SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Where's Moveon.Org When You Need Them? (Updated--With...

JONATHAN COHN FEBRUARY 25, 2011

Where's Moveon.Org When You Need Them? (Updated--With Answer)

Please indulge me while I share some local news: Rick Snyder, newly elected governor in my home state of Michigan, announced this week that he will call for massive cuts in state spending on education.* Very roughly, it will result in a reduction of about $470 per student.

I know enough about public education, and public education bureaucracies, to believe that school districts could find ways to reduce spending without hurting the quality of education. And, yes, it would probably mean teachers and staff making more concessions on salaries or, more likely, benefits.

But could they find $470 per student that way? I don't think so. On the contrary, I expect that schools--including the ones that my sons attend--would end up with fewer teachers, fewer courses, and fewer extracurricular offerings if the legislature approves Snyder's plan. And my kids would be among the lucky ones. It would be much worse in places like Detroit, where an ongoing funding crisis is about to swell some classes to 60 students. (No, that’s not a misprint.)

Of course, these sorts of things are happening all over the country, as the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has documented. Because the economy has depressed tax revenues, and because the federal government has stopped providing emergency financial assistance, states are cutting their budgets even though the demand for services remains unusually high. Not only is this bad for the economy; it's bad for the people who depend on services. And it's not just the poor who will notice. If you use public schools, if you need your roads cleared of snow, if you’re waiting for clerks to process permits or assessments, you will feel the impact of these cuts--if you haven't already.

And the situation might get even worse. In Washington, the same Republicans who blocked more assistance to the states are now calling for massive and immediate cuts in discretionary spending. The Republicans, left to their own devices, would eviscerate everything from Pell Grants to environmental protection inspections--although, magically, they'd still find room in the budget for large tax cuts that benefit the wealthy. Most amazing of all, these Republicans seem willing to shut down the government altogether if they can't get their way.

It's an outrageous position. So why isn't there more outrage? 

Writing in Politico this week, my former colleague Marin Cogan described a series of town halls she witnessed in Florida. And while she saw plenty of anger over government spending, all of it came from the other side: Conservatives demanding spending cuts. From her descriptions, it sounded like the early stirrings of what we saw in August, 2009, when Tea Party activists started protested health care reform.

I don't want to make too much of those anecdotes: The town halls Marin attended were for newly elected Republican lawmakers and, I gather, the activists they attracted represented a relatively extreme point of view. Even so, where is the push in the other direction? Why aren't liberals showing up at town hall meetings? Why aren't they staging rallies on Capitol Hill? I know the issue is a bit complicated, but, jeez, where's Moveon.org when you need them?

*Note: My wife is a professor at a public university that would lose some funding under Snyder’s plan. I doubt she'll feel much impact from these cuts. But, as you can guess from this item, I think my kids will.

Update: Moveon.org responds to inform me that, yes, they are organizing around this issue. In fact, they were already planning to hold simultaneous rallies in the 50 state capitals on Saturday, both to show solidarity with Wisconsin's public workers and to protest Republican spending cuts. 

That's good news. The question now is whether people will show up--and, by the way, whether the media will notice.

Here's the full press release:

Beyond Madison: “Save The American Dream” Rallies
To Take Place In All 50 State Capitals This Saturday
Huge Progressive Coalition Organizing Rallies For Noon Saturday In Every State

Tomorrow, Saturday, February 26th, nationwide rallies will take place in all 50 state capitals to show solidarity with the workers of Wisconsin and protest against the national Republican plan to slash vital services in the federal budget and potentially shutdown the government.

The Republican agenda both in Washington and in state capitals in Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio has mobilized progressives in a way not seen since the 2008 elections.

At the rallies, participants will protest the attack on workers’ rights and proposed dangerous budget cuts, and demand an investment in decent jobs. They will also highlight the fact that in Wisconsin, and across the country, Republicans are giving tax breaks to corporations and millionaires while cutting funding for education, police, emergency response, and vital direct services.

