Pete Peterson

Obama Beat the Hostage-Takers. Now He Has to Fight the Fiscal Scolds.
October 16, 2013

Obama successfully beat back the hostage takers. He should do the same to the deficit scolds.

Fiscal Scolds: The Next Generation
May 08, 2013

Pete Peterson's long game to reduce the national debt involves wooing college kids with cash prizes and a visit to Bill Clinton's conference.

The Pathologies Of The Anti-Deficit Lobby
July 11, 2011

The anti-deficit lobby is a powerful force in American political life.

The Triumph Of Pete Peterson
May 26, 2011

Here's the beginning of NPR's report on the Peterson-funded fiscal summit yesterday:  American Political heavyweights gathered in Washington today. They met to tackle the biggest problem facing the nation: the massive public debt. The financier Pete Peterson, in a genuine act of public spiritedness, has spent huge sums of his fortune to persuade elites and the public that the public debt is the biggest crisis facing the public. This is, of course, a matter of opinion.

Bowles And Simpson To Suckle At Petersen Teat
March 10, 2011

Naftali Bendavid reports that a bipartisan debt reduction plan is picking up steam in the Senate.

Deficit Reduction As Ideology
December 02, 2010

One of the oddities of Washington establishment thought is that the Pete Peterson ideology -- the belief that deficits are the most serious problem in America -- is so pervasive that those who share it don't realize it's an ideological belief at all. As a result, efforts to advance the cause of deficit reduction are frequently portrayed not as an ideological decision but as a simple good.

Fiscal Disciple
January 06, 2010

Just before the new year, The Washington Post published the first piece to come out of its partnership with the “new independent digital news publication” The Fiscal Times (TFT). By 7 a.m. that morning, Dean Baker, the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, argued that in publishing the piece The Washington Post had ceased to exist as “a serious newspaper,” and subsequently over a dozen wonks and academics called for the Post to end its partnership with the “propaganda arm for ideologues.”  Why all the hubbub?