really well in California.

- propjoe

February 24, 2011 at 9:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Walker's fraudulence is hardly news. It is no different from the fraudulence of the Republican Party over the last thirty years. Deficits are only significant when they can be used to drive down spending on Democratic constituencies (notice that the House is not cutting agricultural subsidies and the Wisconsin Republicans are not attacking police or firefighter's unions), and they simply ignore the extent to which tax cuts contribute to, and actually drive the deficit. They are fighting a class war for the benefit of the wealthy, and intellectual consistency is not something Walker and his ilk value very highly.

- spd1955

February 24, 2011 at 10:43am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It has been obvious all along that S. Walker is a fraud and that he is motivated by a naked power grab. This datum is just one more nail in the coffin.

- liberalref

February 24, 2011 at 10:46am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I don't think it was "obvious" all along. S. Walker is a photogenic and persuasive speaker. At no time did he say "I'm going to remove bargaining rights from the Unions when I get in!" Sure, it's obvious NOW. But if you say it was always obvious, you imply that's why Wisconsin voted him into office. And I really don't think that is the case.

- AllanL5

February 24, 2011 at 10:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Walker analogizes himself to Reagan's air traffic controller union busting which Walker claims was the beginning of the fall of communism. When he speaks about the need to get rid of collective bargaining, I can put his paranoia in context.

- Nusholtz

February 24, 2011 at 11:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, there's this fraudulence, but then there's the notion that there's anything behind his empty, vacant eyes. he's stupid and aggressively stupid.

- miceelf

February 24, 2011 at 11:21am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

While Walker's "solutions" are not very useful or constructive, the problems of diminishing resources and a "shrinking" pie are real.

- skahn

February 24, 2011 at 12:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

By all along, I meant since the Wisconsin story has been elevated into a national one. Once again, I underestimated the hermeneutical skills of readers out here.

- liberalref

February 24, 2011 at 12:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

In my haste, I wrote "underestimated", when I of course meant "overestimated." I need to underestimate more, which is what I was thinking as my fingers flew over the keyboard. Au contraire, mice, SW is not at all stupid. Yes, he got conned by the Beast but that says nothing in itself. Walker is canny and dodgy, and that makes him formidable.

- liberalref

February 24, 2011 at 1:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, there must be something in the cheese for one state to have produced such monumental frauds as Paul Ryan and Scott Walker!

- MikeB.

February 24, 2011 at 4:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

liberalref, i will grant you that he's canny and dodgy. But so are lots of other stupid people. I think the distinction is between "clever" and "smart"

- miceelf

February 24, 2011 at 5:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Hilarious, Mike.

- liberalref

February 24, 2011 at 9:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close