SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Lawyers Prepare For Rosenblat Feud

THE PLANK DECEMBER 29, 2008

Lawyers Prepare For Rosenblat Feud

When Berkley Books announced it was canceling the Feb. 3 release of Herman Rosenblat's Holocaust memoir, Angel at the Fence, the publisher said it would demand that Rosenblat and his agent Andrea Hurst repay the entire advance.

In the days since Berkley yanked Rosenblat's book, Hurst has consulted lawyers to "protect her interests," while a lawyer for film producer Harris Salomon told me tonight that their side is considering a fight against publisher's decision to pull the book.

On Dec. 28, Hurst told the New York Times that the book was sold for "less than $50,000." Agents usually take 15 percent of any book sale, so Hurst would have pocketed less than $7,500 for the deal. She hasn't yet returned any money. "I am
seeking legal advice to protect my interests," she emailed me later that evening. Recouping the advance will be tricky for Berkley, because a "bulk of the money received so far" was paid out to ghost-writer Susanna Margolis, Hurst said. One source said that Herman so far was paid only $4,000 for the memoir. Hurst hasn't been contacted yet by Berkley's legal department. "I have received nothing from Berkley yet. I am sure I will hear soon," she emailed.

Hurst also claims that she was misled by Herman. "The more I learn about this story the more unbelievable it becomes. That a family would hide this lie and his daughter even went to the Oprah show with him," she wrote me. "In the end though, it is Herman that continued to tell the story, whatever his reasons were. All I ever wanted to do was help bring a hope filled story to the world. After I read his story in Guideposts I was very touched.  At the end Herman said his
dream was to have a book someday. I wanted to help him make his dream
come true. From a dream to a nightmare, it is still unbelievable to me."

Early on the morning of Dec. 30, Hurst emailed that she isn't planning to fight Berkley at this time. "I have NO intention of fighting Berkley in any way and I [don't] have legal representation at this time."

Harris Salomon is also weighing his legal options. This evening, I spoke with SaraLynn Mandel, a lawyer from Thousand Oaks, CA, who says she is now representing Salomon. "There's a feeling that [Berkley is] interfering with the book being published,
and the movie getting made. It appears they are not publishing the
book. Do they have that right? Have they appropriately looked at the
information, and made a decision based on the information?" she said by phone.

Mandel, a partner with the Pasadena firm Mandel & Adriano, told me she had no connection to Salomon until yesterday. She was outraged that Berkley had canceled Herman's memoir, and got in touch with Salomon to offer her legal services. "I believe there could be not just a defense, but also an offensive position here," Mandel said. "I don't think the whole thing has been appropriately handled by the
publisher. I don't think the publisher had taken the time to calmly look
at this and see what they wanted to do. There was a knee jerk reaction."

Mandel says Harris could argue that the negative reaction to Rosenblat's story following Berkley's announcement has damaged his ability to make his movie based on Rosenblat's life. "I believe there is the potential for some claims if they've damaged the ability for Harris to make the movie," she said, citing tortious interference as one possible case to pursue.

Rosenblat hasn't commented on his fabricated memoir, beyond the statement released on Dec. 27. Mandel says she spoke with Rosenblat today and his family has instructed him not to talk to the media. Mandel, who is not representing Rosenblat, said he has been considering releasing an additional statement via YouTube, but no decisions have been made yet.

--Gabriel Sherman

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

Last week, TNR published an article by Gabriel Sherman, whose original reporting revealed that a new

- Anonymous

December 29, 2008 at 11:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Here we thrust into the truly surreal relationship between truth and lawyers.

Attorneys are notorious for obfuscating any and all attempts by one side or the other to reach a literal chronology of events in the manner in which, say, geologists seek to lay out evidence regarding the literal formation of the planet Earth.

Instead, layers of language are vigorously compromised or corrupted by additional layers of language until everyone is sufficiently satisfied that nothing really substantial has been accomplished or revealed.

Then it is only a matter of time before Rosenblat and his story become the last thing the language is focused on.

Fees and folly, in other words.

george walton

- iambiguous

December 30, 2008 at 2:37am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world... but for Wales?"

For $4000?  

- icarusr

December 30, 2008 at 9:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Icarus,  a propos your comment the other day about your ancestors, have you ever seen the movie Kind Hearts and Coronets?

- satyendra

December 30, 2008 at 10:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I have, indeed, though I dare say I have never been moved to kill any of my relatives ;-) ...

- icarusr

December 30, 2008 at 10:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Forensic Genealogy for Writers by Sharon Sergeant: Update 12/30/2008 Herman and Roma Rosenblat

- Anonymous

January 6, 2009 at 7:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close