SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Italian Job

WORLD CUP JUNE 13, 2010

The Italian Job

I still remember the moment I found the religion of Italian football—like all religions a story of obsession, agony, and deceit. It was the 67th minute of the first round match between Italy and Argentina, held at the River Plate stadium in Buenos Aires on June 10, 1978.

I was in Beirut, squinting through the smears of my black and white television, when Roberto Bettega took the ball outside the penalty box. He passed off to Paolo Rossi, immersed in defenders, then ran into the open toward the penalty spot. Somehow Rossi squeezed the ball through and Bettega caught it on the run, sending Filliol, the Argentinean goalkeeper the wrong way: 1-0 Italy, on Argentina’s turf.

There the match would end, and I was hitched, though I had never paid attention to the Squadra Azzura. Perhaps it was the goalkeeper in me who admired Italy’s captain Dino Zoff, his flawless positioning and dour mien of the Friulani, who when hoisting the World Cup in triumph four years later had to be pinched to bring on a smile.

Amid predictions that Spain, Brazil, Argentina, or England, will win in South Africa, you could be forgiven for forgetting that Italy is the title-holder. That’s how it’s always been, or almost. Expect the Italians to do well (as in the tournament they hosted in 1990), and they will wilt like a four-day rose. Heap abuse on them, ensure that key players have just returned from a match-fixing scandal (as in 1982), or are about to suffer retribution from a fresh one (as in 2006), and the team somehow finds its rhythm like an impala fleeing a jaguar.

So what is there to like in Italian football? Quite a few things, I’ve discovered, that most other football supporters hate, which only makes it better. I offer up five here.

First, from this hatred comes an Italian delight in defiance that invariably drifts into self-pity and paranoia. Everyone is against Italy, we supporters and the team know, and have long known, so we take pleasure in our solidarity against a world heartened by our defeats.

But then the divisiveness kicks in. And that’s a second thing I like. Because while we are as one against the world, we will also descend into the most bitter disputation over how to defend Italy’s honor—disputation no less corrosive than that between the Renaissance city states. Why hasn’t Lippi brought in better attackers? Sacchi, what a criminal, a filthy criminal, for not playing Baggio. Damn Maldini’s eyes, if he had any. And so on. And in that divisiveness is true pluralism, infuriating, invigorating, man’s highest condition.

Which leads to a third quality most scorned in the Italians, the pervasive fear and loathing circulating between supporters and the team; fear of defeat and humiliation, which in our Mediterranean culture brings loathing (of the team, of ourselves), since nothing is more contemptuous than a coward. Banish African insouciance, English doggedness, Brazilian inspiration; with Italy, football crushes the lightness of being Italian, invites only anguish. It’s difficult not to like a country that takes its football that seriously.

Then there are the tactics defined by fear, a fourth quality so detested in the Italians: their overreliance on defensive football. Gone, perhaps, is the letter of catenaccio, but not the spirit. And yet there can be much beauty in defense, in the perfect precision of anti-football. Take the dreariest of World Cup finals, that between Brazil and Italy in USA ’94. The match ended in a 0-0 draw and was won by Brazil on penalties. Devotees of offense groaned. The universe fell asleep. But rarely had an Italian team been so faultless in protecting its goal. Defense became the great leveler allowing Italy to stand up to the better Brazilians, a praiseworthy instrument of egalitarianism.

Which leaves us with a fifth object of repugnance: Italy’s erraticism. We might lose to North or South Korea on the turn of a hat, yet defeat Diego Maradona’s Argentina, the indomitable Brazilians of Socrates and Falcao, and Paul Breitner’s West Germany, all in one flourish to take the cup home in 1982. Every tournament brings surprises, but before long we realize, to our consternation, we the faithful armed with the patience of Job, that Italy has won the World Cup four times, and that we were too busy pouring ash on our head to appreciate it.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 2 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

2 comments

Wow this is odd: It talks about how people hate the Italian team, but misses one crucial quality that turns off all lovers of true football: The diving, flopping, preening of all of their players. The absolute flop that beat a plucky Australia in the 90th minute, Matarazzi falling down like he'd been shot by Zidane, the combination of diving, and then reckless play and whinging in their 1-1 draw vs. the Americans (remember De Rossi breaking McBride's face?). The Italians are a dirty, dirty team, even before you get to the match fixing. Beyond, of course, the self loathing or expected defeat is most assuredly not exemplified by the Italians: That, of course, is an English trait. They're the pre-2004 Red Sox of football, always assured that something will cock up and the team will fall. Just as a Red Sox fan could recite the names Dent, Buckner, Pesky/Slaughter, Ruth, and Boone to you, so an England fan recalls the Hand of God, Beckham '98, Rooney/Ronaldo '06, Seaman '02, Waddle '90, and will dread penalties and the rest with the best of them. Italy doesn't expect lose nearly as much as the boys in Red and White: They've won two of the last seven World Cups as well as 2nd most all time and are current holders. What great tragedy in the game do they remember beyond say North Korea '66?

- Crock1701

June 13, 2010 at 6:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

there can be much beauty in defense, in the perfect precision of anti-football. Unfortunately for the Italians, this beauty is only appreciated by the team that has nothing to gain by trying to dominate. Whereas Italians only want the team that concedes least to win, most supporters want the best team, or at least the dominating team to win. This phenomenon is called justice. Most people want the team that works hardest, tries to score the most, and creates most chances, to win. Most neutral supporters feel that such a team deserves victory. With the extremely defensive tactics of the previous decades, Italy has tried to defy justice, and as Crock points out, Italy has succeeded several times. You can't expect others to acknowledge that there is beauty in your injustice.

- yzon

June 13, 2010 at 7:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close