PLANK DECEMBER 22, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Just like Susan Rice, Senator John Kerry was one of candidate Barack Obama’s earliest supporters, back when it was risky. The conventional wisdom was that Hillary Clinton was going to win and the people who had failed to join her would be left with tombstones for careers. (“A Clinton never forgets,” the terrified saying went.) Just like Rice, Kerry hoped for a certain, specific prize. For Rice it was national security advisor; for Kerry, secretary of state. And, just like Susan Rice, Kerry saw his dreams dashed when, four Decembers ago, president-elect Barack Obama nominated Clinton to be his secretary of state. Kerry was left in the Senate, where he consoled himself as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Rice, too saw her dreams dashed, and the ineffectual James L. Jones got to take a very short stab at national security advisor, while she began serving as U.N. ambassador.
But unlike Rice, who saw her dream job plucked from her yet again this month, Kerry was nominated on Friday by Obama to serve him as secretary of state. What Obama said about him – that Kerry’s “entire life has prepared him for this role” – is also presumably what Obama would have said about Susan Rice, had he ever gotten around to nominating her.
But unlike Kerry and Clinton, Rice is not, and never has been a politician. It is something she has never really been interested in. Though she once harbored the ambition of becoming a senator, by the time college was over the dream was too. Being an elected official – being in politics, rather than policy – was not her thing. She didn’t want to glad hand and beg for money when she could be doing real, concrete things, she recently told me. “I did not have the patience to be a politician,” she said.
The secretary of state’s office, it turns out, is now just another elected office. And Kerry, though he ran the Democratic version of the limp and fumbling Romney campaign in 2004 (when Rice was a policy surrogate for him) is a better politician. He is friends with Senator John McCain, the man who sank Rice. Unlike Rice, who, as Obama’s foreign policy surrogate, slammed McCain in the 2008 race, Kerry has avoided pissing him off. Though McCain campaigned against Kerry, the two became pals through the bond of a shared war. In 1991, when Kerry was asked to chair a committee to investigate the possibility of American servicemen still languishing in Vietnam, the panel faced resistance from nutters. “I'd see the way some of these guys were exploiting the families of those missing in action, and I'd begin to get angry," McCain told The New Yorker a decade ago, "and John would sense it and put his hand on my arm to calm me down before I'd lose my effectiveness."
And if, unlike Kerry, Rice is known to her friends as a warm and loyal, genuine to the point of bluntness – a person who, as her high school basketball teammate told me, doesn’t hog the ball or crave the limelight – Kerry has been, almost since birth, a political animal, however clumsily. In that same New Yorker profile of Kerry, he is described as “risible” in his attempts to emulate the man who shared his initials, JFK:
Serious as all this was – he was, for a moment…the most compelling leader of the antiwar movement – there was something uneasy, and perhaps even faintly risible, about it, too, particularly the ill-disguised Kennedy playacting. Even as Kerry delivered his Senate testimony [about his opposition to the Vietnam War], he distorted his natural speech to sound more like that earlier J.F.K.; for example, he occasionally "ahsked" questions. (Kerry had befriended Robert F. Kennedy's speechwriter Adam Walinsky and consulted him about the speech, bouncing phrases and ideas off the old master.) This sort of thing had been a source of merriment for his classmates ever since prep school, where the joke was that his initials really stood for "Just For Kerry." He had volunteered to work on Edward Kennedy's 1962 Senate campaign, had dated Janet Auchincloss, who was Jacqueline Kennedy's half sister, had hung out at Hammersmith Farm, the Auchincloss family's estate in Newport, and had gone sailing with the President. A practical joke-one of many, apparently-was played on him in the 1966 Yale yearbook: he was listed as a member of the Young Republicans.
Kerry’s selection is a reminder that the country’s top diplomat is, first and foremost, a politician. He may not be the best politician, but to get the post, it seems, you have to play the game.
6 comments
What a whiny, holier than thou little article.
- Crock1701
December 22, 2012 at 2:01am
Yes, politics is personal, isn't it. Now, after Kerry is confirmed and we can consider policy rather than personality, what comes next, in particular, what comes next for Syria. Here’s the final four paragraphs of Kerry’s statement about Syria at the beginning of hearings in his committee this past summer: “I continue to believe that prudent military planning is an imperative. But I also believe that we have to be clear-eyed about that. It would be important not to repeat the mistakes of the past by thinking we can just ‘willy-nilly’ commit some forces to a conflict without a definition or achievable objective - and certainly without a sober evaluation of the costs and implications thereof. That is owed not just to the American people, but certainly to the men and women of our armed forces who have been stretched over these years. “Assad’s removal is only the beginning. At last month’s ‘Friends of Syria’ conference, 130 countries and entities agreed to support a transition plan developed by a broad array of Syrian opposition groups. That is not insignificant, my friends. One hundred and thirty countries have already agreed to a transition plan, and increasingly countries in the region are becoming more committed to that transition. “We need to conduct greater planning with these groups and the international community to prepare for the transition. Our plans should include power-sharing provisions to ensure that all of the key sects are brought into the process, give greater definition than we have today to the Free Syrian Army, and to the opposition – that’s something they have to do for themselves but we have to encourage it and help provide the capacity for it, the framework for it, much as we did with Libya, and in other instances. “In addition, we learned the hard way in Iraq, a winner-take-all transition where key minority groups are excluded and the military is unable to provide basic security is simply a recipe for prolonged civil war.” That final paragraph is, one can only hope, the expression of the Kerry State Department policy toward Syria. If not, then we can expect the carnage to continue, as Shia from Iraq and Iran come to the aid of their Shia brothers in Syria. Given America’s obsession about Iran, however, I have my doubts about any American efforts to support the Shia (Alawites) in Syria, or any place else.
- rayward
December 22, 2012 at 7:29am
"Kerry’s selection is a reminder that the country’s top diplomat is, first and foremost, a politician." Maybe, but only since 2009. One could argue that some of a politician's skillsets are very useful for a diplomat, but Obama's cabinet has been heavily skewed to politicians, allegedly because he sees Cabinet Secretaries as WH lobbyists to Congress. Would be helpful if The New Yorker article so heavily cited here actually had a workable link. Was this the article by McGrath, Toobin, Mayer, Gourevitch, or Hertzberg? based on my search results 2002-2004, those are the writers who pop up...
- K2K
December 22, 2012 at 7:37am
Kerry does not appear to have a workable plan for Syria. Reconciliation after the current brutal civil war looks difficult. Modern Syria is an artificial state carved out of the Ottoman Empire by European colonial powers after World War I and composed of mutually antagonistic sects and nationalities, one reason it usually took a brutal dictator to hold it together, same as in Iraq. The most humane course of action would be to separate the major sects and nationalities into separate autonomous cantons or even separate sovereign states. I am also concerned that Kerry, like Obama, would put undue trust in the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists and even enhance their role in the further development of Syria and neighboring countries.
- amidut
December 22, 2012 at 11:13am
Thank you Rayward for the extensive quote from Kerry's statement about Syria at a Foreign Relations Committee meeting last summer.
- amidut
December 22, 2012 at 11:20am
Perhaps Rice can become America's James Bond, quietly taking out inconvenient people such as Assad.
- skahn
December 22, 2012 at 4:01pm