THE STUMP OCTOBER 8, 2011
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

[Guest post by Simon van Zuylen-Wood]
“I came as a Perry fan,” 42-year-old defense consultant David Hebert told me as he stood in a long line of Values Voter Summit attendees waiting to get their copies of This Is Herman Cain! autographed. “It would have taken a lot to shake me. But I changed my mind with that speech.” Judging from the frenzied hooting and high-five-your-neighbor reaction to Cain’s speech Friday afternoon, he was not the only one. (Straw poll results will be announced at 3 pm today, but I’d be surprised if Cain doesn’t win or come in a very close second to Rick Perry.)
The story from Day One of the Christian conservative powwow was not merely that Cain killed it and Perry underwhelmed. That was a foregone conclusion before either of them spoke—when Texas megapastor Robert Jeffress introduced Perry onstage, he tried to exhort the crowd with the unfortunate question, “Do we want a candidate who is skilled in rhetoric or one who is skilled in leadership?” (Confused applause.)
The bigger takeaway was this: Perry, the GOP frontrunner most attuned to the persuasions of right-wing Christian voters, completely blew his opportunity to win them over. His breathy, overwrought speech rambled from “You don’t spend all the money” to illegal immigrants “peddling poisons to our children” but hardly touched on the point of the whole event: family values conservatism. Instead it was Cain, not known for his religious views, and in fact targeted at the event by the National Organization for Marriage for not having signed a pledge of theirs (the other frontrunners have), who galvanized a ballroom full of Evangelicals and born-again Christians with rousing promises to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act and protect unborn children.
Perry went on at about 2:30 pm on Friday, accompanied by a thumping country anthem. The speaker who preceded Perry, Iowa Congressman Steve King, used his time to quote scripture and explicate the connections between Jesus’s teachings and the American founding. I expected Perry to continue in this vein. In fact, when he began his speech, “I’m … proud to be joined today by my best friend, somebody who has done more to enrich my life than any other person,” I was positive he was talking about Jesus. When he added that this “individual” would “be a fabulous first lady,” I began to have my doubts.
In his 25-minute speech, Perry didn’t completely ignore social issues, but he addressed them vaguely, saying things like the “most basic unit of governments is the family.” But as a man who two months ago led 30,000 Texans in prayer and has unabashedly defended state policies like abstinence-only sex education, Perry enjoyed a built-in connection with the audience his two main competitors didn’t. But somehow, Perry misread the crowd. After the speech, National Review Online columnist Kathryn Jean Lopez was a little incredulous, telling me, “I imagine the poor guy could have forgotten which event he was at.”
Cain did much better. Introduced by VVS emcee Gil Mertz as a man who “embodies the fulfillment of the American dream,” Cain went on at about 4:30 pm. For the next half-hour Cain’s energy never flagged, thundering proudly about his self-made success and earning standing ovation after standing ovation for lines like, “9-9-9 means jobs, jobs, jobs!”—referring to his famously regressive tax plan. And when he stepped out of his comfort zone to address social issues, he did so with the same fervor. “I believe in life from conception. Period. No exceptions,” he rhymed. Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, he said, depended on Life—“and that includes the life of the unborn.” He’d make sure, he bellowed above the din of the ballroom crowd, that the Department of Justice would enforce the Defense of Marriage Act.
It’s well known that Herman Cain enjoys public speaking, while Perry has appeared a bit flummoxed at the last two debates. But at the Values Voter Summit, the one-time front-runner lost out to Cain on both the message and the medium.
5 comments
TNR must be really desperate for pageviews: I've been seeing the same link about "female masturbation" at the end of articles that have nothing to do with sex for months now.
- jaltcoh.blogspot.com
October 8, 2011 at 12:50pm
Actually, Ron Paul won the Values Voters straw poll -- easily -- even though he shares almost none of the social views of that bunch. This is because Ron Paul supporters have nothing better to do with their lives than read Ayn Rand novels and attend right-wing conventions to vote their love for Ron Paul. I suppose hanging out for hours with a bunch of snake-wigglers in order to vote in a popularity contest that almost no one will remember in a week is preferable to cracking open The Fountainhead for the eleventh time. Herman Cain came in a respectable second. Perry and Bachmann were way back with about 8 percent each.
- DC Spence
October 8, 2011 at 6:00pm
good summary DCSpence. One wonders about these straw polls, and who is in attendance. But, I did watch the articulate Dr. Jeffress on MSNBC clarify why the Southern Baptist Convention classifies Mormonism as a cult, and then returned to reading a wonderful one-volume history of WW2 by Andrew Roberts (must have been the part about General Patton's divine guidance in his mission to kill the enemy ...) which helped me then sleep off my flu because I figure the entire country is crazy, and always has been. Well, maybe not as crazy when most of the country was drunk on fermented apple cider.
- K2K
October 8, 2011 at 7:44pm
I seem to have read somewhere that there was a surprising (or perhaps not) "late surge" of registrations, the number of which very closely resembled Ron Paul's eventual straw poll total. Hmm.
- jcovell
October 9, 2011 at 7:49am
I figure the entire country is crazy, and always has been. Well, maybe not as crazy when most of the country was drunk on fermented apple cider. Interesting speculation, but perhaps channeling "American exceptionalism" too much. My suspicion is that the entire human race is crazy, and not just the [dis]-United States of America. However, how does one measure sane and crazy? In terms of physical science measurements, as arbitrary as they are, there are internationally accepted standards and benchmarks, so that one can say with some sincerity and something of a straight face how long a meter is (or yard), or how much a gram weighs (or ounce), and so on. However, as human beings are (with quibbles about whales, ravens, elephants, and octopi, etc.) the only intelligent, abstract-thinking, reasoning beings we know of, how do we measure how crazy we are? The American Psychiatric Association has the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) which is advertised as "the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States." As this publication comes from a profession that not that long ago supported and practiced such enlightened beliefs and practices as lobotomy, electroshock treatment, straight jackets, dubious pharmaceutical nostrums, and so on, must we not wonder who are the witch doctors? Note to self: Time to get out and reread One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest again.
- skahn
October 10, 2011 at 1:09am