THE PLANK APRIL 17, 2007
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Not that there's any bad blood between John Kerry and John Edwards, but the Democrats' 2004 presidential nominee--or, rather, some people presumably close to him--just tried to throw his former running mate under the bus. From today's Boston Globe:
As he runs for president, John Edwards has cast himself as a candidate who puts candor ahead of politics by saying he was wrong to vote for the Iraq war resolution.
[snip]
Yet as John Kerry's 2004 ticketmate, the former North Carolina senator was anything but eager to acknowledge error on Iraq. Instead, according to several Kerry-Edwards campaign aides, Edwards argued repeatedly that the two should stand by their votes, even after it had become apparent that Iraq had neither weapons of mass destruction nor collaborative ties with Al Qaeda.
The matter came to a head in 2004. On Aug. 6, with no WMD found and no terrorist ties discovered, President Bush commenced an audacious political gambit, declaring that even "knowing what we know now" he would still have invaded Iraq.
What would Kerry have done, he demanded? To the dismay of many Democrats, Kerry, speaking at the Grand Canyon on Aug. 9, said he would still have voted for the war resolution because "it was the right authority for the president to have."
His response was quickly seen as a lost opportunity. However, one man who had been adamant that Kerry shouldn't disavow his vote was Edwards. Although Edwards wasn't with Kerry that day, the two had been traveling by train together over the weekend. Once Bush issued his challenge, the campaign knew the press would soon put the question to the Democratic duo, and so, prior to an event on that Aug. 7 in La Junta, Colo., Kerry and Edwards and various aides huddled to discuss possible responses.
"I specifically remember Edwards having a very distinct take," says one person in attendance, who paraphrases Edwards's argument this way: "We need to stick to this. We should stand by our votes, say we would vote that way again. If you admit a mistake, it shows weakness in time of war. That's what the Republicans want us to do."
Adds a senior adviser who was there: "There was a discussion about how to answer the question: 'Was your vote on Iraq a mistake?' John Edwards had a very strong opinion that we should not waver, and it would show a sign of weakness if we did." A third source confirms those accounts.
It'll be interesting to see in the coming days and months whether other negative accounts of Edwards's 2004 performance as Kerry's running mate appear in Kerry's hometown paper.
--Jason Zengerle
6 comments
to despise Kerry. Neil
- purcellneil
April 17, 2007 at 1:19pm
First it comes out Edwards voted for the authorization to stay politically relevant. Then he told Kerry not to change his position on his vote because it might look weak, politically. Here's my question: When, exactly, are we to believe Mr. Edwards finally gave up taking political expedient positions?
- adamvaught
April 17, 2007 at 1:33pm
I have no idea what game Kerry is up to and I don't care. He has zero credibility left in my book.
- blackton
April 17, 2007 at 1:57pm
I think Kerry gets too much flak, and I personally find him more impressive than Edwards. But this attack seems awfully petty--either petty or aggressive: maybe it's the first move in his 2008 campaign.
- ralphnelle
April 17, 2007 at 2:19pm
both times. I don't know what Kerry's motive could be in bringing this up. But I'd like to point out that it isn't really a valid criticism of Edwards in any case. In the 2004 race, the biggest hit on Kerry was that he was a waffler (about the war, and other things). Edwards's advice to Kerry at that time was sound: Kerry couldn't afford to appear to waffle any more. On the other hand, Edwards has no such problem now (not to mention that both the politics of Iraq and the situation on the ground there are much clearer now than they were then).
- s-kamin
April 17, 2007 at 5:11pm
Kerry's fear of the flip-flop bs MADE it significant. He should have said what he believed and made the issue about Bush's stubbornness + unwillingness to admit mistakes. This was a major f-up for his campaign. It weakened his case against the war and blew an opportunity to shift attention to Bush's personality/leadership flaws.
- ralphnelle
April 17, 2007 at 6:02pm