The rallies have been put together in less than four days by an unprecedented coalition of progressive organizations, led by MoveOn.org. The groups and prominent individuals supporting this include: MoveOn, Van Jones/ Rebuild the Dream, AFL-CIO, SEIU, AFSCME, USAction/ TrueMajority, Working America, Democracy for America, Jobs with Justice, National People's Action, 1Sky, 350.org, Center for Community Change, ColorOfChange.org, Courage Campaign, CREDO, Common Cause, Keystone Progress, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, People for the American Way, Progressive Majority, Presente.org, United States Student Association, Green for All, American Rights at Work, Apollo Alliance, Working Families Party, Democrats.com, Energy Action Coalition, Media Matters Action Network, Partnership for Working Families, Sierra Club, Campaign for America's Future, Campus Progress, Living Liberally, BlueGreen Alliance, DailyKos, Health Care for America Now, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Progressive Future, Progressive States Network, Brave New Films.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 10 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

10 comments

Propose cutting farm subsidies or the unfunded Medicare prescription coverage which added hundreds of billions to the national debt, then see how many Tea Party "activists" remain budget hawks.

- dubyadoubte

February 25, 2011 at 9:41am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I've actually emailed MoveOn about a month ago asking if they have a town hall strategy. Haven't gotten any response as of yet.

- sighthnd

February 25, 2011 at 9:42am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Cohn knows Florida is a mess, with an abundance of very young and very old, and not enough in the middle. And it's not going to get any better. As a Florida native, it saddens me. Not that Floridians before the great migration south were big supporters of public education, but unlike those Floridians, the bulk of the current Floridians believe they have no stake in public education or the young who would benefit from it. It's similar to Michigan, where high unemployment, a falling property base, and a sagging economy impose on a relatively few the obligation for funding public education. The difference between Florida and Michigan is that the former chooses not to adequately fund public education whereas the latter has little choice.

- rayward

February 25, 2011 at 10:00am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

While it is not quite so simple, this is at least in part the consequence of Obama's failing to give battle to the Republicans for a good year and a half while they basically had the public forum to themselves, kicked the rhetorical crap out of the left, and then won a large electoral victory on the strength of their rhetorical success. This is demoralizing to everyone who is inclined toward activism, and activists are necessary, not just a nuisance to be placated with the least possible effort. In short, these are the wages of Obama's failure to be a political leader, rather than policy-wonk-in-chief sitting comfortably in the White House chatting with advisers. The principal job of the president is politician-in-chief. Wonks can do the policy with some guidance from the president as to the outcome he seeks (see, e.g., FDR). Obama did not do his job.

- roidubouloi

February 25, 2011 at 11:23am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The problem with states is that they need to draw businesses and businesses can locate in a state because of taxes. But once states make the choice to cut taxes and corresponding spending, they have chosen a path that may be short lived when other states offer cultural advantages that offset the difference in tax rates. We really need smart government and right now the guy with the biggest scissors is considered smart.

- Nusholtz

February 25, 2011 at 11:30am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

roi nails it. Until our 21st century Chamberlain (a decent man and moderate to liberal in his time) is replaced with someone who knows what he stands for and sticks to it, you are not going to get strong pushback to uncompromising opposition that will do most anything to increase their power. You ain't gonna get intense and maintained crowd participation in the political game with the equivalent of the Haahvard cheer led by a cheerleader with Boston Brahmin enthusiasm and one pinkie raised on high: H -A- R with a V, V- A- R with a D. Haarvhard, Haarvhard. Wheee!!

- drofnats1

February 25, 2011 at 5:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Bravo Roi.

- Sophia

February 26, 2011 at 12:10am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with Sophia. Great post, Roi. I guess we have no choice but to support Obama in 2012, but it will be simply because the alternative would be even worse.

- PeteBeck

February 26, 2011 at 8:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Regarding the update, it is a positive step to have widespread public rallies in the state capitols, and I hope they were successful yesterday. However, that does not obviate the need for a liberal counterpresence to the Tea Party at the town hall meetings to let the elected officials, especially those from swing districts or who got elected by posing as moderates, that there's a constituency that expects them to balance the real needs of the country against the eventual need to bring the budget into balance.

- sighthnd

February 27, 2011 at 10:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I was at the Smithsonian Museum of American History this weekend. One of the exhibits had some footage of FDR bashing the GOP in what looked like a radio press conference (I think). In it he was bashing the GOP for first going after his wife, then his sons, and that they had now descended to attacking his dog. He made them look foolish. He wasn't afraid to pick a public fight with them. Imagine Obama doing the same. He can't. And that explains much of why FDR won big in 1934 whereas the Democrats got blown out in 2010. The leader of the party acted like it in 1933-34. In 2009-10 he didn't. Partisan leadership at the top does matter but we haven't had any for decades on the progressive side.

- tmmats

February 28, 2011 at 5:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close