THE PLANK JULY 28, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
David Frum continues to be an invaluable, and lonely, voice of reason in the midst of the conservative crackup. Here he is offering some perspective on the bitter declinism sweeping the GOP:
The apocalyptic despair heard from today’s conservatives is wrong,
wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong as a description of reality, wrong
politically, wrong psychologically, wrong morally....In 1975, the federal government set the price of every airline
ticket, every ton of rail freight, every cubic foot of natural gas and
every barrel of oil. It controlled the interest rates paid on checking
accounts and the commission charged by stockbrokers. If you wanted to
ship a crate of lettuce from one state to another, you first had to
file a routemap with a federal agency. It was a crime for a private
citizen to own a gold coin. The draft had ended only two years before,
but not until 1975 itself did Congress formally end the state of
emergency (and the special grant of presidential powers) declared at US
entry into the First World War.
And here he is on the paranoia and extremism that this declinism nourishes:
If I lived in a country in imminent danger of a Bolshevik or Fascist
seizure of power, I’d be a cowardly fool if I failed to use every means
to prevent it, including violence if need be. If it were true that our
political opponents wanted to impose tyranny on the United States – if
(as Rush Limbaugh said the other day) a vote for the other party was a
vote for “totalitarianism, dungeons, and torture,” then what patriot
could possibly abide a political defeat?Happily, none of those things are true. As wrong and harmful as the
Obama administration’s plans are, the administration is playing by the
rules of the game. To agitate people into thinking otherwise is to
corrode the foundations of the American constitutional regime....If America has been sliding gently but irresistibly into soft
despotism, where were all the valiant defenders of liberty before
November of 2008? Soft despotism begins to look less like a profound
sociological trend, more like undulations of the sine curve: It’s
despotism when we lose, freedom when we win. We should have more
confidence in the people and the country than this. We should also have
more charity to our political opponents – who after all are contending
with hideous problems bequeathed to them by … by … well suddenly we
Republicans cannot seem to remember who preceded Barack Obama in
office. To listen to us, you’d think that the bailouts and takeovers
started on January 20, 2009, not the previous March. You’d never know
that TARP was supported by almost every Republican commentator,
including the editors of National Review. Or that Vice
President Cheney argued urgently in favor of the rescue of the Detroit
automakers. Or that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac enjoyed the backing of
Republican as well as Democratic lawmakers.
Sad, that in order to have a platform for such observations, Frum had to leave National Review and launch a new website.
--Christopher Orr
5 comments
It's not sad. Let conservatives figure things out amongst themselves.
TNR should not be that platform either. Oh I forgot.. he gets a free pass because he's a RJC director.
- RJSampson
July 28, 2009 at 2:16pm
First, I must concur that David Frum is awesome. No doubt about that. The zombies are certainly on their way to feast on his blood as I write this and we all know it.
I have to take issue with the concept of "soft despotism". Descriptively, I get it, it's one-man-band ruling style that allows input from the citizenry, but once despotism becomes soft enough, doesn't it cease to be despotism?
- dylanposer
July 28, 2009 at 2:43pm
One can only imagine what thrills went through Rush's mind when he mentioned said "totalitarianism, dungeons, and torture".
- wildboy
July 28, 2009 at 2:49pm
Sad, maybe, but even sadder are the comments on his blog.
Say, if the winger alarmists are really right, where can I sign up to be a freedom-crushing jackbooted thug (working for ACORN's secret paramilitary wing, perhaps)? I could use some extra income now that Obama has destroyed capitalism, and I've long wanted to see the New World Order's secret HQ inside the Hollow Earth. I'm sure it's a sight to behold.
- frippo
July 28, 2009 at 2:52pm
frum:
As wrong and harmful as the Obama administration’s plans are, the administration is playing by the rules of the game. To agitate people into thinking otherwise is to corrode the foundations of the American constitutional regime....
george:
Allow me please to translate this:
The Democrats do Bilderberg one way and the Republicans do it another. But there are always two fundamental assumptions both Democrats and Republicans staunchly adhere to:
1]
The role crony capitalism plays in distributing wealth [and thus power] at home and...
2]
The role crony capitalism plays in distributing wealth [and thus power] abroad
Basically Frum is just reminding us that as long as the center holds neither the right wing nor the left wing "nuts" will prevail.
And that's always good news no matter how bad things get in the middle.
Fortunately, the world economy has begun to stabilize [and turn itself around]; thus there is a much greater likelihood that the wingnuts will not prevail. In other words, that they will not be needed as they were by Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and Mao.
And given the terrible pain and suffering those at the bottom of the global economy's trickle down ladder the best we can hope for is this: It doesn't get much better.
This is the line those who apoligize for that terrible reality embrace. And in that respect Frum's point of view is no better or worse than Orr's. It is really more a question of whether Frum or Orr are gaming the system as practioners of the politics of conviction or as practioners of the politics of convenience. In other words, are they "realists" or "idealists"?
How about it, Christopher, which one are you?
george walton
- iambiguous
July 28, 2009 at 6:55pm